Objective: To characterize perioperative dynamic changes in immune-cell phenotypes and inflammatory cytokines in patients undergoing CPB (cardiopulmonary bypass) cardiac surgery, and to explore their associations with postoperative outcomes. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 120 adult patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery under CPB at West China Hospital from May 2022 to March 2023 were enrolled. Perioperative immune-cell phenotypes and concentrations of 40 inflammation-related cytokines were measured. The primary outcomes were the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at 24 h after surgery and ΔSOFA (the peak SOFA score within 48 h after surgery minus the preoperative SOFA score). Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), acute kidney injury (AKI), respiratory failure, severe liver injury, and infection. Results: The mean age of enrolled patients was 57±10 years. Of these, 52% (62/120) were male and 90% (108/120) underwent valve surgery. During the rewarming to the end of CPB, neutrophil counts rapidly increased (7.39×10 /L vs preoperative 3.07×10 /L, P<0.001), with significant upregulation of CD11b (7.30×10 /L vs preoperative 3.05×10 /L, P<0.001) and CD54 (7.15×10 /L vs preoperative 2.99×10 /L, P<0.001). Lymphocyte counts increased at the end of CPB (1.75×10 /L vs preoperative 1.12×10 /L, P<0.001) but decreased significantly at 24 h after surgery (0.59×10 /L vs preoperative 1.12×10 /L, P<0.001). Plasma analysis showed that multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines increased during CPB and remained elevated up to 24 h after surgery; five chemokines and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 peaked at the end of CPB. The SOFA score increased from 1 (1, 2) preoperatively to 7 (5, 10) at 24 h after surgery, with a ΔSOFA of 6 (4, 8). Within 30 days after surgery, 48 patients (40.0%) developed AKI, 17 (14.2%) developed infection, 4 (3.3%) developed severe liver injury, 3 (2.5%) developed respiratory failure, and 3 (2.5%) experienced MACE. During the 2-year follow-up, 8 patients (6.7%) experienced MACE and 5 (4.2%) died. Conclusion: Multi-organ dysfunction is common after cardiac surgery under CPB (median ΔSOFA, 6), accompanied by perioperative activation of multiple immune-cell subsets and upregulation of pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory, and chemotactic mediators. This study provides data-driven evidence and research clues for further investigation of the associations between CPB-related immune perturbations and postoperative organ dysfunction and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Philippine Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases implemented health protocol guidelines to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. Individuals with comorbidities were advised to take precautionary measures due to their increased vulnerability. This study aimed to assess the relationship between knowledge, acceptance, and adherence to health protocols among fully vaccinated individuals with comorbidities in the National Capital Region, Philippines.

The study employed an explanatory-sequential mixed-method design. The quantitative phase involved an online survey with 384 respondents. The survey included questions on socio-demographic profile, COVID-19 knowledge, acceptability of health protocols, and adherence to preventive practices. Chi-square Test of Independence and Pearson’s Correlation Test were used to analyze the data. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants, providing rich insights into their personal experiences. The interview transcripts were analyzed using Colaizzi’s descriptive method with the aid of qualitative analysis software (MAXQDA), ensuring a rigorous approach to thematic analysis. The integration of the two phases was achieved by connecting quantitative results with qualitative insights, creating a comprehensive understanding of the phenomena under study.

Findings showed that the relationship of sociodemographic characteristics and level of knowledge (Gender pCONCLUSION

The study suggests that multiple factors contribute to non-adherence to health protocols. Recognizing these holes and weaknesses in the COVID-19 pandemic response stresses the need for national leaders to place urgency on properly implementing preventive measures and providing health education to the masses during public health situations. Collaboration from all sectors is crucial in addressing public health crises. This study can be a valuable resource for future researchers, local government units, and policymakers in prioritizing public health care and pandemic preparedness.

INTRODUCTION

Patients with diabetes are at higher risk of developing severe COVID-19 infection with a two-fold increased risk of mortality. This study described the risk factors affecting clinical outcomes of confirmed COVID-19 patients with diabetes mellitus at the University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines.

This retrospective study included 204 patients with COVID-19 (34 with known type 2 diabetes and 2 with new-onset diabetes) from March to October 2020. Clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters were collected and analyzed in subjects with diabetes. A univariate logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the patient’s risk factors associated with mortality or poor prognosis.

