OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of TiRobot-assisted minimally invasive treatment for fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) in elderly patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 176 patients with FFP who were admitted between July 2018 and July 2024 and met the selection criteria. Among them, 95 patients underwent TiRobot-assisted closed reduction and minimally invasive cannulated screw fixation (robot group), while 81 patients underwent traditional open reduction and plate screw fixation (control group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, fracture classification, disease duration, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). The following parameters were recorded and compared between the two groups, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion rate, volume of intraoperative blood transfusion, maximum incision length, hospital stay, maximum residual displacement, reduction quality, fracture healing time, incidence of complications, VAS scores, Majeed pelvic function scores, and functional grading. RESULTS: All surgeries in both groups successfully completed. The robot group exhibited significantly shorter operation time, reduced intraoperative blood loss, lower intraoperative transfusion rate, smaller volume of intraoperative blood transfusion, shorter maximum incision length, and shorter hospital stay compared to the control group ( P<0.05). In the robot group, a total of 14 INFIX internal fixation frames and 280 cannulated screws were implanted, among which 250 screws were rated as excellent, 17 as good, and 13 as poor, resulting in a screw placement excellent and good rate of 95.36%. Radiological review revealed that the excellent and good rate of reduction quality was in 91.58% (87/95) in the robot group and 81.48% (66/81) in the control group, with no significant difference in postoperative maximum residual fracture displacement or reduction quality between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients in both groups were followed up 12-66 months, with an average of 28.9 months, and there was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The fracture healing time in the robot group was significantly shorter than that in the control group ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, both groups showed significant improvement in VAS scores compared to preoperative values ( P<0.05); the change values of VAS scores, Majeed scores, and the excellent and good rate of Majeed pelvic function were significantly higher in the robot group than in the control group ( P<0.05). Regarding postoperative complications, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gait changes, secondary surgeries, heterotopic ossification, incision infections, walking difficulties, internal fixation failure, or mortality rates ( P>0.05); however, the incidence of delayed wound healing was significantly lower in the robot group than in the control group ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION TiRobot-assisted minimally invasive treatment of elderly FFP is superior to traditional open reduction and internal fixation in terms of surgical trauma control, postoperative rehabilitation speed, and functional recovery.
Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Female ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation* ; Pelvic Bones/surgery* ; Aged ; Bone Screws ; Bone Plates ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Aged, 80 and over ; Treatment Outcome ; Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery* ; Operative Time ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Fracture Healing ; Fractures, Bone/surgery*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and advantages of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Between October 2022 and June 2023, a total of 59 patients with severe knee osteoarthritis resulting in varus were treated with total knee arthroplasty, aged from 59 to 81 years with an average (70.90±4.63) years, including 19 mals and 40 females. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical method used:28 patients in the robot group and 31 patients in the traditional group. The robot group consisted of 8 males and 20 femalse patients, with an average age of (70.54±4.80) years and an average disease duration of (14.89±8.72) months. The traditional group consisted of 11 males and 20 females patients, with an average age of (71.39±4.5) years and an average disease duration of (12.32±6.73) months. The operative duration, amount of bleeding during the operation, postoperative activity time after the operation, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and complications were compared between the two groups before and after the operation. Lateral tibia component (LTC), frontal tibia component (FTC), frontal femoral component (FFC) and lateral femoral component (LFC) were measured 6 months after operation Additionally, the degree of knee joint motility, American Knee Society score (KSS), and visual analogue scale(VAS) were compared before and after the operation. RESULTS: All patients had gradeⅠwound healing without any complications, and all patients were followed up for 6 to 8 months, with an average of (6.5±1.5) months. There were no significant differences preoperative imaging evaluation indexes (including HKA, LDFA, and