Objective:To investigate the learning curve for a five-step procedure, namely, a transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic transabdominal diaphragmatic approach, for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.Methods:In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed relevant clinical data of 66 patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who had undergone the five-step procedure performed by the same surgeon in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from May 2017 to April 2023. The learning curve were plotted using cumulative summation analysis and selected indicators, including intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, time to first flatus, time to first tolerance of liquid food, length of hospital stay, and incidence of perioperative complications at different stages were compared. The data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 statistical software. Numerical data are presented as cases (%) and data were analyzed using the χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test. Normally distributed measurement data are presented as x±s, and independent sample t-testing was performed for inter group comparison. Non-normally distributed measurement data are presented as M( Q1, Q3) and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for inter group comparison. Results:The five-step procedure had been successfully completed without switching to open surgery in all 66 study patients. There were no perioperative deaths, blood loss was 100 (50, 200) mL and duration of surgery 329.4±87.3 minutes. The equation of optimal fit for the duration of surgery was y=0.031x 3-4.4757x 2+164.97x-264.4 ( P<0.001, R2=0.9797). The cumulative summation learning curve reached a vertex when 25 surgical procedures had accumulated. Using 25 cases as the cut-off, we divided the learning curves into learning and proficiency periods and patients into learning (25) and proficiency period groups (41). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, history of abdominal surgery, comorbidities, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, maximum tumor diameter, surgical procedure, or T and N stage of tumor ( P>0.05). The following factors differed significantly (all P<0.05) between the learning and proficiency stages: in the latter there was less intraoperative blood loss (100 [50, 100] ml vs. 200 [100, 200] ml, U=-3.940, P<0.001), shorter duration of surgery ([289.8±50.7] minutes vs. [394.4±96.0] minutes, t=5.034, P<0.001), more mediastinal lymph nodes removed (5 [2, 8] vs. 2 [1, 5], U=-2.518, P=0.012), earlier time to first flatus (2 [2, 3] days vs. 4 [3, 6] days, U=-4.016, P<0.001), earlier time to first tolerance of liquid food (5 [4, 6] days vs. 7 [6, 8] days, U=-2.922, P=0.003), shorter duration of hospital stay (8 [8, 10] vs. 10 [9, 12] days, U=-2.028, P=0.043). The incidence of surgical complications did not differ significantly between the two groups ( P=0.238). Conclusion:Satisfactory results can be achieved with the five-step procedure for patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction once 25 procedures have been performed.

Objective:To explore the application of anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance in total laparoscopic overlap method for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy.Methods:Overlap esophagojejunostomy with anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance is suitable for patients with advanced gastric cancer (clinical stage: cT1b~4aN0~3M0) and esophageal invasion <3 cm, who underwent radical total gastrectomy+ overlap esophagojejunostomy. The main operation procedure was performed as follows: A titanium clip was used for fixation of the full anterior wall of esophagus before overlap esophagojejunostomy, and the side‐to‐side esophagojejunostomy was performed with the linear stapler under the guidance of gastric tube. Then the titanium clip was removed after confirming that the correct cavity was entered. Finally, the common outlet was closed by two barbed sutures. A descriptive case series study was conducted. The clinical data of patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and overlap esophagojejunostomy with anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance in Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese medicine and the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese medicine from May 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.Results:A total of 42 patients were collected, and all of them were successfully completed laparoscopic total radical gastrectomy without conversion to laparotomy or perioperative death. The esophagojejunostomy time, operative time, intraoperative blood loss was 17(5‐25) minutes, (258.8±38.0) minutes and 50(20‐200) ml, respectively. The incidence of esophageal false lumen was 0%, and there were no intraoperative complications. The time of gastric tube removal, initial fluid diet intake and the duration of postoperative hospital were 2(1‐5) , 4(1‐8) and 8(4‐21) days, respectively. There were no postoperative anastomotic hemorrhage, anastomotic stenosis and other related complications. One patient (2.38%) developed a Clavien‐Dindo IIIb complication, which was abdominal hemorrhage after operation. The second surgical exploration confirmed that the patient was bleeding due to gastroduodenal artery rupture. After intraoperative suture hemostasis, fluid expansion, blood transfusion and other treatments, the patient was discharged on the 15th day after the operation. Three patients (7.14%) developed Clavien‐Dindo grade II complications, including anastomotic leakage, chylous leakage and pulmonary infection, and were discharged after conservative treatment such as anti‐infection and prolonged retention of drainage tube.Conclusions:Laparoscopic overlap method for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with anterior esophageal wall fixation and gastric tube guidance can shorten the time of esophagojejunostomy and prevent the occurrence of false lumen, and do not increase anastomose‐related complications.

