Korean Journal of Medical Education.2017;29(1):41-43. doi:10.3946/kjme.2017.52
Korean Journal of Medical Education
1989 (1, 1) to 2008 (20, 4) ISSN: 1225-8067
Sort by
DISPLAY OPTIONS
Format:
Per page:
Medical students' and patients' perceptions of patient-centred attitude.
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2017;29(1):33-39. doi:10.3946/kjme.2017.51
PURPOSE: Patient-centred care can increase patient satisfaction and lead to better clinical outcomes for them, such as improved physical status and higher health-related quality of life. However, doctors' and patients' views on patient-centred attitude might differ and could be affected by culture and the community environment. To clarify the differences in primary care patients' and senior medical students' perceptions of medical students' patient-centred attitude. METHODS: A total of 1,025 subjects-827 patients from primary care institutions and 198 fourth-year medical students from a medical college in South Korea-completed the Patient Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS). The students completed the self-reported questionnaire at the end of their clinical clerkship. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and one-way analysis of variances were conducted in SPSS version 21.0. RESULTS: Firstly, sharing subscale scores were higher among patients than among medical students (students, 3.61 vs. patients, 3.76; p<0.001), but secondly, caring subscale scores were higher among medical students (students, 4.18 vs. patients, 3.82; p<0.001). Thirdly, PPOS total scores were higher among medical students (students, 3.90 vs. patients, 3.79; p=0.001). Finally, male students had the lowest sharing scores (F=6.811, p<0.001) and female students showed the highest PPOS total scores (F=5.805, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Significant differences between medical students' and patients' perceptions of medical students' patient-centred attitudes suggest the necessity of educational efforts to overcome the gap between the groups.
Clinical Clerkship ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Patient Satisfaction ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Primary Health Care ; Quality of Life ; Students, Medical
Clinical Clerkship ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Patient Satisfaction ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Primary Health Care ; Quality of Life ; Students, Medical
Digital lectures for learning gross anatomy: a study of their efficacy.
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2017;29(1):27-32. doi:10.3946/kjme.2017.50
PURPOSE: The current study investigates the level of students' learning and attitudes towards the teaching and learning process when using digital lectures to teach gross anatomy to year 1 medical students. METHODS: The study sampled year 1 medical students of cohorts 2013 and 2014. The year 1 medical students in 2013 were taught gross anatomy of the heart by didactic classroom lectures while those in 2014 were taught with digital lectures using the same content. A review session was conducted for the 2014 cohort. A 19-item survey was distributed amongst students to investigate their attitudes and feedback. The data were analysed using SPSS software. RESULTS: The 2014 cohort had a mean score of 47.65 for short essay questions and 51.19 for multiple choice questions, while the 2013 cohort scored an average of 36.80 for short essay questions and 49.22 for multiple choice questions. The difference in scores for each type of question was found to be significant. Using a 5-point Likert scale, students gave an average of 4.11 when asked if they liked the teaching and learning process and would like it to be applied further. CONCLUSION: The results of the study provide strong evidence that the digital teaching and learning process was well received by students and could also lead to improved performance. Digital lectures can provide a satisfactory substitute for classroom lectures to teach gross anatomy, thus providing flexibility in learning and efficient learning, whilst also freeing lecture slots to promote mastery learning.
Cohort Studies ; Heart ; Humans ; Learning* ; Lectures* ; Pliability ; Students, Medical
Cohort Studies ; Heart ; Humans ; Learning* ; Lectures* ; Pliability ; Students, Medical
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2005;17(2):197-203.
PURPOSE: Standardized patients participate in clinical performance examinations not only to simulate case scenarios but also to evaluate the performance of students using a checklist. The accuracy in checking off checklist items is one of the most important factors determining the reliability of this examination. The purposes of this study were to determine the SP' s overall accuracy in recording checklist items, and whether their accuracy was affected by certain characteristics of checklist items. METHODS: Three professors, who have been fully involved in scenario development and SP training, reviewed videotapes of the examination and evaluated the performance of the students using the same checklist. SP' s checklists were marked on this 'correct checklist'. The checklists and checklist guidelines of the items marked under the score of 50 out of 100 were analyzed. RESULTS: Results showed that the accuracy of the SP' s in recording checklist items was 86.9% and was affected by certain characteristics, such as complexity or ambiguity of checklists and checklist guidelines. CONCLUSION: In this study, the SP' s accuracy in recording checklist items was good to very good, and the result suggested that the accuracy could be improved by the elaboration of checklists and checklist guidelines.
