Cutaneous sporotrichosis is a fungal infection caused by traumatic inoculation of Sporothrix. We aimed to study the clinical characteristics of human sporotrichosis, risk factors for infection, the yield of diagnostic methods and therapeutic response to standard clinical therapy. A cohort study of was performed. A total of 29 patients with clinical features suggestive of sporotrichosis were recruited within a one-year period from all public hospitals in Kedah, Malaysia. Majority were females (86%) who were housewives (69%). The most common comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (38%), hypertension (31%) and dyslipidaemia (21%), none was a significant risk factor for severity of infection. Mean duration of disease was 2±2 months. More than 2/3 of the patients (79%) had pet cats, 14(48%) recalled minor cat-inflicted trauma. Lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis (62%) was more common than fixed cutaneous type, affecting the upper limbs in 94%. Ulcerations and nodules were the main lesion morphology. Histopathology showed granulomatous inflammation in 72%, culture grew Sprorothrix in 55% and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detected Sporothrix schenkii sensu stricto in 65%. Itraconazole was effective with 93% of patients achieving complete resolution with 4 months of therapy. Sporotrichosis in Malaysia remains endemic. Feline contact is the most important risk factor for infection. Diagnosis is best confirmed with tissue PCR while culture and histopathology are also useful. Sporothrix schenkii sensu stricto was the only species identified and itraconazole is an effective first line therapeutic agent.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management demands innovative strategies that address its complex nature. Telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation, which utilize wearable devices, represent promising avenues in this regard. This narrative review synthesizes the current literature to comprehensively compare these modalities in terms of accessibility, monitoring mechanisms, patient adherence, cost-effectiveness, and social support. Telerehabilitation offers unparalleled convenience, real-time monitoring, and personalized feedback through wearables, thereby fostering greater patient engagement and adherence compared to conventional rehabilitation. However, conventional rehabilitation provides face-to-face interactions, immediate feedback, and a more personalized touch, albeit with logistical challenges and higher costs. This review emphasizes the significance of patient preferences, technological access, and healthcare infrastructure in selecting the appropriate approach. It also calls for further research into long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and the optimal integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs. Ultimately, both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation demonstrate considerable potential in empowering individuals with T2DM, underlining the imperative for tailored and patient-centric interventions in diabetes care. The review also stresses the significance of integrating patient preferences and their level of comfort with technology when deciding on treatment approaches. It also takes into account the diverse socioeconomic contexts and healthcare infrastructures globally, which can affect the viability and efficacy of both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation. Moreover, the integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs holds promise for enhancing self-management capabilities and promoting healthier lifestyles. However, it is essential to tackle prospective discrepancies in access to these technologies and ensure fair distribution. Looking forward, ongoing research efforts should focus on justifying long-term outcomes, optimizing cost-effectiveness, and refining implementation strategies to maximize the benefits of both modalities.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management demands innovative strategies that address its complex nature. Telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation, which utilize wearable devices, represent promising avenues in this regard. This narrative review synthesizes the current literature to comprehensively compare these modalities in terms of accessibility, monitoring mechanisms, patient adherence, cost-effectiveness, and social support. Telerehabilitation offers unparalleled convenience, real-time monitoring, and personalized feedback through wearables, thereby fostering greater patient engagement and adherence compared to conventional rehabilitation. However, conventional rehabilitation provides face-to-face interactions, immediate feedback, and a more personalized touch, albeit with logistical challenges and higher costs. This review emphasizes the significance of patient preferences, technological access, and healthcare infrastructure in selecting the appropriate approach. It also calls for further research into long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and the optimal integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs. Ultimately, both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation demonstrate considerable potential in empowering individuals with T2DM, underlining the imperative for tailored and patient-centric interventions in diabetes care. The review also stresses the significance of integrating patient preferences and their level of comfort with technology when deciding on treatment approaches. It also takes into account the diverse socioeconomic contexts and healthcare infrastructures globally, which can affect the viability and efficacy of both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation. Moreover, the integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs holds promise for enhancing self-management capabilities and promoting healthier lifestyles. However, it is essential to tackle prospective discrepancies in access to these technologies and ensure fair distribution. Looking forward, ongoing research efforts should focus on justifying long-term outcomes, optimizing cost-effectiveness, and refining implementation strategies to maximize the benefits of both modalities.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management demands innovative strategies that address its complex nature. Telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation, which utilize wearable devices, represent promising avenues in this regard. This narrative review synthesizes the current literature to comprehensively compare these modalities in terms of accessibility, monitoring mechanisms, patient adherence, cost-effectiveness, and social support. Telerehabilitation offers unparalleled convenience, real-time monitoring, and personalized feedback through wearables, thereby fostering greater patient engagement and adherence compared to conventional rehabilitation. However, conventional rehabilitation provides face-to-face interactions, immediate feedback, and a more personalized touch, albeit with logistical challenges and higher costs. This review emphasizes the significance of patient preferences, technological access, and healthcare infrastructure in selecting the appropriate approach. It also calls for further research into long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and the optimal integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs. Ultimately, both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation demonstrate considerable potential in empowering individuals with T2DM, underlining the imperative for tailored and patient-centric interventions in diabetes care. The review also stresses the significance of integrating patient preferences and their level of comfort with technology when deciding on treatment approaches. It also takes into account the diverse socioeconomic contexts and healthcare infrastructures globally, which can affect the viability and efficacy of both telerehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation. Moreover, the integration of wearable technology in diabetes management programs holds promise for enhancing self-management capabilities and promoting healthier lifestyles. However, it is essential to tackle prospective discrepancies in access to these technologies and ensure fair distribution. Looking forward, ongoing research efforts should focus on justifying long-term outcomes, optimizing cost-effectiveness, and refining implementation strategies to maximize the benefits of both modalities.