The close relationship between gastric cancer (GC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has garnered significant attention. On one hand, T2DM may play a role in the development and progression of GC, correlating with poor patient outcomes. On the other hand, after radical surgery for GC, T2DM can be effectively managed, potentially improving tumor prognosis. In recent years, bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) has revolutionized T2DM treatment for obese and overweight patients. Comparative analyses reveal similarities between surgical approaches for gastric cancer and BMS, leading to the emergence of the onco-metabolic surgery (OMS) concept, which suggests that radical tumor resection and T2DM remission in GC patients can be potentially achieved through a single procedure. However, there are notable differences between OMS and BMS, including target populations, surgical details, and perioperative management. Therefore, optimizing the application of the OMS concept in GC patients holds significant clinical importance. This article provides a review to facilitate the better implementation of this concept in practice.

Objective:To investigate the learning curve for a five-step procedure, namely, a transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic transabdominal diaphragmatic approach, for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.Methods:In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed relevant clinical data of 66 patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who had undergone the five-step procedure performed by the same surgeon in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from May 2017 to April 2023. The learning curve were plotted using cumulative summation analysis and selected indicators, including intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, time to first flatus, time to first tolerance of liquid food, length of hospital stay, and incidence of perioperative complications at different stages were compared. The data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 statistical software. Numerical data are presented as cases (%) and data were analyzed using the χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test. Normally distributed measurement data are presented as x±s, and independent sample t-testing was performed for inter group comparison. Non-normally distributed measurement data are presented as M( Q1, Q3) and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for inter group comparison. Results:The five-step procedure had been successfully completed without switching to open surgery in all 66 study patients. There were no perioperative deaths, blood loss was 100 (50, 200) mL and duration of surgery 329.4±87.3 minutes. The equation of optimal fit for the duration of surgery was y=0.031x 3-4.4757x 2+164.97x-264.4 ( P<0.001, R2=0.9797). The cumulative summation learning curve reached a vertex when 25 surgical procedures had accumulated. Using 25 cases as the cut-off, we divided the learning curves into learning and proficiency periods and patients into learning (25) and proficiency period groups (41). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, history of abdominal surgery, comorbidities, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, maximum tumor diameter, surgical procedure, or T and N stage of tumor ( P>0.05). The following factors differed significantly (all P<0.05) between the learning and proficiency stages: in the latter there was less intraoperative blood loss (100 [50, 100] ml vs. 200 [100, 200] ml, U=-3.940, P<0.001), shorter duration of surgery ([289.8±50.7] minutes vs. [394.4±96.0] minutes, t=5.034, P<0.001), more mediastinal lymph nodes removed (5 [2, 8] vs. 2 [1, 5], U=-2.518, P=0.012), earlier time to first flatus (2 [2, 3] days vs. 4 [3, 6] days, U=-4.016, P<0.001), earlier time to first tolerance of liquid food (5 [4, 6] days vs. 7 [6, 8] days, U=-2.922, P=0.003), shorter duration of hospital stay (8 [8, 10] vs. 10 [9, 12] days, U=-2.028, P=0.043). The incidence of surgical complications did not differ significantly between the two groups ( P=0.238). Conclusion:Satisfactory results can be achieved with the five-step procedure for patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction once 25 procedures have been performed.

