Status quo of hemoglobin a1c in community-dwelling patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its relationship with health literacy
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20210829-01006
- VernacularTitle:社区2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白达标现状及与健康素养的关系
- Author:
Xuan ZHANG
1
;
Liangliang GAO
;
Xiaorong LIU
;
Yan WU
;
Meng XU
Author Information
1. 济宁医学院附属湖西医院 单县中心医院内分泌科，菏泽 274300
- Keywords:
Diabetes mellitus,type 2;
HbA1c;
Health literacy;
Correlation;
Factors affecting;
Renal function;
Chronic diseases;
Community management
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2022;29(8):1209-1213
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the status quo of hemoglobin a1c (HbA1c) in community-dwelling patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its relationship with health literacy, and analyze the factors that affect HbA1c level.Methods:A total of 134 patients with T2DM who received treatment in Hbxi Hospital Affiliated to Jining Medical University (Shanxian Central Hospital) from February 2019 to February 2020 were included in this study. All patients were divided into standard group (HBA1c < 7%, n = 61) and substandard group (HbA1c ≥ 7%, n = 73) according to HbA1c level. Fasting elbow venous blood was collected to measure relevant biochemical indexes. General data were collected from patients in the two groups. The Chinese Citizen Health Literacy Questionnaire was used to evaluate the health literacy level in patients from the two groups. Results:Serum levels of creatinine, blood uric acid and blood urea nitrogen in the substandard group were significantly higher than those in the standard group (all P < 0.05). Health literacy score in the substandard group was significantly lower than that in the standard group ( P < 0.05). The percentage of patients who smoked or had relevant complications among all included patients in the substandard group was 17.81% and 16.44%, respectively, which were significantly higher than 3.28% and 4.92%,respectively, in the standard group ( χ2 = 7.05, 4.43, both P < 0.05). The percentage of patients who had regular glucose level among all included patients in the substandard group was significantly lower than that in the standard group (63.93% vs. 80.82%, χ2 = 4.82, P < 0.05). Pearson analysis results showed that HbA1c level was significantly negatively correlated with health literacy score, with the correlation coefficient r of -0.80. Logistic regression model results showed that serum levels of creatinine and blood uric acid were independent risk factors for substandard level of HbA1c, with an OR value of 3.81 (95% CI: 1.60-9.09) and 1.03 (95% CI:1.01-1.06), respectively. Health literacy score was a protective factor for substandard level of HbA1c, with an OR value of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.10-0.54). Conclusion:Less than 50% of community-dwelling patients have standard HbA1c levels. Health literacy score is remarkably negatively correlated with HbA1c level. Health literacy score is a protective factor for HbA1c level, while serum creatinine and blood uric acid are independent risk factors for substandard HbA1c.
