Cutaneous sporotrichosis is a fungal infection caused by traumatic inoculation of Sporothrix. We aimed to study the clinical characteristics of human sporotrichosis, risk factors for infection, the yield of diagnostic methods and therapeutic response to standard clinical therapy. A cohort study of was performed. A total of 29 patients with clinical features suggestive of sporotrichosis were recruited within a one-year period from all public hospitals in Kedah, Malaysia. Majority were females (86%) who were housewives (69%). The most common comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (38%), hypertension (31%) and dyslipidaemia (21%), none was a significant risk factor for severity of infection. Mean duration of disease was 2±2 months. More than 2/3 of the patients (79%) had pet cats, 14(48%) recalled minor cat-inflicted trauma. Lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis (62%) was more common than fixed cutaneous type, affecting the upper limbs in 94%. Ulcerations and nodules were the main lesion morphology. Histopathology showed granulomatous inflammation in 72%, culture grew Sprorothrix in 55% and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detected Sporothrix schenkii sensu stricto in 65%. Itraconazole was effective with 93% of patients achieving complete resolution with 4 months of therapy. Sporotrichosis in Malaysia remains endemic. Feline contact is the most important risk factor for infection. Diagnosis is best confirmed with tissue PCR while culture and histopathology are also useful. Sporothrix schenkii sensu stricto was the only species identified and itraconazole is an effective first line therapeutic agent.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management demands innovative strategies that address its complex nature. Telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation, which utilize wearable devices, represent promising avenues in this regard. This narrative review synthesizes the current literature to comprehensively compare these modalities in terms of accessibility, monitoring mechanisms, patient adherence, cost-effectiveness, and social support. Telerehabilitation offers unparalleled convenience, real-time monitoring, and personalized feedback through wearables, thereby fostering greater patient engagement and adherence compared to conventional rehabilitation. However, conventional rehabilitation provides face-to-face interactions, immediate feedback, and a more personalized touch, albeit with logistical challenges and higher costs. This review emphasizes the significance of patient preferences, technological access, and healthcare infrastructure in selecting the appropriate approach. It also calls for further research into long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and the optimal integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs. Ultimately, both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation demonstrate considerable potential in empowering individuals with T2DM, underlining the imperative for tailored and patient-centric interventions in diabetes care. The review also stresses the significance of integrating patient preferences and their level of comfort with technology when deciding on treatment approaches. It also takes into account the diverse socioeconomic contexts and healthcare infrastructures globally, which can affect the viability and efficacy of both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation. Moreover, the integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs holds promise for enhancing self-management capabilities and promoting healthier lifestyles. However, it is essential to tackle prospective discrepancies in access to these technologies and ensure fair distribution. Looking forward, ongoing research efforts should focus on justifying long-term outcomes, optimizing cost-effectiveness, and refining implementation strategies to maximize the benefits of both modalities.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management demands innovative strategies that address its complex nature. Telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation, which utilize wearable devices, represent promising avenues in this regard. This narrative review synthesizes the current literature to comprehensively compare these modalities in terms of accessibility, monitoring mechanisms, patient adherence, cost-effectiveness, and social support. Telerehabilitation offers unparalleled convenience, real-time monitoring, and personalized feedback through wearables, thereby fostering greater patient engagement and adherence compared to conventional rehabilitation. However, conventional rehabilitation provides face-to-face interactions, immediate feedback, and a more personalized touch, albeit with logistical challenges and higher costs. This review emphasizes the significance of patient preferences, technological access, and healthcare infrastructure in selecting the appropriate approach. It also calls for further research into long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and the optimal integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs. Ultimately, both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation demonstrate considerable potential in empowering individuals with T2DM, underlining the imperative for tailored and patient-centric interventions in diabetes care. The review also stresses the significance of integrating patient preferences and their level of comfort with technology when deciding on treatment approaches. It also takes into account the diverse socioeconomic contexts and healthcare infrastructures globally, which can affect the viability and efficacy of both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation. Moreover, the integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs holds promise for enhancing self-management capabilities and promoting healthier lifestyles. However, it is essential to tackle prospective discrepancies in access to these technologies and ensure fair distribution. Looking forward, ongoing research efforts should focus on justifying long-term outcomes, optimizing cost-effectiveness, and refining implementation strategies to maximize the benefits of both modalities.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management demands innovative strategies that address its complex nature. Telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation, which utilize wearable devices, represent promising avenues in this regard. This narrative review synthesizes the current literature to comprehensively compare these modalities in terms of accessibility, monitoring mechanisms, patient adherence, cost-effectiveness, and social support. Telerehabilitation offers unparalleled convenience, real-time monitoring, and personalized feedback through wearables, thereby fostering greater patient engagement and adherence compared to conventional rehabilitation. However, conventional rehabilitation provides face-to-face interactions, immediate feedback, and a more personalized touch, albeit with logistical challenges and higher costs. This review emphasizes the significance of patient preferences, technological access, and healthcare infrastructure in selecting the appropriate approach. It also calls for further research into long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and the optimal integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs. Ultimately, both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation demonstrate considerable potential in empowering individuals with T2DM, underlining the imperative for tailored and patient-centric interventions in diabetes care. The review also stresses the significance of integrating patient preferences and their level of comfort with technology when deciding on treatment approaches. It also takes into account the diverse socioeconomic contexts and healthcare infrastructures globally, which can affect the viability and efficacy of both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation. Moreover, the integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs holds promise for enhancing self-management capabilities and promoting healthier lifestyles. However, it is essential to tackle prospective discrepancies in access to these technologies and ensure fair distribution. Looking forward, ongoing research efforts should focus on justifying long-term outcomes, optimizing cost-effectiveness, and refining implementation strategies to maximize the benefits of both modalities.

