OBJECTIVES: There are clinical reports of nerve injury caused by ropivacaine. The mechanism for nerve injury induced by ropivacaine has not been fully clarified. This study aims to investigate the changes of pain threshold and L₃ spinal cord genomics at 6 h and 24 h after intrathecal injection of 0.5% and 1.0% ropivacaine, and to explore the underlying mechanisms for nerve injury caused by ropivacaine. METHODS: A total of 30 male Sprague Dawley rats weighing 220-260 g were successfully implanted with microspinal catheter. The rats were randomly divided into 5 groups (each n=6): a control group (given saline), a ropivacaine group 1 and a ropivacaine group 2 (both given 1% ropivacaine), a ropivacaine group 3 and a ropivacaine group 4 (both given 0.5% ropivacaine). The rats received continuous intrathecal injection of corresponding drugs at 8.3 μL/h for 24 h via an implanted intrathecal catheter followed by 24 h-pause of injection for the ropivacaine group 2, the ropivacaine group 4 and the control group, 6 h-pause of injection for the ropivacaine group 1 and the ropivacaine group 3. For each group, the observation of behavioral change and the paw withdrawal mechanical threshold (PWMT) was conducted immediately after the injection and again after the pause of injection. After the PWMT observation, the rats were dissected to acquire L₃ spinal cords. Illumina sequencing was applied to construct gene libraries. Then the statistical methods were used to find out differentially expressed genes between the groups. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) signaling pathway analysis were conducted for those genes. Real-time RT-PCR was used to determine different expressions of some of those genes. RESULTS: Compared with control group, the PWMT got higher in the ropivacaine group 1-4 and was positively correlated with concentration, negatively correlated with discontinuation duration. Compared with control group, the ropivacaine group 1 had 488 differentially expressed genes, of which 456 were up-regulated and 32 were down-regulated; the ropivacaine group 2 had 1 194 differentially expressed genes, of which 1 092 were up-regulated and 102 were down-regulated; the ropivacaine group 3 had 518 differentially expressed genes, of which 384 were up-regulated and 134 were down-regulated; and the ropivacaine group 4 had 68 differentially expressed genes, of which 46 were up-regulated and 22 were down-regulated. GO enrichment analysis and KEGG signaling pathway analysis showed that most of these differentially expressed genes were related to signaling pathways of inflammatory response. CONCLUSIONS After intrathecal injection of 0.5% ropivacaine and 1.0% ropivacaine for 24 h, the differentially expressed genes in L₃ spinal cord of rats are mainly related to signaling pathways of inflammatory response.
Animals ; Genomics ; Injections, Spinal ; Male ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Ropivacaine ; Spinal Cord/metabolism*

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether xenon post-conditioning affects mTOR signaling as well as endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS)-apoptosis pathway in rats with spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury. METHODS: Fifty male rats were randomized equally into sham-operated group (Sham group), I/R model group (I/R group), I/R model+ xenon post-conditioning group (Xe group), I/R model+rapamycin (a mTOR signaling pathway inhibitor) treatment group (I/R+ Rapa group), and I/R model + xenon post- conditioning with rapamycin treatment group (Xe + Rapa group).. In the latter 4 groups, SCIRI was induced by clamping the abdominal aorta for 85 min followed by reperfusion for 4 h. Rapamycin (or vehicle) was administered by daily intraperitoneal injection (4 mg/kg) for 3 days before SCIRI, and xenon post-conditioning by inhalation of 1∶1 mixture of xenon and oxygen for 1 h at 1 h after initiation of reperfusion; the rats without xenon post-conditioning were given inhalation of nitrogen and oxygen (1∶ 1). After the reperfusion, motor function and histopathologic changes in the rats were examined. Western blotting and real-time PCR were used to detect the protein and mRNA expressions of GRP78, ATF6, IRE1α, PERK, mTOR, p-mTOR, Bax, Bcl-2 and caspase-3 in the spinal cord. RESULTS: The rats showed significantly lowered hind limb motor function following SCIRI (P < 0.01) with a decreased count of normal neurons, increased mRNA and protein expressions of GRP78, ATF6, IRE1α, PERK, and caspase-3, and elevated p-mTOR/mTOR ratio and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio (P < 0.01). Xenon post-conditioning significantly decreased the mRNA and protein levels of GRP78, ATF6, IRE1α, PERK and caspase-3 (P < 0.05 or 0.01) and reduced p-mTOR/mTOR and Bax/Bcl-2 ratios (P < 0.01) in rats with SCIRI; the mRNA contents and protein levels of GRP78 and ATF6 were significantly decreased in I/R+Rapa group (P < 0.01). Compared with those in Xe group, the rats in I/R+Rapa group and Xe+Rapa had significantly lowered BBB and Tarlov scores of the hind legs (P < 0.01), and caspase-3 protein level and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio were significantly lowered in Xe+Rapa group (P < 0.05 or 0.01). CONCLUSION By inhibiting ERS and neuronal apoptosis, xenon post- conditioning may have protective effects against SCIRI in rats. The mTOR signaling pathway is partially involved in this process.
Animals ; Apoptosis ; Caspase 3/metabolism* ; Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress ; Endoribonucleases/pharmacology* ; Injections, Intraperitoneal ; Male ; Neurons/pathology* ; Nitrogen/metabolism* ; Oxygen/metabolism* ; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/metabolism* ; RNA, Messenger/metabolism* ; Random Allocation ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reperfusion Injury/metabolism* ; Sirolimus/pharmacology* ; Spinal Cord Ischemia/pathology* ; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism* ; Xenon/therapeutic use* ; bcl-2-Associated X Protein/metabolism*

Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the cardio-pulmonary function of pregnant women, the anesthetic management and protection of medical staff in the cesarean section is significantly different from that in ordinary surgical operation. This paper reports a case of cesarean section for a woman with COVID-19, which was successfully performed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine on February 8, 2020. Anesthetic management, protection of medical staff and psychological intervention for the pregnant woman during the operation were discussed. Importance has been attached to the preoperative evaluation of pregnant women with COVID-19 and the implementation of anesthesia plan. For moderate patients, intraspinal anesthesia is preferred in cesarean section, and try to reduce its influence in respiration and circulation in both maternal and infant; general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation should be adopted for severe or critically ill patients. Ensure the safety of medical environment, and anesthetists should carry out level-Ⅲ standard protection. Special attention and support should be paid to maternal psychology: fully explanation before operation to reduce anxiety; relieve the discomfort during operation, so as to reduce tension; avoid the bad mood due to pain after operation.
Anesthesia ; Betacoronavirus ; isolation & purification ; Cesarean Section ; methods ; Coronavirus Infections ; complications ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Injections, Spinal ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral ; complications ; Pregnancy

Since the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the cardio-pulmonary function of pregnant women, the anesthetic management in the cesarean section for the patients, as well as the protection for medical staff is significantly different from that in ordinary surgical operation. This paper reports a pregnant woman with COVID-19, for whom a cesarean section was successfully performed in our hospital on February 8, 2020. Anesthetic management, protection of medical staff and psychological intervention for the patients during the operation are discussed. Importance should be attached to the preoperative evaluation of pregnant women with COVID-19 and the implementation of anesthesia plan. For ordinary COVID-19 patients intraspinal anesthesia is preferred in cesarean section, and the influence on respiration and circulation in both maternal and infant should be reduced; while for severe or critically ill patients general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation should be adopted. The safety of medical environment should be ensured, and level-Ⅲ standard protection should be taken for anesthetists. Special attention and support should be given to maternal psychology. It is important to give full explanation before operation to reduce anxiety; to relieve the discomfort during operation to reduce tension; to avoid the bad mood of patients due to pain after operation.
Anesthesia ; Betacoronavirus ; Cesarean Section ; Coronavirus Infections ; complications ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Injections, Spinal ; Pneumonia, Viral ; complications ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious ; surgery ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Preoperative Care

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that sequential intrathecal injection of fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean section (CS) anesthesia provides a superior anesthetic effect than use of bupivacaine alone, and prolongs postoperative analgesia. Herein, we investigated whether rapid intrathecal injection of fentanyl followed by slow injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine affects the duration of postoperative analgesia, the effectiveness of anesthesia, and hemodynamic status. METHODS: Fifty-six parturients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, aged 18–40 years, and scheduled to undergo elective CS were randomly assigned to 2 groups of 28 patients each. The normal sequential group received sequential intrathecal injections of fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine at the same rate, each with a 5 ml syringe. The rapid sequential group received a rapid intrathecal injection of fentanyl with an insulin syringe, followed by a slow injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine with a 5 ml syringe. The onset of sensory block, the timing of the first rescue analgesia, the doses of rescue analgesics, the degree of postoperative pain, the onset and duration of motor block, the incidence and duration of hypotension, and spinal anesthesia-related complications were recorded. RESULTS: While both approaches had comparable spinal anesthesia-related complications, incidence and duration of hypotension, and doses of ephedrine, the rapid sequential group exhibited a more rapid onset of sensory block, a higher sensory level, and more prolonged postoperative analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid sequential injection of fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine produced superior anesthesia and more prolonged postoperative analgesia than sequential injections of both at the same rate.
Analgesia ; Analgesics ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Spinal ; Anesthetics ; Bupivacaine ; Cesarean Section ; Ephedrine ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypotension ; Incidence ; Injections, Spinal ; Insulin ; Pain, Postoperative ; Pregnancy ; Syringes

