INTRODUCTION

Administration of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation is recommended to pregnant women at risk of preterm delivery to decrease the risk of respiratory distress syndrome, intra-ventricular hemorrhage and neonatal death. However, it may worsen glycemic profile primarily in those with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

To determine the effects of ACS on maternal glycemia in Filipino women with GDM and to analyze the factors associated with insulin use or increased insulin requirement.

A retrospective study of the medical records of Filipino women with GDM who were admitted and received ACS treatment (betamethasone) between 24- and 36-weeks age of gestation (AOG) for fetal lung maturity from 2017-2019. Clinical characteristics (age, parity, completed ACS dose, AOG at ACS administration and mode of delivery) and glycemic control were retrieved and compared before and after ACS treatment. Data collection began the day or on the day before steroids were given and continued until discharge or delivery.

Included were 42 pregnant women with GDM. Of these, 28 women with GDM were treated by diet alone (Group A) while 14 women with GDM were started on insulin in addition to diet (Group B). After betamethasone therapy was initiated, only three (Group A1; n=3/28) patients had good glycemic control with diet alone and the rest were given insulin treatment (Group A2; n=25/28). In this subpopulation of Group A2, insulin requirement within 24 hours after ACS was at 0.3 units per kg of body weight. There was a steady increase with maximum requirement observed on day 4 and decreased thereafter to 0.33 units per kg of body weight on day 5. For GDM women in Group B, only three maintained their insulin dose (Group B1; n=3/14) while 11 (Group B2; n=11/14) women with GDM previously on insulin, required further increase in insulin from day 1-2 reaching 140% increase in insulin dose on day 2. Thereafter, there was a gradual decrease of insulin dose almost returning to initial dose on day 5.

Insulin initiation was observed among GDM diet-controlled mothers (Group A) who were given ACS therapy at ≥31 weeks age of gestation. Age, parity, family history of diabetes and mode of delivery did not have significant effects on insulin use nor increased insulin requirement. Fasting capillary glucose (FCG) and one-hour post-prandial capillary glucose (PPCG) were elevated within 24 hours after administration of corticosteroid (betamethasone) in 60%-70% of our population. The FCG values remained elevated on day 2-3 in about 70% of patients. While the first hour PPCG was elevated in 85% of patients on day 2 and remained elevated in 70% of women on day 3-4, it reached 53% on day 5. Insulin requirement among Group B2 reached to 140% increase in insulin dose on day 2 followed by a gradual decrease of insulin dose almost returning to initial dose on day 5.

ACS administration caused maternal hyperglycemia in Filipino women with GDM during the first 24 hours and lasting up to five days. Both fasting glucose and post-prandial glucose were elevated, hence intensified monitoring of maternal glucose levels and temporary addition or increase of insulin doses may be necessary. The timing (≥31 weeks AOG) of administration of ACS on GDM women was associated with subsequent insulin initiation but only on patients initially controlled on diet alone.

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may increase fetal abdominal fat mass, but its correlation with fetal abdominal circumference (AC) is inconsistent. This study compares third trimester fetal AC between adult pregnant patients with and without GDM, and between those managed with diet modification alone versus insulin therapy.

This retrospective cohort study involved 354 Filipino adult pregnant patients at The Medical City admitted for delivery from January 2016 to May 2022. This included 180 patients with GDM, and 174 patients without GDM. One hundred sixteen (116) of the GDM patients were diet-managed, and 64 were insulin-requiring. Participants underwent third trimester fetal AC ultrasound and 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24 to 28 weeks of gestation. The third trimester fetal AC, fetal outcomes and maternal outcomes between patient groups were analyzed using Stata 15.0.

The GDM group had higher rates of cesarean section delivery (70% vs 46.55%, pCONCLUSION

Third trimester fetal AC is significantly larger in women with GDM compared to non-GDM women, regardless of management method. Monitoring fetal AC during the third trimester is important for prenatal care in GDM pregnancies.

Introduction: Patient education is integral in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a common pregnancy complication that may cause adverse perinatal outcomes. This study evaluated the effect of diabetes education on the knowledge and attitude among patients with GDM, comparing pre- vs post-diabetes session scores and determining pregnancy outcomes. Methodology: A one-group pre-test and post-test experimental design study was conducted on 75 patients after one- session diabetes counseling using the Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Questionnaire (GDMKQ) and the third version of the Diabetes Attitude Scale (DAS-3). Results: Of the 75 subjects, 84% exhibited adequate knowledge of diabetes. Post-education, a significant increase in the total scores was seen among those less than 35 years of age (p-value: 0.003), both employed and unemployed (p-value: 0.0.026, 0.047, respectively), with a secondary level of education (p-value: 0.014) and multigravid (p-value: 0.015). An overall median positive attitude score of 3.6 was documented. For neonatal outcomes, no adverse events existed. For maternal outcomes, 17.9% had elevated fasting blood glucose while 7.1% had elevated 2-hour post-glucose tolerance test. Conclusion Diabetes education improves patient’s knowledge but not their attitude. Hence, improvement in attitude interventions should be incorporated into the current diabetes education program.
Diabetes, Gestational ; Knowledge ; Attitude