Objective:To explore the application of anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance in total laparoscopic overlap method for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy.Methods:Overlap esophagojejunostomy with anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance is suitable for patients with advanced gastric cancer (clinical stage: cT1b~4aN0~3M0) and esophageal invasion <3 cm, who underwent radical total gastrectomy+ overlap esophagojejunostomy. The main operation procedure was performed as follows: A titanium clip was used for fixation of the full anterior wall of esophagus before overlap esophagojejunostomy, and the side‐to‐side esophagojejunostomy was performed with the linear stapler under the guidance of gastric tube. Then the titanium clip was removed after confirming that the correct cavity was entered. Finally, the common outlet was closed by two barbed sutures. A descriptive case series study was conducted. The clinical data of patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and overlap esophagojejunostomy with anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance in Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese medicine and the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese medicine from May 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.Results:A total of 42 patients were collected, and all of them were successfully completed laparoscopic total radical gastrectomy without conversion to laparotomy or perioperative death. The esophagojejunostomy time, operative time, intraoperative blood loss was 17(5‐25) minutes, (258.8±38.0) minutes and 50(20‐200) ml, respectively. The incidence of esophageal false lumen was 0%, and there were no intraoperative complications. The time of gastric tube removal, initial fluid diet intake and the duration of postoperative hospital were 2(1‐5) , 4(1‐8) and 8(4‐21) days, respectively. There were no postoperative anastomotic hemorrhage, anastomotic stenosis and other related complications. One patient (2.38%) developed a Clavien‐Dindo IIIb complication, which was abdominal hemorrhage after operation. The second surgical exploration confirmed that the patient was bleeding due to gastroduodenal artery rupture. After intraoperative suture hemostasis, fluid expansion, blood transfusion and other treatments, the patient was discharged on the 15th day after the operation. Three patients (7.14%) developed Clavien‐Dindo grade II complications, including anastomotic leakage, chylous leakage and pulmonary infection, and were discharged after conservative treatment such as anti‐infection and prolonged retention of drainage tube.Conclusions:Laparoscopic overlap method for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with anterior esophageal wall fixation and gastric tube guidance can shorten the time of esophagojejunostomy and prevent the occurrence of false lumen, and do not increase anastomose‐related complications.

The close relationship between gastric cancer (GC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has garnered significant attention. On one hand, T2DM may play a role in the development and progression of GC, correlating with poor patient outcomes. On the other hand, after radical surgery for GC, T2DM can be effectively managed, potentially improving tumor prognosis. In recent years, bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) has revolutionized T2DM treatment for obese and overweight patients. Comparative analyses reveal similarities between surgical approaches for gastric cancer and BMS, leading to the emergence of the onco-metabolic surgery (OMS) concept, which suggests that radical tumor resection and T2DM remission in GC patients can be potentially achieved through a single procedure. However, there are notable differences between OMS and BMS, including target populations, surgical details, and perioperative management. Therefore, optimizing the application of the OMS concept in GC patients holds significant clinical importance. This article provides a review to facilitate the better implementation of this concept in practice.

