OBJECTIVE: To explore the genetic etiology for a pregnant woman with a history of multiple adverse pregnancies and assess the phenotype-genotype correlation of 22q11.2 microduplication syndrome in her family. METHODS: Amniotic fluid sample was taken from a pregnant woman for whom non-invasive prenatal screening indicated chromosome 22 abnormalities in the fetus. Peripheral blood samples from the woman, her brother and parents were collected for high-throughput low-depth whole genome sequencing (CNV-seq). A pedigree traceability analysis of the results was conducted in conjunction with analysis of clinical manifestation. Relevant literature (from establishment to March 2025) was systematically searched. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Mianyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital (Ethics No.: Lun Shen [2024]009). RESULTS: CNV-seq revealed that the fetus had harbored a 6.02 Mb duplication at 22q11.21q11.23. Karyotyping confirmed it as 46,X?dup(22)(q11.2). Pedigree verification demonstrated that the pregnant woman, her brother and mother had all carried the same duplication. Phenotypic analysis of the affected family members showed classic features of 22q11.2 microduplication syndrome, including hypernasal speech, low nasal bridge, congenital heart disease, and cognitive impairment. A total of 44 cases with full information (including three patients from this pedigree) were included in the analysis. The penetrance of 22q11.2 duplication was approximately 29.5% (13/44), and 52.3% (23/44) of the cases had inherited the variant from a phenotypically normal parent. CONCLUSION This study has identified the genetic basis for the woman's recurrent adverse pregnancies and phenotypic abnormalities in her family members. The scoliosis identified in her younger brother has not been previously reported, thereby may enrich the clinical phenotype of this syndrome. For fetuses identified with a 22q11.2 microduplication, detailed fetal imaging is recommended, and genetic counseling should be provided to the couples.
Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis/methods* ; Chromosome Duplication/genetics* ; Male ; Pedigree ; DiGeorge Syndrome/diagnosis* ; Adult ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22/genetics* ; Abnormalities, Multiple

OBJECTIVE: To explore the genetic characteristics of a Chinese pedigree with rare mosaic 11q partial duplication and its pathogenetic mechanisms. METHODS: A pedigree which underwent prenatal diagnosis at Wenzhou Central Hospital between September 25, 2015 and November 30, 2023 was selected for the study. Clinical data were collected from the pedigree. Peripheral blood samples from the parents, amniotic fluid from the fetus, and peripheral blood sample from the neonate were obtained. Genetic testing was carried out by using G-banded chromosomal karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) technology. Relevant literature was searched in the CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and PubMed databases to summarize the clinical phenotypes of patients with 11q partial duplication. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Wenzhou Central Hospital (Ethics No. L2024-07-080). RESULTS: The pregnant woman (G₃) had a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes. During her first pregnancy (G₁), prenatal ultrasound indicated intrauterine growth restriction and a Dandy-Walker variant. Follow-up at 8 years of age showed developmental delays and mild intellectual disability. During her second pregnancy (G₂), prenatal ultrasound revealed nasal bone hypoplasia, and the pregnancy was terminated at 23rd gestational week. During her third pregnancy (G₃), all prenatal tests were normal, and the neonate showed normal growth and development at 4 months of age. The karyotype of amniotic fluid of her first pregnancy was 46,X?, and the SNP-array analysis of neonatal peripheral blood showed arr[GRCh37/hg19]11q13.4q25(70432450_134607121)×2~3, with a mosaicism rate being approximately 40%. The karyotype for her second pregnancy was 46,X?,rec(11)dup(11q)inv(11)(p15q13)dmat[6]/46,X?[27], and the SNP-array result was arr[GRCh38]11q13.4q25(71406636_135067522)×2~3, with a mosaicism rate being approximately 75%. The karyotype for her third pregnancy was 46,X?,inv(11)(p15q13)mat, and the SNP-array result was arr(XN)×1,(1~22)×2. The karyotype of the woman was 46,XX,inv(11)(p15q13), and that of her husband was 46,XY. A review of 12 similar cases (including G₁) from the literature revealed that the common clinical phenotypes of 11q partial duplication included intellectual disability (12/12), developmental delay (12/12), ear abnormalities (12/12), microcephaly (10/12), seizures (8/12), hypotonia (8/12), and congenital heart malformations (7/12). CONCLUSION Mosaic partial duplication of 11q may underlie the genetic etiology of this pedigree. The pregnant woman is a carrier of an inversion on chromosome 11, which might have formed the mosaic 11q partial duplication through meiotic errors and mitotic trisomy rescue mechanisms during reproduction.
Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pregnancy ; China ; Chromosome Duplication ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics* ; East Asian People/genetics* ; Karyotyping ; Mosaicism ; Pedigree ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Prenatal Diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the results of prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy of fetuses with a high risk for 6p22.1.1-p21.32 duplication signaled by non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). METHODS: Clinical information, results of prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy for fetuses with a high risk for 6p22.1-p21.32 duplication were collected and analyzed. This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Ethic No. 2018-YB-08). RESULTS: Forty three pregnant women with a high risk for 6p22.1-p21.32 duplication were identified by NIPS, among whom 30 had accepted invasive prenatal diagnosis, and 27 fetuses were verified to be false positive. Three fetuses were found to have other chromosomal abnormalities, among whom two were rated to be likely benign CNV and 1 was rated to be likely pathogenic. Follow up of the 43 pregnant women revealed that 35 fetuses were normal after birth, 1 pregnancy was terminated, and 7 were lost to follow up. CONCLUSION For pregnant women with a high risk for 6p22.1-p21.32 duplication signaled by NIPS, genetic counselor need to inform them the high false positive rate and recommend invasive prenatal diagnosis and/or ultrasound examination in order to reduce the psychological and economic burdens.
Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Chromosome Duplication ; Adult ; Prenatal Diagnosis/methods* ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6/genetics* ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/methods* ; Chromosome Disorders/genetics* ; Fetus/abnormalities*

