Background: s/Aims: Early liver graft regeneration after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is critical for patient outcomes, yet prospective volumetric data from Indian recipients remain limited. This study quantifies early graft regeneration and identifies predictors using computed tomography (CT) volumetry. Methods: In this prospective single-center study, 34 consecutive adult LDLT recipients underwent CT volumetry on postoperative days 7 and 30. Results: Mean baseline graft volume was 607.9 ± 137.9 cm3 , increasing to 957.3 ± 175.7 cm3 at day 7 (+62%, p < 0.001) and 1,293.4 ± 247.0 cm3 at day 30 (+111%, p < 0.001), achieving 93% ± 22.7% of predicted standard liver volume (SLV). Multivariate analysis identified recipient body mass index (BMI) (β = 29.4 cm3 /kg/m2 , 95% CI 14.4–44.4, p < 0.001) and graft-to-recipient-weight ratio (GRWR) (β= 435.9 cm3 per unit, 95% CI 95–777, p = 0.015) as independent predictors of day-30 graft volume (adjusted R2 = 0.349). Left-lobe grafts showed higher proportional growth than right-lobe grafts (174% ± 41% vs. 103% ± 34%, p < 0.001) with comparable absolute volumes (p = 0.56). Younger recipients (19–41 years) demonstrated greater regeneration than older recipients (56–64 years; 160% ± 32% vs. 109% ± 38%, p = 0.01). Mild macrosteatosis (< 30%) did not impair regeneration. Conclusions Liver graft regeneration in this Indian LDLT cohort was rapid, with near-complete SLV restoration by 30 days. BMI and GRWR independently predicted volumetric recovery, supporting personalized graft selection and the expanded use of left-lobe grafts.

Introduction: Treatment of heterotopic ossification (HO) of the elbow is challenging and fraught with complications. Patients who sustain direct trauma to the elbow joint, the central nervous system, and thermal burns are at increased risk for development of HO. There is a paucity of studies and reports on patient’s self-evaluation after the excision of the heterotopic ossification. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study assessed outcomes after excision of heterotopic ossification around the elbow in a cohort of ten patients operated from 2012 to 2015. The outcome assessment was done by the Mayo Elbow Performance index (MEPI) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow score (ASES-E scores). Results: The mean follow-up was 18.11 months after the operation. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was excellent in two elbows, good in six and fair in two. The mean gain in flexion-extension arc after excision of HO was 80 degrees. All of the patients had residual flexion deformity postoperatively. Eight of the nine patients were able to do activities requiring flexion at final follow-up. Conclusion: Excision of HO around the elbow is associated with satisfactory patient-rated outcomes in spite of failure to regain full range of motion.

Pain and pain control are important to the dental profession because the general perception of the public is that dental treatment and pain go hand in hand. Successful dental treatment requires that the source of pain be detected. If the origin of pain is not found, inappropriate dental care and, ultimately, extraction may result. Pain experienced before, during, or after endodontic therapy is a serious concern to both patients and endodontists, and the variability of discomfort presents a challenge in terms of diagnostic methods, endodontic therapy, and endodontic knowledge. This review will help clinicians understand the basic neurophysiology of pulpal pain and other painful conditions of the dental pulp that are not well understood.
Dental Care ; Dental Pulp ; Hand ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Neurophysiology ; Pulpitis