Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2009;17(8):569-573
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of telbivudine vs. lamivudine in treating the patients with HBeAg-positive and negative chronic hepatitis B.
Wen CHEN 1 ; Jin-Lin HOU
Affiliations
Country
China
Language
Chinese
MeSH
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
ACTIONS
Abstract
OBJECTIVETo evaluate long-term cost effectiveness of telbivudine and lamivudine for the treatment of CHB.
METHODSCost effectiveness was conducted from social health insurance perspective. A Markov model was established based on disease progression pattern and the data from the 2 years GLOBE clinical trial. The information of annual medical expenditure and quality-of-life assessment for different CHB-related diseases was obtained from literature. Incremental cost per life year or quality-adjusted life year gained was measured.
RESULTSCompared with lamivudine, the incremental cost for 1 additional QALY gained with telbivudine in treating HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB were 5403 yuan and 28239 yuan in Beijing, as well 4916 yuan and 29618 yuan in Guangzhou, respectively. According to national economic burden of CHB-related diseases, the ICER with telbivudine vs lamivudine were 1282 yuan and 31565 yuan for HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB.
CONCLUSIONAccording to WHO recommendation for ICER threshold, telbivudine is cost effective in treating HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB, as compared to lamivudine.
备案号: 11010502037788, 京ICP备10218182号-8)