Moderate COVID-19 infection occurred in 52.8% of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and critical COVID-19 infection in 27.8%. All patients with critical COVID-19 infection presented with acute respiratory distress syndrome, half had concomitant septic shock and respiratory failure was observed in 27.8%. The average length of hospital stay was approximately 17.5 days. T2DM patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are 5.1 times (95% CI 1.2 to 21.4) more likely to develop severe or critical COVID-19 infection, and more likely to stay in the hospital for more than 14 days. HbA1c >8.5% is a potential risk (OR = 3.7, 0.6 to 21.6) for severe to critical disease. T2DM patients with concomitant coronary artery disease are 7.6 times (95% CI 1.3 to 43.4) more likely to stay longer (more than 14 days) as compared to those without existing coronary artery disease. Prior statin use was a significant risk factor for ICU admission (p-value 0.0341). Other potential risk factors affecting clinical outcomes are obesity (OR 3, 0.4 to 22.7), prior use of thiazolidinedione (OR 7.8, 0.5 to 126.7) or sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (OR 7.5, 0.4 to 145) and prior use of anti-thrombotic (OR 4.6, 0.4 to 56.8). The recovery rate of T2DM patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection was 86.1%.

Patients with T2DM are more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection. The presence of established ASCVD increases the likelihood of severe COVID-19 disease as well as longer length of hospital stay for more than 14 days. Early recognition and prompt treatment led to a favorable recovery rate.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine if selenium supplementation for a period of six months can decrease signs and prevent worsening of mild Graves’ ophthalmopathy among Filipino patients.

We conducted an open-label, assessor-masked, randomized controlled trial involving adult patients diagnosed with mild Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Participants were divided into two groups: one group received standard care (eye drops) alone (control group), while the other group received an additional 200 mcg/day oral selenium supplementation alongside standard care. Inclusion criteria encompassed adult patients with Graves’ hyperthyroidism presenting at least one sign of mild ophthalmopathy and a disease duration of less than 18 months. Statistical analyses were performed using independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s Exact/Chi-square test to compare means, ranks and frequencies between the two intervention groups. Paired sample t-test, Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test were employed to assess changes from baseline to the third and sixth month observations.

A significant difference in clinical activity score (CAS) was observed between the selenium supplementation group and the control group. Initially, 14 eyes (33.33%) in the selenium group exhibited a CAS score of 0, which increased to 27 eyes (64.29%) at the third month of treatment and slightly decreased to 26 eyes (61.9%) at the sixth month. Conversely, the control group had 11 eyes with a CAS score of 0 at baseline, which increased to 16 eyes (38.1%) at three months and decreased to 14 eyes (33.33%) at the sixth month. The improvement in CAS was significantly associated with reductions in caruncle and plica swelling (p = 0.040). Further analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in CAS between the treatment and control groups (p = 0.017) at the sixth month mark.

Selenium supplementation provided significant benefit in reducing the signs and preventing deterioration of mild Graves’ ophthalmopathy, as indicated by improved CAS scores. Future research exploring baseline and end of treatment selenium concentrations in the Philippines is recommended to further substantiate these findings.

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) with concomitant thyroid cancer is rare and is usually caused by a parathyroid adenoma rather than parathyroid carcinoma. Although an association between PHPT and well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma has been reported, it is often considered coincidental. We report a case of a 50-year-old female presenting with tingling, shoulder pain, muscle weakness, and elevated serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels. Neck ultrasonography revealed a hypoechoic nodule in the left inferior region to the thyroid gland and thyroid nodules in both lobes. A Tc99m-MIBI parathyroid scan showed a focal hot nodule, and fine-needle aspiration confirmed papillary thyroid carcinoma, later verified by histopathology. The patient underwent surgery and was diagnosed with PHPT and papillary thyroid carcinoma. This case highlights the importance of evaluation for concomitant thyroid malignancy in PHPT patients with suspicious thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Physician adherence to the recommended management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) at the outpatient setting is crucial to reduce the burden of subsequent rehospitalization, morbidity, and mortality. Recently updated guidelines recommend early and rapid titration to optimal doses of medications in the first 2 to 6 weeks of discharge. In the absence of local data, our study evaluates physician adherence to guideline-recommended treatment in this setting.

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study among post-discharge HFrEF patients at the outpatient department from December 2022 to May 2023 with a follow-up within three months. Clinical profile and treatment were extracted from medical records. Adherence to the 2021 ESC Guidelines Class I recommendations, among eligible patients, is measured as quality indicators. Data are presented using descriptive statistics.