MPTA), preoperative knee mobility, preoperative VAS, and preoperative KSS between the two groups (P>0.05). Comparing the operation time (109.11±7.16) min vs. (83.90±7.85) min, length of the incision (16.60±2.33) cm vs. (14.47±1.41) cm, intraoperative bleeding (106.93±6.15) ml vs. (147.97±7.62) ml, postoperative activity time (17.86±1.84) h vs. (21.77±2.68) h, between the two groups showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There were significant differences in FFC (88.96±0.84)° vs. (87.93±1.09)° and LFC (88.57±1.10)° vs. (87.16±1.2)° between the two groups at 6 months after operation (P<0.05). The robotic group 1, 3, 6 months after KSS (75.96±3.96), (81.53±3.78), (84.50±3.29) scores, VAS (3.68±0.67), (2.43±0.79), (0.54±0.64), knee joint mobility (113.32±4.72) °, (123.93±3.99) °, (135.36±2.34) °;Traditional group KSS (73.77±4.18), (76.48±3.60), (80.19±3.28) scores, VAS (4.16±1.04), (3.03±0.75), (1.42±0.76) scores, knee joint mobility (109.19±6.95) °, (119.94±6.08) °, (134.48±2.14) °. Compared to before surgery, both groups showed significant improvement in KSS, VAS and knee mobility during the three follow-up visits (P<0.001). Additionally, postoperative HKA (180.39±1.95)° vs. (178.52±2.23)°, LDFA (89.67±0.63) ° vs. (89.63±0.63)°, and MPTA (89.44±0.55)° vs. (89.29±0.60)° were significantly improved in both groups compared to before surgery (P<0.001). The robotic group had higher KSS than the traditional group at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). The robotic group also had lower VAS than the traditional group at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). Furthermore, knee mobility was higher in the robotic group than those in the traditional group at 1 and 6 months after surgery (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSION Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is a safe and effective method for total knee replacement. The use of robotics can improve the limb axis and prosthesis alignment for patients with preoperative varus deformity, resulting in better clinical and imaging outcomes compared to the conventional group.
Humans ; Female ; Male ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods* ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology* ; Aged, 80 and over ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*

OBJECTIVE: To explore the differences in clinical efficacy between enhanced workflows and express workflows in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty(THA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 46 patients who underwent robotic-assisted THA between November 2020 and May 2021. They were divided into the enhanced workflows group and the express workflows group based on the surgical methods. There were 20 patients in the enhanced workflows group, including 11 males and 9 females;aged from 51 to 78 years old with an average of (67.30±7.52) years old. The BMI ranged from 18.24 to 24.03 kg·m^-2 with an average of(23.80±3.01) kg·m^-2. There were 26 patients in the express workflows group, including 12 males and 14 females;aged from 57 to 84 years old with a mean age of (67.58±7.29) years old, and their BMI ranged from 19.72 to 30.08 kg·m^-2 with an average of (24.41 ±2.92) kg·m^-2. The operation time, hospital stay, and perioperative complications of the patients were recorded. The postoperative acetabular prosthesis anteversion angle, abduction angle, limb length, and offset distance data were measured. The Harris hip score at the latest follow-up was recorded. RESULTS: All patients completed the surgery as planned and were followed up, with the follow-up period ranging from 47 to 54 months with a mean of (49.78±1.85) months and the length of hospital stay ranging from 2 to 11 days with an average of (6.57±1.82 ) days. The operation time of enhanced workflows group was (93.41±16.41) minutes, which was longer than that of the express workflow groups (75.19±18.36) minutes, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In enhanced workflows group, the postoperative acetabular anteversion angle was (19.20±4.46)°, the limb length discrepancy was (-1.55±9.13) mm, and changes of the offset was (-5.15±6.77) mm. The corresponding values in express workflows group were (20.46±3.29)°, (2.19±4.39) mm, and (-2.39±4.34) mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in these indicators between the two groups(P>0.05). One patient in the enhanced workflows group developed deep venous thrombosis after surgery. No cases of dislocation or periprosthetic infection. At the latest follow-up, all patients had well-positioned prostheses without loosening. Harris hip score was (90.50±1.67) points in enhanced workflows group and (90.73±2.36) points in the express workflows group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION The clinical efficacy of robot assisted total hip arthroplasty technology is satisfactory. The enhanced workflows will increase the surgical time. For patients with normal anatomical hip joint disease, this study did not find significant advantages in joint stability and functional scoring for the enhanced workflows.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Male ; Female ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Aged, 80 and over ; Workflow ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the early clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty (RFA-TKA) and manual mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MMA-TKA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 58 patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between February 2024 and January 2025. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into the RFA-TKA group and the MMA-TKA group.There were 26 patients in the RFA-TKA group, including 7 males and 19 females, aged from 58 to 80 years old with an average of (69.08±5.93) years old;robotic-assisted functional alignment was adopted in this group. The MMA-TKA group consisted of 32 patients, including 9 males and 23 females, aged from 53 to 78 years old with an average of (66.59±7.76) years old;manual mechanical alignment was used in this group. Surgical indicators of the two groups were compared, including operation time, hemoglobin loss, and soft tissue release. Postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated using Knee Society score-the knee dcore (KSS-K) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for knee pain. Postoperative radiological measurements micluded, the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for more than 3 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time between two groups (P>0.05). The hemoglobin loss in the RFA-TKA group on the first day after surgery was (5.08±4.07) g·L^-1, which was less than that of the MMA-TKA group (14.03±12.49) g·L^-1, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The number of patients who underwent soft tissue release in the RFA-TKA group was 5 cases, which was less than 32 cases in the MMA-TKA group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). At 3 months after surgery, the HKA angle (177.71±1.05)°, mLDFA (88.30±0.64)° and MPTA (87.53±1.47)° of the RFA-TKA group were all smaller than those of the MMA-TKA group (179.19±0.57)°, (89.14±0.59)° and(89.27±0.62)° respectively, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). The KSS-K of the RFA-TKA group was (92.50±3.64) points, which was higher than that of the MMA-TKA group(86.22±3.38) points, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). For the VAS score of knee pain during walking, the RFA-TKA group (0.31±0.62) points was lower than the MMA-TKA group (1.03±1.12) points, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSION Domestic robot-assisted functionally aligned TKA effectively restores the constitutional alignment of the lower limb, reduces the need for soft tissue release, minimizes intraoperative blood loss, alleviates postoperative pain, and achieve superior early clinical outcomes.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods* ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology* ; Lower Extremity/physiopathology*

OBJECTIVE: To explore and analyze the clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted versus traditional total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: A total of 186 patients with end-stage hip joint diseases treated from January 2023 to April 2025 were selected as the research subjects. Among them, 85 patients were screened out using propensity score matching and divided into two groups according to different treatment methods:manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA) group (mTHA group) and robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) group (rTHA group). In mTHA group, there were 50 patients, including 18 males and 32 females, age ranged from 37 to 78 years old with a mean of (60.12±10.93) years old;body mass index (BMI) ranged from 16.6 to 32.0 kg·m^-2 with an average of (23.98±3.78) kg·m^-2;27 cases involved the left hip, and 23 cases involved the right hip. In the rTHA group, there were 35 patients, including 14 males and 21 females, age ranged from 31 to 76 years old with an average of (57.14±12.18) years old;the BMI ranged from 17.1 to 33.0 kg·m^-2 with a mean of (22.76±2.54) kg·m^-2;13 cases involved the left hip, and 22 cases involved the right hip. The following parameters were analyzed and compared between the two groups:acetabular anteversion angle, acetabular abduction angle, difference in combined offset, difference in lower limb length, proportion of acetabula located in the Lewinnek safe zone after surgery, operation time, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) score, and Harris hip score (HHS). RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 3 to 9 months, with an average of (6.8±1.3) months. In rTHA group and mTHA group, the abduction angles were (40.73±4.62)° and (40.95±4.71)° respectively;the differences in combined offset were (0.42±0.28) mm and (0.60±0.23) mm respectively;the WOMAC scores were(20.9±5.4) and (20.2±4.6) respectively;and the VAS were (1.1±1.0) and (1.0±0.8) respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). However, statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in the following aspects(P<0.05):the differences in lower limb length were (3.17±0.15) mm and (5.28±0.47) mm respectively;the postoperative acetabular anteversion angles were(22.84±2.83)° and (25.72±3.29)° respectively;the HHS were (80.7±5.5) and (74.8±6.3) respectively;and the operation times were (148.20±46.82) minutes and (81.84±18.76) minutes respectively. CONCLUSION Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty demonstrates superior implant accuracy and improved early functional recovery compared with traditional manual THA. Nevertheless, it is associated with significantly longer operation time. Long-term prosthesis survival rate requires further follow-up verification.