Preliminary clinical effect evaluation of digital head and neck radiotherapy oral positioning stents.
10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20220701-00360
- VernacularTitle:数字化头颈部放疗口腔定位支架临床应用的初步评价
- Author:
Fang Fang SUN
1
;
Rong HUANG
1
;
Jia Li MENG
1
;
Jing YAN
2
;
Bao TANG
3
;
Guo Feng WU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China.
2. Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.
3. Nanjing Profeta Intelligent Technology Corperation, Nanjing 211112, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Female;
Young Adult;
Adult;
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy*;
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy*;
Tongue;
Stents;
Neck;
Radiotherapy Dosage
- From:
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2022;57(10):1022-1028
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To develop a designing software of digital oral positioning stent for radiotherapy of head and neck, and to compare its clinical effect with traditional oral positioning stents made by lost wax process. Methods: Thirty patients with nasopharyngeal cancer who received oral examination before radiotherapy in the prosthodontics department from July to December, 2021, were selected and divided into three groups according to the patients' wishes, 10 per group: one group without radiotherapy oral positioning stents, one group with traditional oral positioning stents (traditional stents group), and the third group with digital oral positioning stents (digital stents group). Patients' ages range from 20 years old to 71 years old. There were 15 males and 15 females involved in this study. The manufacturing time and comfort of the two positioning stents were evaluated, and the radiation doses of the radiotherapy target areas and surrounding healthy tissues were statistically analyzed at the end of radiotherapy. Results: The manufacturing time of digital stents group [(209±7) min] was much less than that of traditional stents group [(490±10) min] (t=69.85, P<0.001). The comfort of patients' wearing of digital stents [first wearing: 5 (3, 6) score; at the end of radiotherapy: 4 (3, 5) score] was better than that of traditional ones [first wearing: 7 (3, 7) score; at the end of radiotherapy: 7 (3, 7) score] (U=22.00, P=0.033; U=20.50, P=0.023). There was no significant differences in the target radiation doses among the three groups, and the radiation doses of tongue [traditional stents group: (36.74±5.45) Gy; digital stents group: (35.96±4.98) Gy] and mandible [traditional stents group: (35.46±4.19) Gy; digital stents group: (35.34±3.98) Gy] were significantly lower in the patients wearing oral positioning stents than in the patients without oral positioning stents [tongue: (41.49±4.46) Gy; madible: (39.32±3.52) Gy] (P<0.05). Conclusions: Oral positioning stents for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy could greatly reduce the exposure doses of tongue and madible of patients. Digital oral positioning stents designed and manufactured by independently developed software had higher production efficiency than the traditional method, and patients' evaluation of comfort was better.