A total of 99 patients were included in the study. Overall, adherence to prescription of beta-blockers (94.8%), ACEI/ARNI/ARBs (88.5%), and diuretics (100%) were high. Prescription of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) were 67% and 57.3%, respectively. Over three months of follow-up, improvement in the quality of care was demonstrated with ACEI/ARNI/ARBs (81.8% to 90.9%), MRA (68.7 to 81.2%), and SGLT2i (58% to 67.7%). Beta-blocker use is consistently high at 97%. In the 3rd month post-discharge, titration to optimal doses was achieved in only 26.4%, 15%, and 6.25% for those on beta-blockers, ACEI/ARNI/ARB, and MRA, respectively. For non-pharmacologic management, referral to HF specialty was made in 30% and cardiac rehabilitation in 22.2%.

Among patients with HFrEF seen at the outpatient, there is good physician adherence to betablockers, ACEI/ARNI/ARBs, and diuretics. MRA and SGLT2i prescription, referral to HF specialty and cardiac rehabilitation, and up-titration to optimal doses of oral medications for HF need improvement. Hospital pathway development and regular performance evaluation will improve initiation, maintenance, and up-titration of appropriate treatment.

BACKGROUND

Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, schools had to switch online. The sudden transition to blended teaching and learning (BTL) poses challenges for students and teachers, especially for health science programs that require hands-on practical experience. The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of these self-report questionnaires (SRQs) should be established to ensure the accuracy of the results as intended by the SRQ.

This study critically appraised, compared, and summarized the psychometric properties of SRQ evaluating BTL among health science university students. This review determined the SRQ’s reliability, internal consistency, various forms of validity (content, criterion, construct), and responsiveness.

Following a 10-step procedure based on COSMIN guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of SRQs used by health science university students to evaluate blended teaching and learning. Studies were eligible if they reported psychometric properties of SRQs related to blended learning among university health science students; exclusions included studies focusing on perceptions, attitudes, self-efficacy, and satisfaction, as well as articles such as biographies, editorials, and conference materials. Searches covered multiple electronic databases until April 26, 2023, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE (OVID), PsycInfo, CINAHL, EBSCOHOST, ERIC, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, JSTOR, Acta Medica Philippina, Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development, and HERDIN, managed through Zotero. Two independent reviewers performed database searches, title and abstract screening, and full-text evaluations, with a third reviewer resolving any disputes. The COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist was employed to evaluate included studies on the development and various measurement properties of SRQs. The reviewers assessed SRQ standards, including validity, reliability, internal consistency, measurement error, responsiveness, interpretability, and feasibility. Data extraction and result tabulation were independently completed, with content comparison by two health education experts. This evaluation categorized the SRQs into three quality and validity levels.

The study examined five articles; four were rated as 'doubtful' and one as 'inadequate' in the overall development of SRQ. All four 'doubtful' studies demonstrated questionable content validity when university students were asked about the questionnaire's relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility. Only half of these studies achieved an 'adequate' rating for content validity based on expert opinions on relevance and comprehensiveness. All but one study scored from 'very good' to 'adequate' in structural validity. Three out of the four studies scored a very good rating for internal consistency, while one was deemed 'inadequate' in internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and reliability. Three out of four studies scored 'very good' on construct validity, but all overlooked criterion validity and responsiveness. Conducted in various locations, including Australia, Romania, Turkey, and Taiwan, these studies highlighted both common characteristics and limitations in questionnaire development according to the COSMIN guidelines. Four studies were deemed reliable and valid for BTL constructs (Category A); Wu et al. requires further validation (Category B). Study limitations included heterogeneity in populations, settings, and questionnaire versions, potential subjective bias in SRQ content comparison, and the evolving nature of SRQs in blended learning contexts.