OBJECTIVE: To report on the phenotype of an adult patient with 2p23.2p22.1 duplication and explore its genotype-phenotype correlation. METHODS: A pregnant woman who had presented at the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School on January 12, 2024 for a high risk signaled by NIPT was selected as the study subject. Amniotic fluid and peripheral blood samples were collected and subjected to chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). The phenotype of the patient was observed, the medical history was taken, combined with the result of CMA assay, relevant database was searched for similar cases reported in the literature, and the correlation between genotype and phenotype was analyzed. RESULTS: The CMA result of the patient was arr[GRCh38]2p23.2p22.1(27961669_39280633)×3, which indicated a 11.31 Mb duplication. The woman was found to have short stature, learning disability, visual deficit, sleep disorder and other disorders. CONCLUSION The duplication of PPP1CB and SOS1 genes within the 2p23.2p22.1 region can result in Noonan syndrome-like clinical manifestations such as short stature and reduced visual acuity. The duplication of the PPP1CB gene may be associated with the abnormal visual phenotype.
Humans ; Female ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2/genetics* ; Adult ; Pregnancy ; Chromosome Duplication ; Phenotype

Humans ; Chromosome Deletion ; Chromosome Duplication

OBJECTIVE: To explore the genetic basis for a Chinese pedigree with 6q26q27 microduplication and 15q26.3 microdeletion. METHODS: A fetus with a 6q26q27 microduplication and a 15q26.3 microdeletion diagnosed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University in January 2021 and members of its pedigree were selected as the study subject. Clinical data of the fetus was collected. The fetus and its parents were analyzed by G-banding karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and its maternal grandparents were also subjected to G-banding karyotype analysis. RESULTS: Prenatal ultrasound had indicated intrauterine growth retardation of the fetus, though no karyotypic abnormality was found with the amniotic fluid sample and blood samples from its pedigree members. CMA revealed that the fetus has carried a 6.6 Mb microduplication in 6q26q27 and a 1.9 Mb microdeletion in 15q26.3, and his mother also carried a 6.49 duplication and a 1.867 deletion in the same region. No anomaly was found with its father. CONCLUSION The 6q26q27 microduplication and 15q26.3 microdeletion probably underlay the intrauterine growth retardation in this fetus.
Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; East Asian People ; Fetal Growth Retardation/genetics* ; Karyotype ; Pedigree ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Sequence Deletion ; Chromosome Duplication

