Chinese Medical Journal.2001;114(9):986-987.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the advantages and disadvantages of two procedures: Roux-Y with enterostomy and Roux-Y with spur valve in the treatment of biliary atresia. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with biliary atresia underwent hepatic portoenterostomy with percutaneous jejunal enterostomy (Group A) and 24 patients underwent Roux-Y with antireflux spur valve (Group B). Clinical data were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Ten patients remained alive in the Group A. Among them, 9 survived without jaundice, the oldest one being 9-years old. One of the 9 patients had portal hypertension. The remaining one who survived with jaundice and portal hypertension was 8-years old at follow up. Ten patients in the Group B remained alive. Of them, 8 survived without jaundice and 2 with jaundice. CONCLUSIONS: Two surgical procedures had similar effects in preventing reflux cholangitis, while spur valve has the benefit of quitting cutaneous enterostomy.
备案号: 11010502037788, 京ICP备10218182号-8)