Efficacy comparison of Jensen and augmented Hummelsheim procedure in the treatment of complete paralytic esotropia
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2023.2.33
- VernacularTitle:直肌联结术与改良部分直肌转位术治疗完全性麻痹性内斜视的疗效比较
- Author:
Gui-Ou ZHANG
1
;
Lu ZHANG
1
;
Na-Min LI
1
;
Jian ZHOU
1
;
Chang-Mei GUO
1
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
paralytic esotropia;
complete;
Jensen procedure;
Hummelsheim procedure;
Foster suture
- From:
International Eye Science
2023;23(2):349-352
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
AIM: To compare the efficacy of Jensen and augmented Hummelsheim procedures in the treatment of complete paralytic esotropia.METHOD: A total of 35 patients(44 eyes)who were diagnosed with complete paralytic esotropia from October 2016 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 15 cases(21 eyes)underwent Jensen procedure combined with recession of antagonist muscle(Jensen procedure group), and 20 cases(23 eyes)received augmented Hummelsheim procedure combined with recession of antagonist muscle(Hummelsheim procedure group). The operation time, preoperative and postoperative esotropia deviation, degree of abduction paralysis, recession of medial rectus muscle and cure rate were observed.RESULTS: Clinical data and operation time of the patients in two groups were not statistically significant(P >0.05). During the last follow-up, the esotropia deviation of Jensen procedure group decreased from 102.33±41.70PD to 3.93±4.82PD(P<0.001), and it decreased from 94.75±33.03PD to 2.85±5.96PD in Hummelsheim procedure group(P<0.001), while the degree of abduction paralysis were significantly improved from -4.81±0.40 to -1.57±0.51 in the Jensen procedure group(P<0.001)and from -4.91±0.29 to -1.22±0.42 in Hummelsheim procedure group(P<0.001). Besides, there was no statistical difference in postoperative esotropia deviation between the two groups(P>0.05), but the degree of postoperative abduction paralysis in the Hummelsheim procedure group was significantly better than that of Jensen procedure group(P<0.05). The recession of medial rectus muscle of the two groups were 7.16±2.07 and 6.37±2.34 mm, respectively(P>0.05). During the last follow-up, in the Jensen procedure group, 2 patients were undercorrection(+10PD and +12PD respectively)and 13 cases(87%)were cured. In the Hummelsheim procedure group, 1 patient was undercorrection(+25PD)and 19 patients were cured(95%), and there was no statistical significance in cure rates of the two groups(P=0.565).CONCLUSIONS: Both Jensen procedure and augmented Hummelsheim procedure can effectively treat complete paralytic esotropia, and the latter is more effective in improving the abduction paralysis.