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Adult ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term clinical outcomes and radiographic results of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) using the ROSA robot with those of traditional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 55 patients who underwent unilateral TKA due to end-stage knee osteoarthritis(KOA), defined as Kellgren-Lawrence grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ, between June 2024 and December 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach:the RATKA group and the conventional TKA group. The RATKA group included 25 patients, consisting of 6 males and 19 females, aged from 46 to 84 years old with a mean of ( 65.20±1.93 ) years old. Among them, 11 cases involved the left knee and 14 cases involved the right knee. The traditional TKA group included 30 patients, consisting of 5 males and 25 females, aged from 57 to 85 years old with an average of (68.73±1.36) years old. Among them, 13 cases involved the left knee and 17 cases involved the right knee. Operation time, total perioperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Radiographic evaluation included preoperative and postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, and postoperative lateral tibial component angle (LTC), frontal femoral component angle (FFC), sagittal lateral femoral component angle(LFC), and frontal tibial component (FTC), for the assessment of lower extremity mechanical axis and prosthesis position. The American Knee Society score(KSS), visual analogue scale(VAS) for pain, and range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint preoperatively and postoperatively were compared between the two groups to evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy. RESULTS: All surgeries in both groups were successfully completed without intraoperative vascular or nerve injury. Primary wound healing (GradeⅠ) was achieved in all cases, and no infection occurred during follow-up. A total of 55 patients completed the follow-up, with a follow-up duration ranging from 3 to 6 months with a mean of (4.0±1.1) months. The average operation time was (106.56±9.70) minutes in the RATKA group and (90.10±10.97) minutes in the traditional TKA group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the total perioperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05). Postoperative X-ray examinations showed that the prosthesis was well-positioned in all patients of both groups, with no signs of prosthesis loosening or dislocation. On the 1st day postoperatively, the HKA and FFC angle in the RATKA group were (179.25±2.50)° and (89.24±1.58)°, while those in the traditional TKA group were (177.68±2.73)° and (88.25±1.91)°, both showing statistically significant differences(P<0.05). In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences in the FTC, LTC, or LFC angles between the two groups(P>0.05). At 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, the ROM values were (110.68±4.92)° and (117.28±4.91)° in the RATKA group, and (106.25±6.89)° and (113.43±7.91)° in the traditional TKA group, both showing statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Nevertheless, there were no statistically significant differences in the VAS (both at rest and during movement) or KSS between the two groups at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively(P>0.05). Compared with the preoperative data, both groups showed significant improvements in the HKA angle, VAS(at rest and during movement), knee ROM, and KSS (both clinical and functional scores) postoperatively, with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). CONCLUSION Compared to traditional TKA, ROSA robotic system-assisted TKA in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis achieved superior accuracy in prosthesis positioning and lower limb mechanical axis restoration, showing satisfactory clinical outcomes. Although short-term outcomes are favorable, long-term clinical efficacy requires further investigation.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods* ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Knee Joint/physiopathology*

OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess the differences in gait parameters and clinical efficacy between HURWA robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty(TKA) and MAKO robotic-assisted TKA during the 1-year postoperative follow-up period. METHODS: From November 2023 to March 2024, 40 patients with unilateral knee osteoarthritis were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups:HURWA robotic-assisted TKA group(HURWA group) and MAKO robotic-assisted TKA group (MAKO group) using a random number table. In the HURWA group, there were 20 patients, comprising 5 males and 15 females, with an age range of 59 to 79 years old with a mean age of (69.45±4.36) years old, and body mass index(BMI) ranging from 22.96 to 33.87 kg·m^-2 with a mean BMI of (27.28±3.12) kg·m^-2. In the MAKO group, there were also 20 patients, consisting of 4 males and 16 females, with an age range of 58 to 80 years old with an average of (67.50±6.88) years old, BMI ranging from 25.39 to 29.30 kg·m-2 with an average of(26.86 ±1.23) kg·m-2. To