Enterostomy is an important means of treating colorectal cancer disease, and the nutritional problems of colorectal cancer patients with enterostomy are getting more and more attention. Malnutrition not only prolongs the hospitalization time of the patients and increases their economic burden, but also increases the incidence of patients' complications and death rate. At present, the nutritional management of colorectal cancer patients with enterostomy in China has not yet formed a consensus. Launched by the Chinese Society for Oncological Nutrition, experts with relevant backgrounds from multiple disciplines in China were invited, based on relevant references, the latest evidence and experts' clinical experience, and after several rounds of expert correspondence and expert demonstration meetings, to write the expert consensus on the whole-course nutritional management of colorectal cancer patients with enterostomy. The expert consensus centers on the teamwork model for the whole-course management of colorectal cancer patients with enterostomy, nutritional tertiary diagnosis, principles of nutritional therapy, perioperative nutritional management, nutritional management of intestinal stoma complications, and post-discharge nutritional management, aiming to provide standardized guidance for the whole-course nutritional management of patients with intestinal stoma.
Humans ; Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy* ; Consensus ; Enterostomy ; Nutritional Support ; Malnutrition ; Nutrition Therapy

Nutritional support therapy is one of the extremely important treatment methods for patients in the intensive care unit. Timely and effective nutritional support regimens can improve patients' immune function, reduce complications, and optimize clinical outcomes. Energy expenditure is influenced by multiple factors, including patients' baseline characteristics (such as physical condition, gender, age) and dynamic changes in indicators (such as body temperature, nutritional support regimens, and therapeutic interventions). The currently recognized "gold standard" for accurately assessing energy metabolism in clinical practice is the indirect calorimetry system, also known as the metabolic cart. This device monitors carbon dioxide production and oxygen consumption in real time and uses specific algorithms to estimate the metabolic proportions of the three major nutrients (carbohydrates, fats, and proteins) in energy expenditure. An appropriate nutrient ratio helps maintain the balance between supply and demand in the body's nutritional metabolism. In the management of critically ill patients, the application of the metabolic cart enables personalized nutritional therapy, avoiding over- or under-supply of energy and optimizing the use of medical resources. Furthermore, with real-time, quantitative data support from the energy metabolism monitoring system, clinicians can develop more precise nutritional intervention strategies, thereby improving patient prognosis. This article provides a systematic review of the technical features of the metabolic cart and its application value in various critical care scenarios, aiming to offer a reference for indirect calorimetry in clinical practice.
Humans ; Critical Illness/therapy* ; Nutritional Support ; Energy Metabolism ; Calorimetry, Indirect

Stress induced hyperglycemia is the body's protect response against strong (patho-physiological and/or psychological) stress, sometimes the blood glucose level is too high due to out of the body's adjustment. Renal glucose threshold (about 9 mmol/L) is a window of glucose leak from capillary to interstitial tissue. It is important to keep blood glucose level < 9 mmol/L, for reducing vascular sclerosis as well as organs hypoperfusion, meanwhile pay attention to preventing more dangerous hypoglycemia. Glucose, as the main energy substrate, should be daily supply and its metabolism should be monitored. We used to talk "nutritional support". Support is conform the physiological ability of host, but therapy is to coordinate and change pathophysiology. So, nutritional support is not equal to nutritional therapy. For critical ill patients, we need to emphasize "nutritional therapy", i.e, do not give nutritional treatment without metabolic monitoring, make up for deficiencies and avoid metabolites overloading, rational adjustment to protect and coordinate organs function.
Humans ; Blood Glucose/metabolism* ; Critical Illness/therapy* ; Hyperglycemia/therapy* ; Nutritional Support ; Glucose

Child ; Humans ; Nutrition Assessment ; Nutritional Support ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy*

The Chinese Society of Critical Care Medicine (CSCCM) has developed the clinical practice guidelines of nutrition assessment and monitoring for patients in adult intensive care unit (ICU) of China. This guideline focuses on nutrition assessment and metabolic monitoring to achieve the optimal and individualized nutrition therapy for critical ill patients. This guideline was made by experts in critical care medicine and evidence-based medicine methodology and was developed after a thorough system review and summary of relevant trials or studies published from 2000 to July 2023. A total of 18 recommendations were formed and consensus was reached through discussions and review by expert groups in critical care medicine, parenteral and enteral nutrition, and surgery. The recommendations are based on the currently available evidence and cover several key fields, including nutrition risk screening and assessment, evaluation and assessment of enteral feeding intolerance, metabolic and nutritional measurement and monitoring during nutrition therapy, and organ function evaluation related to nutrition supply. Each question was analyzed according to the PICO principle. In addition, interpretations were provided for four questions that did not reach a consensus but may have potential clinical and research value. The plan is to update this nutrition assessment and monitoring guideline using the international guideline update method within 3 to 5 years.
Adult ; Humans ; China ; Critical Care ; Critical Illness/therapy* ; Intensive Care Units ; Nutrition Assessment ; Nutritional Support/methods*