We report a rare case of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) following treatment for May–Thurner syndrome complicated by deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which resulted in venous stent thrombosis. A 27-year-old male with acute left lower-limb DVT successfully underwent thrombolysis and stenting for May–Thurner syndrome. However, the patient developed recurrent thrombosis and thrombocytopenia 3 days post-procedure. HITT was confirmed by a positive antiplatelet factor 4-heparin antibody test. After discontinuing heparin, the patient was successfully treated with fondaparinux, followed by repeat thrombectomy and thrombolysis, and then transitioned to warfarin. This is the second reported case of venous stent thrombosis due to HITT in May–Thurner syndrome. This case underscores the importance of early recognition and prompt management of HITT using alternative anticoagulants like fondaparinux to prevent complications such as venous limb gangrene. Further randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fondaparinux in HITT.

Objective: Stroke is the second-leading cause of death globally. Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) represents 10-15% of ischemic strokes in Western countries and up to 47% in Asian countries. Patients with ICAS have an especially high risk of stroke recurrence. The aim of this meta-analysis is to reassess recurrent stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and other outcomes with stenting versus best medical management for symptomatic ICAS. Methods: The search protocol was developed a priori according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The OVID Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to August 14th, 2022. Results: This Meta-analysis Included Four Randomized Controlled Trials (Rcts), With A Total Number Of 991 Patients. The Mean Age Of Participants Was 57 Years. The Total Number Of Intracranial Stenting Patients Was 495, And The Number Of Medical Treatment Patients Was 496. The Included Studies Were Published Between 2011 And 2022. Two Studies Were Conducted In The Usa, And The Other Two In China. All Included Studies Compared Intracranial Stenting To Medical Treatment For Icas. Conclusions In patients with ischemic stroke due to symptomatic severe intracranial atherosclerosis, the rate of 30-day ischemic stroke, 30-day intracerebral hemorrhage, one-year stroke in territory or mortality favored the medical treatment alone without intracranial stenting. The risk of same-territory stroke at last follow-up, disabling stroke at last follow-up, and mortality did not significantly favor either group. Intracranial stenting for atherosclerosis did not result in significant benefit over medical treatment.

We present a case of intracranial aneurysm located in the P1 segment of left posterior cerebral artery in the context of tetralogy of Fallot. Complex variations included right aortic arch with abnormal branching. Also, the bilateral vertebral arteries were absent, with a type I persistent proatlantal intersegmental artery of the left side. The aneurysm was treated with endovascular intervention with a Tubridge flow diverter and was noted to be completely cured on 6-month follow-up. We discuss the many considerations in this patient including developmental and modern-era treatment.

This is a unique case of metastatic pheochromocytoma of the cervical spine treated with preoperative embolization and subsequent en bloc resection. A 65-year-old man with metastatic pheochromocytoma presented with two weeks of worsening neck pain, left arm and leg weakness and paresthesia, and urinary incontinence. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a metastatic osseous lesion at C6 with severe stenosis and spinal cord compression. The patient underwent successful preoperative angiographic embolization with a liquid embolic agent followed by C5-C7 laminectomy, en bloc tumor resection, and C3-T2 posterior spinal fusion. Six weeks postoperatively, the patient reported improving strength and resolving neck pain and paresthesias. While there is no standard paradigm for the treatment of metastatic pheochromocytomas of the cervical spine, preoperative embolization may minimize intraoperative blood loss and hemodynamic instability during subsequent surgical resection.

We report a rare case of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) following treatment for May–Thurner syndrome complicated by deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which resulted in venous stent thrombosis. A 27-year-old male with acute left lower-limb DVT successfully underwent thrombolysis and stenting for May–Thurner syndrome. However, the patient developed recurrent thrombosis and thrombocytopenia 3 days post-procedure. HITT was confirmed by a positive antiplatelet factor 4-heparin antibody test. After discontinuing heparin, the patient was successfully treated with fondaparinux, followed by repeat thrombectomy and thrombolysis, and then transitioned to warfarin. This is the second reported case of venous stent thrombosis due to HITT in May–Thurner syndrome. This case underscores the importance of early recognition and prompt management of HITT using alternative anticoagulants like fondaparinux to prevent complications such as venous limb gangrene. Further randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fondaparinux in HITT.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated mucormycosis of the maxilla emerged as a significant concern in India during the second wave of the pandemic, necessitating surgical interventions such as maxillectomy. This study investigated the quality of life following prosthodontic rehabilitation with interim obturators in patients who underwent bilateral total maxillectomy due to COVID-19-associated mucormycosis of the jaws. Methods: The study was conducted using questionnaire-based interviews administered by a single investigator employing the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) and Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS) questionnaires. Responses were evaluated on a Likert scale. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0 for Windows. A significance level of 5% was applied to all tests. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and chi-square tests were utilized to compare categorical and quantitative variables across groups. Responses to the questionnaires were recorded on numerical Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 for OFS and 0 to 4 for OHIP-14. The mean OHIP-14 and OFS scores were compared between the pre-rehabilitation and post-rehabilitation stages. Results: A comparison between the pre-rehabilitation and post-rehabilitation scores from the OHIP-14 questionnaire revealed a significant difference (p= 0.001). The OFS results indicated significant improvements across all domains following the use of obturators. Conclusion Interim obturators play a vital role in improving speech, swallowing, and mastication during the recovery period for patients who have undergone bilateral total maxillectomy. Despite the altered anatomy resulting from the resection, patients adapted effectively and exhibited improvements in their social, psychological, and mental health.