comprehensively evaluate the improvement in knee joint function, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and American Knee Society score (KSS) were used for clinical efficacy evaluation. In gait analysis, an innovative computer vision-based human pose estimation framework, MediaPipe, was used to quantitatively measure the spatiotemporal parameters (such as walking speed, step frequency, stride length, step width, etc.) and kinematic parameters (such as gait cycle, stance time, stance phase, swing time, swing phase, knee joint active flexion angle, etc.) of both groups preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. A dynamic evaluation of the maximum hip flexion and knee flexion angles during functional activities (such as squatting) was also conducted to fully reflect the recovery of patients' motor function. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the WOMAC and KSS scores between the HURWA robotic-assisted TKA group and the MAKO robotic-assisted TKA group preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively (P>0.05). In terms of gait function, there were no significant differences in the spatiotemporal parameters (including walking speed, step frequency, stride length, step width, etc.) and kinematic parameters(such as gait cycle, stance time, stance phase, swing time, swing phase, knee joint active flexion angle, etc.) between the two groups preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively(P>0.05). CONCLUSION Both HURWA robot-assisted TKA and MAKO robot-assisted TKA demoonstrated equivalent outcones in terms of functional recovery and gait improvement 1 year postoperatively.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods* ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Gait ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology* ; Aged, 80 and over ; Knee Joint/physiopathology* ; Motion Capture

OBJECTIVE: Investigation on the clinical application of HURWA robot and Smith & Nephew Cori robot in total knee arthroplasty(TKA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 84 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA) between June 2023 and March 2025. According to the different robotic systems used, the patients were divided into the domestic HUARUN robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty group (HRATKA group) and the Smith & Nephew Cori robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty group (CRATKA group). There were 42 patients in the HRATKA group, including 16 males and 26 females; the age ranged from 56 to 73 years old, with an average of (64.70±8.30) years old;the body mass index (BMI) was (25.10±2.30) kg·m^-2;21 cases were on the right side and 21 cases on the left side;in terms of Kellgren-Lawrence(K-L) classification, there were 15 cases of Grade Ⅲ and 27 cases of Grade Ⅳ;the disease duration ranged from 3 to 25 years, with an average of (15.5±7.5) years. The CRATKA group also included 42 patients, with 14 males and 28 females;the age ranged from 58 to 74 years old, with an average of (65.60±7.50) years old;the BMI was (24.50±2.70) kg·m^-2; 20 cases were on the right side and 22 cases on the left side;regarding K-L classification, there were 11 cases of Grade Ⅲ and 31 cases of Grade Ⅳ;the disease duration ranged from 2 to 26 years, with an average of (16.5±8.8) years. Collect general data of all patients, including age, gender, height, weight, surgical site, K-L classification, incision length, and operation time. To evaluate prosthesis position, compare the frontal tibia component (FTC) angle, lateral femoral component (LFC) angle, lateral tibia component (LTC) angle, and frontal femoral component angle between the two groups of patients after surgery. Measure the deviation of the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle to assess lower limb alignment. Additionally, compare the following indicators between the two groups:Knee Society Score (KSS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, knee range of motion (ROM), hemoglobin (HB) level, hematocrit (HCT) level, complication rate, and in-hospital satisfaction. RESULTS: All patients successfully completed the surgery as scheduled, and all were followed up after the operation. The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 17 months with an average of (11.2±6.1) months. There were 4 cases of venous thrombosis in the HRATKA group and 3 cases in the CRATKA group;each group had 2 cases of wound exudation. No mechanical-related complications, pulmonary embolism, or other severe complications occurred. Comparison of the incision length and hospital stay between the HRATKA group and the CRATKA group showed no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The operation time in the HRATKA group was (96.80±7.10) minutes, which was longer than that in the CRATKA group (90.10±8.80) minutes, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the HRATKA group, the HKA angle was (178.93±1.11) degree, the FFC angle was (89.00±0.91)°, and the LFC angle was (7.31±2.17) degree;the corresponding values in the CRATKA group were (178.05±1.34)°, (87.88±1.74)°, and (10.60±2.84) degree respectively. The differences in these three indicators between the two groups were all statistically significant (P<0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the FTC angle or LTC angle between the two groups (P>0.05). There was also no statistically significant difference in the total perioperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). At 3 days after surgery, the VAS score for movement in the HRATKA group (5.95±1.45) points was higher than that in the CRATKA group (4.50±0.97) points, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05);at 90 days after surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in the movement VAS score between the two groups (P>0.05). Additionally, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in the KSS, ROM at 3 and 90 days after surgery, or satisfaction degree during hospitalization (all P>0.05). CONCLUSION The domestic HURWA robot demonstrates excellent performance in osteotomy efficiency and lower limb alignment recovery. The Smith & Nephew Cori robot has a significant advantage in soft tissue assessment and joint stability optimization. Both robotic systems offer high-quality surgical treatments that significantly improve short-term knee function.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation* ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery*

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate and re-evaluate the surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty(RA-TKA) compared with to conventional total knee arthroplasty(C-TKA). METHODS: Ten databases, including PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, JBI, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, were comprehensively searched from inception to September 2024. Eligible studies included systematic reviews and meta-analysis comparing the surgical outcomes of RA-TKA and C-TKA. Two independen researchers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR tool, while the certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE system. The degree of overlap among primary studies included in the systematic reviews/meta-analyses was investigated using the corrected covered area (CCA). RESULTS: A total of 15 systematic reviews/Meta-analyses were included, 5 were rateak as high quality, 1 as moderate quality, and 9 as low quality. A total of 53 pieces of evidence were identified, 11 pieces of evidence were of high quality, 19 were of moderate quality, 16 were of low quality, and 7 were of very low quality. Ten studies assessed the Knee Society score(KSS) and performed a meta-analysis. Among these, seven studies reported that there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative KSS scores between the two surgical methods. Nine studies evaluated the Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS) score, with seven indicating no statistically significant difference in HSS scores following surgery. Twelve studies examined the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score postoperatively, and five found no significant difference between the two surgical approaches. Five studies compared the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle deviation between the two groups, all of which demonstrated that the HKA angle deviation in RA-TKA was significantly lower than in C-TKA. Eight studies reported on the range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint after surgery, with six showing no statistically significant difference between the two methods. Finally, nine studies compared the duration of the surgical procedures, all of which concluded that RA-TKA required a longer operative time than C-TKA. CONCLUSION With regard to functional outcomes, no statistically significant difference was observed between RA-TKA and C-TKA. Nevertheless, RA-TKA demonstrates advantages in terms of surgical accuracy, precision, and alignment correction.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods* ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Treatment Outcome ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Systematic Reviews as Topic

Urinary incontinence is a common complication following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Urethral length has been identified as a factor affecting postoperative continence recovery. In this meta-analysis, we examined the association between use of the maximal urethral length preservation (MULP) technique and postoperative urinary continence in patients undergoing RARP. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data and calculate the odds ratio (OR) from eligible studies on continence and MULP. Six studies involving 1869 patients met the eligibility criteria. MULP was positively associated with both early continence (1 month after RARP; Z = 3.62, P = 0.003, OR = 3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68-5.73) and late continence (12 months after RARP; Z = 2.34, P = 0.019, OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.13-3.90). Oncological outcomes indicated that MULP did not increase the overall positive surgical margin rate or the positive surgical margin status at the prostate apex (both P > 0.05). In conclusion, the use of the MULP technique in RARP significantly improved both early and late postoperative continence outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes.
Humans ; Prostatectomy/adverse effects* ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Male ; Urethra/surgery* ; Urinary Incontinence/prevention & control* ; Postoperative Complications/etiology* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Organ Sparing Treatments/methods*