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of guidelines or formal systematic synthesis of evidence for nutrition therapy in older critically ill patients. This study is a scoping review to explore the state of evidence in this population. METHOD: MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception until 9 February 2022 for studies that enrolled critically ill patients aged ≥60 years and investigated any area of nutrition therapy. No language or study design restrictions were applied. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (5 randomised controlled trials) with 6 topics were identified: (1) nutrition screening and assessments, (2) muscle mass assessment, (3) route or timing of nutrition therapy, (4) determination of energy and protein requirements, (5) energy and protein intake, and (6) pharmaconutrition. Topics (1), (3) and (6) had similar findings among general adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Skeletal muscle mass at ICU admission was significantly lower in older versus young patients. Among older ICU patients, low muscularity at ICU admission increased the risk of adverse outcomes. Predicted energy requirements using weight-based equations significantly deviated from indirect calorimetry measurements in older vs younger patients. Older ICU patients required higher protein intake (>1.5g/kg/day) than younger patients to achieve nitrogen balance. However, at similar protein intake, older patients had a higher risk of azotaemia. CONCLUSION Based on limited evidence, assessment of muscle mass, indirect calorimetry and careful monitoring of urea level may be important to guide nutrition therapy in older ICU patients. Other nutrition recommendations for general ICU patients may be used for older patients with sound clinical discretion.
Adult ; Humans ; Aged ; Critical Illness/therapy* ; Enteral Nutrition ; Nutritional Support ; Nutritional Requirements ; Intensive Care Units ; Energy Intake

COVID-19 ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Nutrition Therapy ; Nutritional Support ; Pandemics/prevention & control*

INTRODUCTION: To improve the nutritional care and resource allocation of critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), we described their characteristics, treatment modalities and clinical outcomes, and compared their nutrition interventions against the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) recommendations. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted in 5 tertiary hospitals in Singapore. Characteristics, treatment modalities, clinical outcomes and nutrition interventions of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 who received enteral and parenteral nutrition were collected between January and May 2020. RESULTS: Among the 83 critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2, 22 (28%) were obese, 45 (54%) had hypertension, and 21 (25%) had diabetes. Neuromuscular blockade, prone therapy and dialysis were applied in 70% (58), 47% (39) and 35% (29) of the patients, respectively. Refeeding hypophosphataemia and hospital mortality occurred respectively in 6% (5) and 18% (15) of the critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2. Late enteral nutrition and cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with higher hospital mortality (adjusted relative risk 9.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25-35.99; 6.30, 95% CI 1.15-34.40, respectively). Prone therapy was not associated with a higher incidence of high gastric residual volume (≥250mL). The minimum caloric (15kcal/kg) and protein (1.2g/kg) recommendations of ASPEN were achieved in 54% (39) and 0% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION The high obesity prevalence and frequent usage of neuromuscular blockade, prone therapy, and dialysis had considerable implications for the nutritional care of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2. They also did not receive adequate calories and protein. More audits should be conducted to refine nutritional interventions and guidelines for this ever-evolving disease.
COVID-19/therapy* ; Critical Illness/therapy* ; Humans ; Nutritional Support ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Singapore/epidemiology* ; United States

Cachexia is a common complication in patients with lung cancer. It aggravates the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy, hinders the treatment plan, weakens the responsiveness of chemotherapy, reduces the quality of life, increases complications and mortality, and seriously endangers the physical and mental health of patients with lung cancer. The causes and pathogenesis of tumor cachexia are extremely complex, which makes its treatment difficult and complex. Controlling cachexia in lung cancer patients requires many means such as anti-tumor therapy, inhibition of inflammatory response, nutritional support, physical exercise, and relief of symptoms to exert the synergistic effect of multimodal therapy against multiple mechanisms of tumor cachexia. To date, there has been a consensus within the discipline that no single therapy can control the development of cachexia. Some therapies have made some progress, but they need to be implemented in combination with multimodal therapy after fully assessing the individual characteristics of lung cancer patients. This article reviews the application of drug therapy and nutritional support in lung cancer patients, and looks forward to the research direction of cachexia control in lung cancer patients.
.
Cachexia/therapy* ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Neoplasms/complications* ; Nutritional Support/adverse effects* ; Quality of Life

Severe burns can lead to sustained hypermetabolism in the body, resulting in delayed wound healing, and malnutrition, dysfunction, and even death of patients. It is critical to carry out adequate nutritional risk assessment and provide individualized nutritional support to improve the prognosis of patients with severe burns. This paper describes and summarizes precision nutrition support for severe burn patients from theory to clinical practice.
Burns/therapy* ; Humans ; Nutritional Support