After the promulgation of the first edition of expert consensus on the application of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) technology in prenatal diagnosis in 2014, after 8 years of clinical and technical development, CMA technology has become a first-line diagnosis technology for fetal chromosome copy number deletion or duplication abnormalities, and is widely used in the field of prenatal diagnosis in China. However, with the development of the industry and the accumulation of experience in case diagnosis, the application of CMA technology in many important aspects of prenatal diagnosis, such as clinical diagnosis testimony, data analysis and genetic counseling before and after testing, needs to be further standardized and improved, so as to make the application of CMA technology more in line with clinical needs. The revision of the guideline was led by the National Prenatal Diagnostic Technical Expert Group, and several prenatal diagnostic institutions such as Peking Union Medical College Hospital were commissioned to write, discuss and revise the first draft, which was discussed and reviewed by all the experts of the National Prenatal Diagnostic Technical Expert Group, and was finally formed after extensive review and revision. This guideline is aimed at the important aspects of the application of CMA technology in prenatal diagnosis and clinical diagnosis, from the clinical application of evidence, test quality control, data analysis and interpretation, diagnosis report writing, genetic counseling before and after testing and other work specifications are elaborated and introduced in detail. It fully reflects the integrated experience, professional thinking and guidance of the current Chinese expert team on the prenatal diagnosis application of CMA technology. The compilation of the guideline for the application of CMA technology in prenatal diagnosis will strive to promote the standardization and advancement of prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome diseases in China.
Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Asian People ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Chromosome Deletion ; Chromosome Duplication/genetics* ; DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics* ; Fetal Diseases/genetics* ; Genetic Counseling ; Microarray Analysis ; Prenatal Care ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Practice Guidelines as Topic

OBJECTIVE: To carry out genetic analysis for a Chinese pedigree affected with intellectual disability and overgrowth due to a supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC). METHODS: A pedigree which had presented at Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital on August 31, 2021 was selected as the study subject, for which chromosomal karyotyping, single nucleotide polymorphism-based microarray (SNP-array), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were carried out in combination. RESULTS: SNP-array analysis showed that the proband and his sister had both harbored a 16.1 Mb duplication which encompassed the critical region of 15q26 overgrowth syndrome. FISH confirmed that the proband was 47,XX,+neo(15)(qter→q25.3:)mat, her mother was 47,XX,del(15)(q25.3:),+neo(15)(qter→q25.3:), whilst her father was normal. CONCLUSION Application of multiple genetic techniques has facilitated delineation of the origin of sSMC and reliable genetic counseling for this pedigree.
Female ; Humans ; Chromosomes ; East Asian People ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Karyotyping ; Pedigree ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Intellectual Disability/genetics* ; Chromosome Duplication/genetics* ; Male

OBJECTIVE: To explore the genetic basis for an infant with multiple malformations including congenital heart disease and cleft palate. METHODS: The child and his parents were subjected to conventional chromosomal karyotyping and low-coverage massively parallel copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) analysis. RESULTS: The infant was found to have a 46,X,add(Y)(q11.23) karyotype, and his CNV-seq result was seq [hg19] 22q12.1q13.3 (29 520 001-51 180 000)× 3. His parents were found to be normal by both methods. CONCLUSION The additional chromosomal material found on Yq, verified as duplication of 22q12.1-q13.3, may account for the abnormal phenotype in this infant. CNV-seq has provided a useful complement for the diagnosis and more accurate information for genetic counseling.
Abnormalities, Multiple ; genetics ; Child ; Chromosome Duplication ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22 ; genetics ; Cleft Palate ; genetics ; DNA Copy Number Variations ; Genetic Testing ; Heart Defects, Congenital ; genetics ; Humans ; Infant ; Karyotyping

OBJECTIVE: To explore the genetic basis for a Chinese pedigree affected with split hand/foot malformation (SHFM). METHODS: Genomic DNA of the proband and other affected members was extracted from peripheral blood samples. Chromosomal microarray analysis was employed to detect genome-wide copy number variations (CNVs). RESULTS: A 400 kb microduplication was identified in the 10q24.31-q24.32 region among all affected individuals. The microduplication has involved four genes, namely LBX1, BTRC, POLL and DPCD, in addition with part of FBXW4 gene. CONCLUSION The 10q24.31-q24.32 microduplication has segregated with the disease phenotype in this pedigree and probably underlay the SHFM malformation in the patients.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Chromosome Duplication ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 10 ; genetics ; DNA Copy Number Variations ; Foot Deformities, Congenital ; genetics ; Genetic Testing ; Hand Deformities, Congenital ; genetics ; Humans ; Limb Deformities, Congenital ; genetics ; Pedigree