Objective: To determine the efficacy of metformin and insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methodology: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were retrieved from the databases. All references cited in the articles were also searched by hand to identify additional publications. Studies included were limited to trials on metformin and insulin in the management of GDM in singleton pregnancies. Four RCTs were analyzed in the study. The risk of bias was assessed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Cochrane Collaboration’s tool (Rob 2). Random effects meta-analysis was carried out to pool the data. All analyses were conducted in Review Manager 5.3.5 (2014). Results: Meta-analysis of four RCT involving 807 participants (405 were treated with metformin and 402 were treated with insulin) shows that there was no significant difference between metformin and insulin in achieving glycemic control as to fasting blood sugar (FBS), postprandial blood glucose (PPBG), and glycosylated hemoglobin, mean difference (MD) −0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] −2.77–1.91; P = 0.72), MD −2.13 (95% CI −5.16–0.90, P = 0.17), MD −0.09 (95% CI −0.20–0.02, P = 0.10), respectively. For maternal outcomes, there was a statistically significant 69% decreased risk of hypoglycemia in the metformin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.31, 95% CI 0.20–0.49; P < 0.001). There was no difference in terms of risk of preterm birth (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.75–1.64, P = 0.60); hypertensive disorders (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.71–1.60, P = 0.77); polyhydramnios (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.51–2.14, P = 0.91); and risk of cesarean delivery (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.75–1.08, P = 0.27). For neonatal outcomes, there was statistically significant 34% reduction on the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46–0.94; P = 0.02) in the metformin group. There was no statistical difference in terms of mean birthweight (MD − 81.34, 95% CI −181.69–19.02, P = 0.11). Metformin has decreased the risk of newborns weighing more than 4000 g, babies with birthweight >90th percentile by 27% (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.28–1.90, P = 0.52), and 20% (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54–1.18,P = 0.26), respectively, but these were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in terms of risk of birthweight <10th percentile (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.60–2.31, P = 0.65); APGAR <7 (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65–2.08, P = 0.60), birth trauma (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.23–2.58, P = 0.67), and jaundice requiring phototherapy RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.66–1.65, P = 0.85). Neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.64–1.23, P = 0.48), respiratory distress syndrome (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.36–1.50, P = 0.39), transient tachypnea (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.27–2.19, P = 0.63), and any congenital anomaly (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.20–1.67, P = 0.31) were decreased in the metformin group but was not statistically significant. Conclusion There was no significant difference between metformin and insulin in achieving glycemic control as to FBS and PPBG among patients with GDM. There was a statistically significant reduction in the risk of maternal and neonatal hypoglycemia in the use of metformin.
Diabetes, Gestational ; Glycemic Control ; Insulin ; Metformin

Pregnancy ; Female ; Humans ; Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis* ; Retrospective Studies ; Prognosis ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Maternal Age

Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication with adverse fetal and maternal outcomes. Currently, there are only a few validated tools available that address knowledge in GDM. Recognition of the inconsistencies will provide for an effective learning program to achieve optimal results. This study aimed at validating the “Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Questionnaire” (GDMKQ). Methodology: A cross-sectional validation study on GDMKQ among 51 GDM patients aged at least 18 years was conducted in the outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital. Excluded were those with pre-existing diabetes. The questionnaire was submitted for peer review for translation to Filipino and back-translation. Concurrent validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire were undertaken as part of the validation process. Descriptive analysis was used for data elaboration by using SPSS v23. Results: The Filipino version of GDMKQ demonstrated sensible content and face validity. As measured, respondents obtained higher total and domain scores with better knowledge levels of GDM compared to its English version. An overall adequate knowledge was observed among those married and college subgroup as compared to single women and those with secondary level of education. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated at 0.632 using the Kuder-Richardson 20. The test-retest scores using the Filipino-translated questionnaire has a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.853 with moderate to good level of agreement with each other, and Cohen’s kappa of 0.564 with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.828. Conclusion The Filipino-translated version of GDMKQ is a valid screening tool that assesses a patient’s knowledge of gestational diabetes. Identifying the level of their understanding will enable clinicians to develop an individualized, effective learning program to improve pregnancy outcomes.
Diabetes, Gestational ; Knowledge ; Surveys and Questionnaires

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the maternal and fetal effects of hyperglycemia, and to compare the clinical outcomes between pregnant teenagers and adult women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

This was a retrospective cohort study among pregnant women who tested positive for GDM by 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Data was collected from the 1st of January 2015 to the 31st of December 2019. Maternal and fetal outcomes and the factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes among teenage women and adult women with GDM were studied.