Objective:To develop postoperative care plans based on intervention diagram for young and middle-aged postoperative glioma patients, and validate their effectiveness.Methods:A convenience sample of 68 young and middle-aged glioma patients who underwent surgery at Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, between September 2023 and April 2024 was recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group (34 cases each) using a random number table. The control group received routine nursing care, while the intervention group received additional care based on the intervention diagram program. Self-perceived burden scores, psychological distress scores, and quality of life scores were compared between the two groups before the intervention and after one month.Results:Prior to the intervention, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of total or dimensional scores of self-perceived burden ( P>0.05). After the intervention, the intervention group showed lower scores in all dimensions and total scores of self-perceived burden compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were found between the two groups in psychological distress and quality of life scores before the intervention ( P>0.05) ; however, after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated lower psychological distress and higher quality of life scores than the control group, with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05) . Conclusions:The intervention diagram-based program effectively reduces self-perceived burden and psychological distress, and enhances quality of life in young and middle-aged postoperative glioma patients.

Objective:To develop postoperative care plans based on intervention diagram for young and middle-aged postoperative glioma patients, and validate their effectiveness.Methods:A convenience sample of 68 young and middle-aged glioma patients who underwent surgery at Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, between September 2023 and April 2024 was recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group (34 cases each) using a random number table. The control group received routine nursing care, while the intervention group received additional care based on the intervention diagram program. Self-perceived burden scores, psychological distress scores, and quality of life scores were compared between the two groups before the intervention and after one month.Results:Prior to the intervention, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of total or dimensional scores of self-perceived burden ( P>0.05). After the intervention, the intervention group showed lower scores in all dimensions and total scores of self-perceived burden compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were found between the two groups in psychological distress and quality of life scores before the intervention ( P>0.05) ; however, after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated lower psychological distress and higher quality of life scores than the control group, with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05) . Conclusions:The intervention diagram-based program effectively reduces self-perceived burden and psychological distress, and enhances quality of life in young and middle-aged postoperative glioma patients.

Objective:To explore the current status of presenteeism among ICU nurses and its correlation with resilience-related practice environment.Methods:Convenience sampling was adopted to select 434 ICU nurses from Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University in October 2022 as study subjects. An online questionnaire was conducted using the General Information Questionnaire, Chinese version of the Standford Presenteeism Scale-6 (SPS-6), and Nurse Resilience-related Practice Environment Factor Assessment Scale. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analysis were used to explore the relationship between ICU nurses' resilience-related practice environment and presenteeism.Results:Among ICU nurses, the total score on the Nurse Resilience-related Practice Environment Factor Assessment Scale was (122.71±26.14) and the SPS-6 score was (16.11±4.66). Presenteeism was negatively correlated with total scores on the Nurse Resilience-related Practice Environment Factor Assessment Scale and scores on career support and development, practice support and development, and personal support and development ( r=-0.494, -0.471, -0.444, and -0.476; P<0.001). Regression analysis showed that resilience-related practice environment negatively predicted presenteeism in nurses ( P<0.001) . Conclusions:ICU nurses are at a high level of presenteeism, and total scores on the Nurse Resilience-related Practice Environment Factor Assessment Scale are negatively correlated with presenteeism. Nursing administrators should emphasize the psychological state of ICU nurses and improve the resilience-related practice environment in ICUs, thereby reducing the incidence of presenteeism among ICU nurses.

Objective:To explore the current status of presenteeism among ICU nurses and its correlation with resilience-related practice environment.Methods:Convenience sampling was adopted to select 434 ICU nurses from Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University in October 2022 as study subjects. An online questionnaire was conducted using the General Information Questionnaire, Chinese version of the Standford Presenteeism Scale-6 (SPS-6), and Nurse Resilience-related Practice Environment Factor Assessment Scale. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analysis were used to explore the relationship between ICU nurses' resilience-related practice environment and presenteeism.Results:Among ICU nurses, the total score on the Nurse Resilience-related Practice Environment Factor Assessment Scale was (122.71±26.14) and the SPS-6 score was (16.11±4.66). Presenteeism was negatively correlated with total scores on the Nurse Resilience-related Practice Environment Factor Assessment Scale and scores on career support and development, practice support and development, and personal support and development ( r=-0.494, -0.471, -0.444, and -0.476; P<0.001). Regression analysis showed that resilience-related practice environment negatively predicted presenteeism in nurses ( P<0.001) . Conclusions:ICU nurses are at a high level of presenteeism, and total scores on the Nurse Resilience-related Practice Environment Factor Assessment Scale are negatively correlated with presenteeism. Nursing administrators should emphasize the psychological state of ICU nurses and improve the resilience-related practice environment in ICUs, thereby reducing the incidence of presenteeism among ICU nurses.

We report the case of a 43-year-old woman with a giant retrosternal multinodular goiter causing progressive dyspnea and severe tracheal compression. Imaging revealed a mass extending from C5 to T9 vertebral levels. Given its extensive intrathoracic extension, a combined cervical incision and median sternotomy was performed. The mass was excised completely with preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves and parathyroid glands. The patient recovered uneventfully without complications. This case emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary planning and highlights surgical decision-making in retrosternal goiters with mediastinal extension.