The systematic review reports the development and evaluation of SRQs for BTL while identifying gaps in their applicability to health science programs. The Blended Learning Scale (BLS) of Lazar et al. and the Blended Learning Questionnaire (BLQ) of Ballouk et al. showed an ‘adequate' rating for content validity. BLS revealed very good structural validity, internal consistency, and adequate content validation. Although the BLQ lacked Confirmatory Factor Analysis, it yielded valuable constructs for evaluating health sciences students' experiences in BTL. Both tools require improvements on recall period, completion time, interpretability, and feasibility. The review underscores the necessity for cont inuous assessment and enhancement of such instruments in BTL, advocating a rigorous scale development process. Furthermore, it encourages the customization of teaching and learning evaluation tools to suit specific institutional contexts while promoting further validation of these questionnaires across different populations in future research.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the real-world data and our clinical experience with metallic stents (MSs) and conventional polymeric stents (PSs) in the management of both malignant and benign chronic ureteric obstruction (CUO), in terms of clinical outcomes and costs. METHODS: Clinical data from our institution, including outcomes for all ureteric stents inserted for long-term management of CUO from all causes from 2014 to 2017, were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the MS and PS episodes. RESULTS: A total of 247 stents were placed in 63 patients with CUO over the 4-year study period. Of these, 45 stents were MSs. There was no significant difference in all baseline characteristics between the MS and PS groups, except for the aetiology of obstructive cause. Mean indwelling stent duration was significantly greater for MS than for PS (228.6 ± 147.0 vs. 146.1 ± 66.0 days, P < 0.001), thereby leading to lower average number of stent changes per year in the MS group compared to the PS group (1.4 vs. 6.3 times, respectively). Despite the higher unit cost of MS compared to PS, there was no significant mean cost difference overall (cost per dwelling day SGD 7.82 ± SGD 10.44 vs. SGD 8.23 ± SGD 20.50, P = 0.888). CONCLUSION Resonance MS is a better option than PS to manage CUO from malignant and benign causes because its significantly longer indwelling time mitigates the higher unit cost of the stent. It potentially reduces the number of procedures and operations in patients. Thus, it should be considered for all patients with CUO requiring long-term ureteric drainage.
Humans ; Ureteral Obstruction/economics* ; Female ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents/economics* ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Chronic Disease ; Ureter/surgery* ; Metals ; Adult ; Aged, 80 and over

INTRODUCTION: A successful vaccination programme forms the cornerstone of controlling coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The unprecedented speed of COVID-19 vaccine development and lack of long-term data have raised fears regarding its safety and efficacy. Vaccine hesitancy can undermine the uptake, and hence success of the vaccination programme. Given the high complication rates of COVID-19 infections in kidney transplant recipients, it is particularly important to identify and address vaccine hesitancy in this population. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among kidney transplant recipients attending transplant clinic between 5 April and 5 May 2021. The survey assessed attitudes towards COVID-19, willingness/hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccination, vaccination concerns and prompts to vaccination. This was scored on a Likert scale with scores ranging from 'strongly disagree' - 1 point to 'strongly agree' - 5 points. RESULTS: One hundred and one completed responses were captured. Of these, 86% respondents reported to agree or strongly agree to vaccination. This was despite significant concerns of allograft rejection (mean score 4.12, standard deviation [SD] 0.97) and decreased immunosuppressant efficacy (mean score 4.14, SD 0.96) with vaccination. Multivariable model showed a positive association with transplant vintage of ≥ 5 years (median 2.41), lower educational levels of secondary school or less (median 5.82) and healthcare provider advocacy (median 1.88) in predicting vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSIONS Vaccine acceptance rate was high among kidney transplant recipients. Vaccine hesitancy remains a concern in those with a transplant vintage of less than 5 years and those with tertiary educational level. Healthcare provider advocacy is important in improving vaccine acceptance rates.
Humans ; Kidney Transplantation ; Singapore/epidemiology* ; Male ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Transplant Recipients/psychology* ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data* ; Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology* ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vaccination/psychology* ; Aged ; SARS-CoV-2

BACKGROUND: Effective interventions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic require an understanding of patients' knowledge and perceptions that influence their behaviour. Our study assessed knowledge of COVID-19 among kidney transplant recipients and donors, hitherto unevaluated. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 325 kidney transplant recipients and 172 donors between 1 May 2020 and 30 June 2020. The survey questionnaire assessed knowledge levels of COVID-19, sociodemographic data, health status, psychosocial impact of COVID-19 and precautionary behaviours during the pandemic. RESULTS: The mean COVID-19 knowledge score of the study population was 7.5 (standard deviation: 2.2) out of 10. The mean score was significantly higher among kidney recipients compared to kidney donors (7.9 [1.9] vs. 6.7 [2.6]; P <0.001). Younger age (21-49 vs. ≥50 years) and higher education (diploma and higher vs. secondary and lower) were associated with significantly higher knowledge scores in donors, but not among recipients ( P -interactions ≤0.01). In both kidney recipients and donors, financial concerns and/or social isolation were associated with lower knowledge levels. CONCLUSIONS Concerted efforts are needed to improve COVID-19 knowledge in kidney transplant recipients and donors, particularly older donors, donors with lower education and patients with financial concerns or feelings of social isolation. Intensive patient education may mitigate the impact of education levels on COVID-19 knowledge levels.
Humans ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Kidney Transplantation ; Middle Aged ; Singapore/epidemiology* ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Transplant Recipients/psychology* ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tissue Donors/psychology* ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Young Adult ; Aged ; Pandemics