A total of 254 charts of women with GDM were reviewed. Overall, adverse maternal outcomes were found in 94.12% and 90% of teenage and adults, respectively; and were almost more likely among primigravida (OR=3.984, CI=1.32-12, p=0.014). The study also showed less probability of having adverse maternal outcomes among multipara and grand multipara women (OR=0.2545, CI=0.08-0.79, P=0.018 and OR=0.1091, CI=0.03-0.45, p=0.002) respectively. Adverse neonatal outcomes were more likely among women who had prior delivery of macrosomic baby (OR=21.9091, CI=1.28-3.73, P=0.033). No adverse fetal outcome records were seen among teenage mothers, while adult women had 5.45% incidence.

Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly higher in the teenage GDM population compared to adult GDM. However, diagnosing and managing GDM among these groups would be beneficial considering their life expectancy and the need for a lifelong preventive program to avoid future development of Type 2 DM (T2DM) and its complications.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common pregnancy complications and has serious implications for the health of mothers and their offspring. In recent years, studies have confirmed that air pollution is one of the main risk factors for diabetes, and there is increasing evidence that air pollution exposure is closely related to the occurrence of gestational diabetes. However, current studies on the association between air pollutant exposure and the incidence of gestational diabetes are inconsistent, and the window period of pollutant exposure is still unclear. Limited mechanistic studies suggest that airborne particulate matter and gaseous pollutants may affect GDM through multiple mechanisms, including inflammation, oxidative stress, disruption of adipokine secretion, and imbalance of intestinal flora. This review summarizes the relationship between air pollutant exposure and the incidence of GDM in recent years, as well as the possible molecular mechanism of the occurrence and development of GDM caused by air pollutants, in order to provide scientific basis for preventing pollutant exposure, reducing the risk of GDM, improving maternal and fetal outcomes and improving the quality of the birth population.
Pregnancy ; Female ; Humans ; Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology* ; Air Pollution/analysis* ; Air Pollutants/analysis* ; Particulate Matter/analysis* ; Risk Factors ; Maternal Exposure/adverse effects*

Gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM)is one of the common complications during pregnancy. It is associated with many adverse pregnancy outcomes, threatening maternal and child health seriously. The exact pathogenesis of GDM remains unclear. Long term exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) is considered to be one of the risk factors for GDM. More and more studies are concerned about the relationship between them. Based on the literature published at home and abroad, this article summarizes the correlation and possibly related mechanism of POPs and GDM, and explores the correlation between pops and GDM, so as to provide a new idea for the prevention of gestational diabetes.
Pregnancy ; Female ; Child ; Humans ; Diabetes, Gestational ; Persistent Organic Pollutants ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Environmental Pollutants ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVES: The number of gestational women has been increased in recent years, resulting in more adverse pregnancy outcomes. It is crucial to assess the coagulation function of pregnant women and to intervene in a timely manner. This study aims to analyze the influencing factors on thrombelastography (TEG) and explore the evaluation of TEG for gestational women. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 449 pregnant women who were hospitalized in the obstetrics department in Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from 2018 to 2020. We compared the changes on the TEG parameters among normal pregnant women between different age groups, different ingravidation groups, and different stages of pregnancy groups. The influence on TEG of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) as well as two diseases synchronization was explored. RESULTS: Compared with the normal second trimester women, the R values and K values of TEG were increased, and α angle, CI values and LY30 values were decreased in third trimester women (all P<0.05). Compared with normal group, the R values and CI values of TEG of the HDP group have significant difference (both P<0.05). There were no significant difference of TEG between the GDM group, the HDP combined with GDM group and the normal group (all P>0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the influencing factors for R value in TEG were weeks of gestation (P<0.001) and mode of conception (P<0.05), for α angle was weeks of gestation (P<0.05), for MA value was mode of conception (P<0.05), and for CI value was weeks of gestation (P<0.05). The analysis of correlation between TEG with platelet (PLT) and coagulation routines represented that there was a correlation between TEG R values and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (P<0.01), and negative correlation between TEG CI values and APTT (P<0.05). There was a negative correlation between TEG K values and FIB (P<0.05). The correlation of α angle (P<0.05), MA values (P<0.01) and CI values (P<0.05) with FIB were positive respectively. CONCLUSIONS The TEG parameters of 3 stages of pregnancy were different. The different ingravidation approach has effect on TEG. The TEG parameters were consistent with conventional coagulation indicators. The TEG can be used to screen the coagulation status of gestational women, recognize the abnormalities of coagulation and prevent the severe complication timely.
Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Thrombelastography/methods* ; Blood Coagulation Tests/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Blood Coagulation ; Blood Platelets ; Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis*