Objective To compare the curative effect of conservative treatment and surgical treatment for bronchiectasis. Methods 60 patients with bronchiectasis were randomly divided into observation group and control group,30 cases in each group,they were treated with surgery and medical therapy respectively,the clinical efficacy,length of stay, costs, remission time of symptoms and signs, changes of blood gas index and ESR, CRP,TNF-α, WBC,NEUT of the two groups after treatment were compared. Results The curative rate of observation group was significandy higher than control group, while the length of stay, remission time of symptoms and signs and hospitalization costs were significantly lower than control group, the difference was statistically significant (all P ＜0.05) ;After treatmenit,the blood gas index of both groups improved significantly than before treatment(all P ＜ 0.05), and the blood gas index of observation group improved significantly than the control group (all P ＜ 0. 05); After treatment, ESR, CRP,TNF-α,WBC and NEUT of both groups were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment(all P ＜0. 05); Between the two groups, the index value of the observation group decreased significantly (all P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Surgical treatment for bronchiectasis was superior to conservative treatment with better curative effect,lower cost, shorter hospital stay and faster relief of symptoms and signs, it had good prospects to be applied.