Korean Journal of Nephrology.2011;30(1):61-66.
PURPOSE: Systemic anticoagulation, usually with heparin, is required to prevent thrombosis in the blood circuit of hemodialysis. In patients at high bleeding risk, strategies to minimize the bleeding risk include heparin-free or regional anticoagulation methods. Nafamostat mesilate with conventional dose (35 mg/hr) has been used for this purpose. But it is an expensive anticoagulant to use conveniently for the dialysis therapy. Application of low-dose nafamostat mesilate has almost never been tried yet on hemodiaysis management. In this study, we examined the effect of low-dose nafamostat mesilate compared to heparin-free in hemodialysis patients with high risk of bleeding. METHODS: The current study was conducted on 35 hemodialysis patients with high bleeding risk (on-going bleeding, hemorrhage, surgery or severe thrombocytopenia). In the low-dose nafamostat group (n=17, mean age: 59+/-15 years), 238 sessions were performed with continuous infusion of nafamostat mesilate (12.5 mg/hr). In the control group with saline-flushing no heparin methods (n=18, mean age: 57+/-17 years), 247 sessions were analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the low-dose nafamostat group and the saline group. In the progress of bleeding complications, there were no significant differences between the two groups (11.8% vs. 11.1%). In saline group, however, massive clotting occurred in 44.5 per 1000 sessions, while it occurred in 4.2 per 1000 sessions in the low-dose nafamostat group (p=0.006). CONCLUSION: In patients at high bleeding risk, low-dose nafamostat mesilat can be used as an inexpensive, effective, and safe anticoagulant for hemodialysis.
Dialysis
;
Guanidines
;
Hemorrhage
;
Heparin
;
Humans
;
Mesylates
;
Renal Dialysis
;
Thrombosis