Objective:To investigate the application value of laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) based on purse-string suture for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer.Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 14 patients undergoing laparoscopic NOSES based on purse-string suture for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer in The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from October 2022 to June 2023 were collected. There were 8 males and 6 females, aged (56±10)years. Observation indicators: (1) surgical conditions; (2) postoperative conditions; (3) follow-up. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD. Count data were described as absolute numbers. Results:(1) Surgical conditions. All patients underwent laparoscopic NOSES based on purse-string suture for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer successfully, without conversion to open surgery. The operation time of 14 patients was (162±32)minutes, and the volume of intraoperative blood loss was (22±12)mL. (2) Postoperative conditions. Time to postoperative first out-of-bed activity, time to postoperative first flatus, time to postoperative first drinking, time to postoperative initial liquid food intake, duration of postoperative hospital stay of 14 patients were (1.6±0.7)days, (2.1±0.6)days, (2.4±0.6)days, (3.8±1.0)days, (6.0±0.9)days, respectively. None of patient had perioperative complications such as postoperative anastomotic leakage and bleeding. (3) Follow-up. All 14 patients were followed up for (9.7±1.9)months. There was no postoperative recurrence, metastasis or death in 14 pati-ents.Conclusion:The laparoscopic NOSES based on purse-string suture can be used for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer, which is safe and feasible.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of single-port and mini-three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (MTP-SG) for obesity.Methods:The propensity score matching and retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 364 obesity patients in the Chinese Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Database who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University from July 2016 to December 2023 were collected. There were 79 males and 285 females, aged (31±9)years. Of 364 patients, 67 cases undergoing single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SP-SG) were divided into the SP group, and 297 cases undergoing MTP-SG were divided into the MTP group. Propensity score matching was done by the 1∶1 nearest neighbor matching method. The clamp value was set as 0.1. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean± SD, and t test was used for comparison between groups. Measurement data with skewed distribution were expressed as M( Q1, Q1), and the rank sum test was used for comparison between groups. Count data were expressed as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Results:(1) Propensity score matching and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching. Of 364 patients, 126 cases were successfully matched, including 63 cases in the SP group and 63 cases in the MTP group. After propensity score matching, the confounding bias of gender, body mass, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist hip ratio were eliminated between the two groups. (2) Intraoperative and post-operative conditions. Both groups of patients successfully completed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. After propensity score matching, the operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, number of postoperative painkillers used, number of postoperative antiemetics used, duration of postoperative hospital stay, duration of total hospital stay, surgical cost, and total hospitalization cost of the 63 pati-ents in SP group were 101(90,120)minutes, 10(10,10)mL, 1.0(1.0,2.5)times, 3.0(1.0,5.0)times, 4(3,5)days, 7(5,8)days, 4.1(3.5,4.3) ten thousand yuan, and (6.4±0.8) ten thousand yuan, respectively. The above indicators of the 27 patients in MTP group were 100(90,120)minutes, 10(10,15)mL, 2.0(1.0,4.0)times, 4.0(3.0,5.0)times, 3(3,4)days, 5(5,6)days, 3.2(2.8,4.2) ten thousand yuan, and (5.8±0.8) ten thousand yuan, respectively. There were significant differences in number of postoperative antiemetics used, duration of postoperative hospital stay, duration of total hospital stay and total hospitalization cost between the two groups ( Z=-2.39, -3.93, -3.03, t=4.04, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, number of post-operative painkillers used and surgical cost between the two groups ( Z=-0.49, -1.00, -1.23, -1.47, P>0.05). (3) Follow-up. One hundred and ninety five of the 364 patients conducted postoperative 1 month follow-up, including 25 patients in the SP group and 170 patients in the MTP group, and no patient experienced complications such as gastric leakage, infection, or incisional hernia. Both groups of patients had good surgical incisions. After propensity score matching, the change in BMI (ΔBMI), percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) of 24 patients in the SP group were (3.7±1.4)kg/m 2, 11.0%±3.0%, 52.6%±30.0%, respectively. The above indicators of 40 patients in the MTP group were (4.1±1.3)kg/m 2, 11.1%±2.8%, 41.8%±19.1%, respectively. Patients who conducted the postoperative 12 month follow-up were 21 and 131 in the SP group and the MTP group, respectively. After propensity score matching, the ΔBMI, %TWL and %EWL of 15 patients in the SP group were (8.7±4.1)kg/m 2, 26.2%±9.8%, 130.0%±45.1%, respectively. The above indicators of 36 patients in the MTP group were (9.8±4.0)kg/m 2, 27.2%± 8.7%, 107.1%±40.7%, respectively. Conclusion:Both SP-SG and MTP-SG can be used to treat obesity patients and achieve satisfactory short-term results.

At present, obesity and overweight patients are increasing year by year in the world. Bariatric surgery is the most effective method for treating obesity at present. Due to its high risk, large trauma, irreversible operation, high cost and patient preference, the overall acceptance degree is not high at present. With the development of endoscopic technology and materials and equipment, various surgical methods emerge one after another. They are less invasive, reversible and similar to traditional bariatric surgery in weight loss effect. They are more and more widely used in obesity and metabolism. Depending on the site of the endoscopic intervention: The authors review the advances in endoscopic bariatric surgery for obesity, including the different principles of surgery and the effects of bariatric surgery on different sites.

Bariatric surgery has been proven to be the most effective intervention for the treatment of obesity and obesity-related complications. In recent decades, medical experts as well as scholars in China have been actively promoting and pushing the development of bariatric surgery, and conducting a series of clinical and basic research. As a result of their unremitting efforts, research in the field of bariatric surgery in China has developed extremely rapidly. The authors examined the overview of literature research in the field of bariatric surgery in China through bibliometric analysis, and analyzed the current status, hot spots, trends, and frontiers of research in this field, with the aim of providing references for future research and development.