Checklist* ; Educational Measurement ; Humans ; Observer Variation ; Videotape Recording
Checklist* ; Educational Measurement ; Humans ; Observer Variation ; Videotape Recording
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2005;17(2):185-196.
PURPOSE: During the high-stake examinations such as OSCE (Objective structured clinical examination) or CPX (clinical performance exam), test security is generally accepted as a major concern for test validity. This study was conducted to investigate the effect on examinee' s scores of repeated, serial administrations of essentially the same standardized patient (SP) -based performance exam. METHODS: A performance-based examination using eight SP cases was administered to 123 senior medical students at Hanyang University School of Medicine. Students were randomly assigned to one of 16 groups of 8 students each. Three groups were tested serially each day, requiring 5 days for the complete administration of the examination. We compared the mean scores of the five groups of the examinees tested on different days with ANOVA and linear trends with multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: For both checklist scores and written scores during the interstation work, the mean scores of the first day groups were significantly lower compared to subsequent groups. And, there were slight linear trends in the scores over the five days. Scores related to case-specific history taking, information sharing, and clinical courtesy were significantly affected by the sharing of information between students. Scores related to patient satisfaction, physical exam, and physician-patient interaction were not influenced by the same pattern of behaviour. CONCLUSION: Test security may be violated during SP-based performance exams even though the checklists are not accessible to the examinees. It would be desirable for the test-givers to prepare alternative forms of cases for maintaining the validity of SP-based performance exams.
Checklist ; Clinical Competence ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Patient Satisfaction ; Students, Medical
Checklist ; Clinical Competence ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Patient Satisfaction ; Students, Medical
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2005;17(2):173-184.
PURPOSE: To compare the evaluation results of faculties to those of Standardized Patients (SP) participating in a Clinical Performance Examination (CPX) administered at Ewha Womans University College of Medicine. METHODS: The CPX was taken by 77 fourth year medical students. Cases and checklist were developed by the medical school consortium in capital area. Six cases were used and 24 SPs participated and evaluated the students' performances. The whole session was recorded on videotapes so that 6 medical school faculties could analyze and evaluate the students' performances as well. The results were compared and analyzed by SPSS package. RESULTS: The agreement between the faculties and the SPs was relatively good (r=0.79), but not good enough. In every case, SPs gave higher marks than did the faculties. Clear disease entity cases like "hepatitis" and "anemia" showed better agreement than obscure clinical contexts such as "bad news delivery". Better agreement was seen in the items of physical exam category (r=0.91), but the agreement was very poor in the items of doctor-patient (Dr-Pt) relationship category (r=0.54). The construction of checklist and the character of each evaluation item should influence the differences. CONCLUSION: More detailed guidelines and clear/specific evaluating items are necessary to improve the agreement rate. In certain categories like physical exam and brief history taking, the SP' s evaluation can replace the faculties', but for complex contexts like Dr-Pt relationship.
Checklist ; Female ; Humans ; Schools, Medical ; Students, Medical ; Videotape Recording
Checklist ; Female ; Humans ; Schools, Medical ; Students, Medical ; Videotape Recording
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2005;17(2):163-172.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to analyse the appropriateness of using standardized patients' (SPs) assessment scores of medical students in clinical performance examination (CPX). METHODS: 110 fourth year medical students in year four were divided into two large groups (group A and group B). Each group of students performed four different cases and overall, eight cases were tested. The examination were done by professors and the SPs using the same examination paper. Test scores were analysed per station and per each test domain. The differences between the two examiners were studied using paired t-test. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the scores given out by the professors' and the SP' s in four out of the eight stations. According to the examination results of each domain, four cases showed significant differences in the history taking category, three cases in the physical examination, one case in the information sharing, four cases in clinical courtesy, and two cases in physician-patient relationship category. Cronbach' s alpha scores of all stations were over 0.6, reflecting that the test items were appropriate for the examination. CONCLUSION: From the result of this study and according to many preceding studies, using SPs' evaluation scores in CPX is appropriate. Some limitation of this study and ideas for improvement in using SPs in CPX are suggested.
Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Physical Examination ; Students, Medical
Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Physical Examination ; Students, Medical
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2005;17(2):151-162.
PURPOSE: This study aims to abstract the differences of scores between the clinical instructors and standardized patients (SPs) in a clinical performance examination (CPX) using SPs and to correlate the concordance between the evaluation scores and the school records. METHODS: The CPX was administered in 2003 to a total of thirty-six fifth year medical students at Gachon Medical School. The examination consisted of four cases, and four stations were duplicated, each requiring a total of 7.5 minutes per station. Evaluation of the student' s performances was conducted by both clinical instructors and SPs using a formatted checklist. Results were analysed by t-test, agreement rates, and Pearson correlation. RESULT: The mean scores given out by the clinical instructors and the SPs for the newly developed case were significantly different, while those scores for pre-existing cases were not in the old cases. The correlation coefficients between these two evaluation groups were relatively high. And agreements between the two evaluation groups were 0.37~0.72. The mean scores among clinical instructors were not significantly different, but the correlation coefficients and agreement rates were relatively high. The correlation between the evaluation scores and school records did not correlate significantly. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the CPX is a useful tool to measure the students' essential competences in areas of knowledge, skills and attitude during the subinternship stage. In conducting a successful CPX, it is crucial to reconsider the recycling of cases and the selection and training of SPs aside from the development of an objective checklist.
Checklist ; Clinical Competence ; Humans ; Recycling ; Schools, Medical* ; Students, Medical
Checklist ; Clinical Competence ; Humans ; Recycling ; Schools, Medical* ; Students, Medical
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2000;12(1):97-105.
The Korean medical establishment has traditionally shown little concern for formal training in medical ethics; only recently have courses in medical ethics been included in the curricula of Korea's medical schools. The importance and effectiveness of such courses is still a matter of some debate. This study attempted to measure the effects of a course in medical ethics on senior medical students. For this study, a discussion based course was designed, which made considerable use of video-taped ethical situations. Students were requested to answer a series of ethics related questions both before and after taking the course. Prior to taking the course, students indicated that treatment refusal, abortion, sex pre-selection, and euthanasia are the most important ethical issues in contemporary medical practice in Korea. However, after taking the course, students modified this list slightly by replacing the issue of euthanasia with that of equal access to health care resources. No significant changes were observed in students' value systems. The students' response to the course was favorable.
Curriculum ; Ethical Theory ; Ethics ; Ethics, Medical* ; Euthanasia ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Korea ; Schools, Medical ; Students, Medical* ; Treatment Refusal
Curriculum ; Ethical Theory ; Ethics ; Ethics, Medical* ; Euthanasia ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Korea ; Schools, Medical ; Students, Medical* ; Treatment Refusal
A Comparison of Student and Faculty Perspectives on Course Evaluation in a Medical School.
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2008;20(2):163-167.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in perception between the students and faculty on course evaluation by the students and to pursue the improving of the course evaluation system. METHODS: This study targeted 61 faculty and 88 students of the School of Medicine at A University. A questionnaire survey was administered. RESULTS: Both the students and faculty members agreed with the need of a course evaluation system, but there were differences in perception between the two groups in terms of efficiency and factors affecting evaluation results. CONCLUSION: The department in charge of course evaluations of the school of medicine should review the differences in perception between students and faculty and use the reviewed content to improve the present course evaluation system.
Fees and Charges ; Humans ; Schools, Medical ; Surveys and Questionnaires
Fees and Charges ; Humans ; Schools, Medical ; Surveys and Questionnaires
Country
Republic of Korea
Publisher
Korean Society of Medical Education
ElectronicLinks
http://kjme.krEditor-in-chief
Abbreviation
Korean J Med Educ
Vernacular Journal Title
한국의학교육
ISSN
1225-8067
EISSN
Year Approved
2007
Current Indexing Status
Currently Indexed
Start Year
1989
Description
Current Title
Powered by IMICAMS(
备案号: 11010502037788, 京ICP备10218182号-8)