External rhinoplasty based on the classification of alar retraction associating with exposure of the nostrils.
10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20220305-00097
- VernacularTitle:基于鼻孔暴露度鼻翼退缩分型的外鼻整形术
- Author:
Xian Cheng WANG
1
;
Yi Wen DENG
2
;
Yang SUN
1
;
Xian Xi MENG
1
;
Xiang XIONG
1
;
Bai Rong FANG
1
;
Xiao Fang LI
1
;
Kai YANG
1
;
Quan Ding YAN
1
;
Yi TIAN
1
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Aesthetic (Burn) Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
2. Rhinoplasty Research Center, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Male;
Female;
Humans;
Adult;
Rhinoplasty;
Retrospective Studies;
Patient Satisfaction;
Treatment Outcome;
Esthetics;
Nose/surgery*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2023;58(2):126-132
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To introduce a classification of alar retraction, and to discuss the therapeutic strategy of alar retraction with cartilage graft and the satisfaction evaluation of patients after operation. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 88 patients with alar retraction admitted to the Department of Plastic and Aesthetic (Burn) Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2015 to December 2020, including 20 males and 68 females, aged 20 to 48 years, with an average age of 28.98 years. All patients underwent external rhinoplasty according to a series of treatment plans determined by the classification of alar retraction based on nostril exposure. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) were used to conduct satisfaction survey before and 12 months after operation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 88 patients were included in this study. According to the classification of alar retraction based on nostril exposure, 45 cases were mild, 23 cases were moderate, and 20 cases were severe. There were 16 cases of unilateral and 72 cases of bilateral alar retraction. The patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months, with an average of 13.37 months. The VAS score and ROE score after each type of surgery were higher than those before surgery, with statistically significant (all P<0.05). Among them, the difference in VAS score (6.75±1.29) and in ROE satisfaction (67.70±7.38) of patients with severe alar retraction were the most significant improvement. Conclusion: The classification of alar retraction based on nostril exposure in the frontal view can comprehensively evaluate the severity of alar retraction, and makes the treatment algorithms systematic and comprehensive. The satisfaction of patients is relatively high.