The approach we suggest was developed for cases in which the fourth and fifth lumbar and first sacral spinal nerves were affected in lumbar degenerative disc disease. Retrodiscal transforaminal epidural injection is known to be very effective for lumbar radiculopathy because of excellent access to primary pathology; however, access below L5 is often restricted by the anatomic characteristics of the L5–S1. In the translateral recess approach (TLR), proper final needle placement (i.e., in the axillary portion between the exiting and traversing nerve roots) can be achieved by setting the direction of the needle laterally and superiorly from the distal tip of the infra-adjacent spinous process toward the medial wall of the pedicle and neural foramen of the given level without neural injury. This approach is possible because of the wide interlaminar space in the L5–S1. Preganglionic epidural injection through TLR is an effective and safe spinal intervention for lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Injections, Epidural ; Needles ; Pathology ; Radiculopathy ; Spinal Nerves

STUDY DESIGN: Review article.OBJECTIVES: To assess the evidence for nonoperative treatment of various degenerative spinal degenerative diseases.SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: No study has yet evaluated the evidence for preoperative nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal diseases.METHODS: The evidence regarding nonoperative treatment for each disease was reviewed through NASS guidelines, and the treatment effect compared to surgical treatment was reviewed through the SPORT series. The efficacy of nonoperative treatment according to disease severity and certain special conditions was investigated through corresponding individual articles.RESULTS: No kind of nonoperative treatment could change the fundamental progression of degenerative spinal disease. The natural course of lumbar disc herniation is favorable regardless of treatment. More than 70% of routine cases improve within 6 weeks. However, it does not take a full 6 weeks to decide whether to perform surgery or not. The evidence for transforaminal epidural steroid injections for short-term pain control is grade A. There is grade B evidence for nonoperative treatment with the goal of mid- to long-term pain control. However, we cannot say that those outcomes are better than the natural course of the disease itself. In cases of radicular weakness, the degree of weakness is correlated with the final outcomes, but it is not evident whether the duration of weakness is correlated with surgical outcomes. Early surgery is usually necessary due to intolerable pain, rather than stable motor weakness. The social cost of herniated discs arises from the loss of patients’ productivity, rather than from direct medical expenses. The natural course of spinal stenosis involves provoked pain and the need for palliative care. Unlike disc herniation, rapid deterioration and marked improvement do not occur. The symptoms of mild to moderate lumbar stenosis are unchanged in 70% of cases, improve in 15%, and worsen in 15%. No study has compared nonoperative treatment with the natural course of the disease. There is no evidence for nonoperative treatment of severe stenosis. Epidural spinal injections are effective for controlling short-term pain. Spontaneous recovery of radicular weakness does not occur, and urgent surgery is necessary in such cases. There is no evidence regarding the natural course and nonoperative treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. The working group consensus recommends that it should follow the pattern of nonoperative treatment of spinal stenosis when radicular stenosis symptoms are predominant. Overall, 40%–66% of cases of adult bilateral isthmic spondylolysis progress to symptomatic spondylolisthesis. No studies have investigated nonoperative treatment except physical exercise.CONCLUSIONS: Although short-term symptom amelioration can be achieved by nonoperative treatment, the fundamental progression of the disease is not affected. For conditions excluded from most studies, such as prior spine surgery, cauda equina syndrome, progressive neurological deficit, and uncontrollable severe pain associated with instability, deformity, or vertebral fractures, there were not enough studies to reach informed conclusions. Our review found no evidence regarding nonoperative treatment for such conditions. Furthermore, the treatment methods for each disease are not clearly distinguished from each other, and the techniques used for disc herniation have been applied to other diseases without any evidence.
Adult ; Congenital Abnormalities ; Consensus ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Efficiency ; Exercise ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; Palliative Care ; Polyradiculopathy ; Spinal Diseases ; Spinal Stenosis ; Spine ; Spondylolisthesis ; Spondylolysis ; Sports

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the feasibility of ultrasound-guided lumbar nerve root block (LNRB) and S1 nerve root block by identifying spread patterns via fluoroscopy in cadavers.METHOD: A total of 48 ultrasound-guided injections were performed in 4 fresh cadavers from L1 to S1 roots. The target point of LNRB was the midpoint between the lower border of the transverse process and the facet joint at each level. The target point of S1 nerve root block was the S1 foramen, which can be visualized between the median sacral crest and the posterior superior iliac spine, below the L5-S1 facet joint. The injection was performed via an in-plane approach under real-time axial view ultrasound guidance. Fluoroscopic validation was performed after the injection of 2 cc of contrast agent.RESULTS: The needle placements were correct in all injections. Fluoroscopy confirmed an intra-foraminal contrast spreading pattern following 41 of the 48 injections (85.4%). The other 7 injections (14.6%) yielded typical neurograms, but also resulted in extra-foraminal patterns that occurred evenly in each nerve root, including S1.CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided injection may be an option for the delivery of injectate into the S1 nerve root, as well as lumbar nerve root area.
Cadaver ; Fluoroscopy ; Injections, Spinal ; Lumbosacral Region ; Methods ; Needles ; Spinal Nerve Roots ; Spine ; Ultrasonography ; Zygapophyseal Joint

To explore whether Wnt3a exerts a role in neuropathic pain through Jumonji C domain 6 (JMJD6)-associated epigenetic modification. 
 Methods: SD rats were divided into 4 groups: A sham group, a chronic constriction injury (CCI) group, a CCI+negative lentiviral expression vector (LV-NC) group and a CCI+lentiviral overexpression vector (LV-JMJD6) group. The sciatic nerve CCI model of SD rat and JMJD6 lentiviral expression vector were constructed. On the third day after CCI, the intrathecal catheter was prepared, and 20 μL of normal saline and lentivirus-containing reagent (virus titer 1×108 TU/mL) were administered. The rats' paw withdrawal mechanical threshold (PWMT) and paw withdrawal thermal latency (PWTL) were monitored, and Western blotting was used to detect the expression of Wnt3a and NR2B protein in the spinal cord. Co-immunoprecipitation was applied to detect the interaction between JMJD6 and Wnt3a.
 Results: Compared with the sham group, the PWMT of the rats in each group after CCI was significantly decreased and the PWTL was significantly shortened (P<0.05). Compared with the CCI group and the CCI+LV-NC group, PWMT in the CCI+LV-JMJD6 group was increased significantly on the 10th day and the 14th day after CCI, and the PWTL was significantly prolonged on the 14th day after CCI (P<0.05). On the 14th day after CCI, the expression levels of Wnt3a and NR2B in the CCI group and the CCI+LV-NC group were significantly higher than those in the sham group. After intrathecal injection of lentiviral vector, Wnt3a and NR2B protein expression levels in the CCI+LV-JMJD6 group were lower compared with the CCI+LV-NC group (P<0.05). The results of co-immunoprecipitation showed no direct interaction between Wnt3a and JMJD6.
 Conclusion: Wnt3a is involved in mediating neuropathic pain, and its effect may be related to the epigenetic modification of JMJD6, which is likely regulated through indirect interaction.
Animals ; Injections, Spinal ; Neuralgia ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Signal Transduction ; Spinal Cord ; Wnt3A Protein

BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injection (TFEI) is an effective treatment for spinal disease. However, TFEI may have several types of complications, some of which can be attributed to intravascular injection. We reviewed studies to compare the intravascular injection rate among different needle types. METHODS: We searched the literature for articles on the intravascular injection rate among different needle types used in TFEI. The search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. RESULTS: A total of six studies comprising 2359 patients were identified. Compared with the Quincke needle, the Whitacre needle reduced the intravascular injection rate (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = [0.44–0.73], P < 0.001). However, compared with the Quincke needle, the Chiba needle did not reduce the intravascular injection rate (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = [0.44–1.45], P = 0.46). In one study, the intravascular injection rate using a blunt-tip needle was lower than that using a sharp needle. In another study, the Whitacre and the blunt-tip needle have similar intravascular injection rates, while, the catheter-extension needle showed a reduced intravascular injection rate. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that the Whitacre needle reduced the intravascular injection rate as compared with the Quincke needle, but failed to establish that the Chiba needle can decrease the intravascular injection rate in TFEI. Moreover, the blunt-tip needle can reduce the intravascular injection rate compared with the Quincke needle, and the catheter-extension needle can reduce the intravascular injection rate compared with the Whitacre and the blunt-tip needle.
Anesthesia, Epidural ; Humans ; Injections, Epidural ; Needles ; Spinal Diseases