Accuracy and safety of robot assisted pedicle screw placement.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.02.003
- Author:
Tong-Tong ZHANG
1
;
Zeng-Ping WANG
1
;
Zhong-Hua WANG
1
;
Qi-Yuan WANG
1
;
Wen XUE
1
;
Yu-Xin SONG
1
;
Lin LIU
1
Author Information
1. The Second Department of Orthopaedics, People's Hospital of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Accuracy;
Pedicle screws;
Robotic surgical procedures;
Safety;
Surgery, computer-assisted
- MeSH:
Adolescent;
Adult;
Female;
Fluoroscopy/methods*;
Humans;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Pedicle Screws;
Retrospective Studies;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*;
Robotics;
Scoliosis;
Spinal Fusion/methods*;
Surgery, Computer-Assisted;
Young Adult
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2022;35(2):108-112
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement assisted by orthopedic robot and C-arm fluoroscopy.
METHODS:The clinical data of 36 patients with spinal diseases underwent surgical treatment from January 2019 to August 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 18 cases were implanted pedicle screws assisted by orthopaedic robot(observation group), including 12 males and 6 females, aged from 16 to 61 years with an average of (38.44±3.60) years;there were 1 case of adolescent scoliosis, 1 case of spinal tuberculosis, 7 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis, 4 cases of thoracic fracture and 5 cases of lumbar fracture. Another 18 cases were implanted pedicle screws assisted by C-arm fluoroscopy(control group), including 10 males and 8 females, aged from 18 to 58 years with an average of (43.22±2.53) years;there were 1 case of adolescent scoliosis, 6 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis, 6 cases of thoracic fracture and 5 cases of lumbar fracture. The intraoperative fluoroscopy times, nail placement time and postoperative complications were recorded in two groups. CT scan was performed after operation. The Gertzbein-Robbins standard was used to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement which was calculated.
RESULTS:The number of intraoperative fluoroscopy in observation group was(6.89±0.20) times, which was significantly higher than that in control group(14.00±0.18)times(P<0.05). The placement time of each screw in observation group was(2.56±0.12) min, which was significantly different from that in control group(4.22±0.17) min (P<0.05). One case of incision infection occurred in control group after operation, and recovered after active dressing change. During the follow-up period, no serious complications such as screw loosening and fracture occurred in two groups, and there was no significant difference in complications between two groups(P>0.05). A total of 107 screws were placed in observation group, including 101 screws in class A, 4 in class B, 2 in class C, 0 in class D and 0 in class E, the accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement=[(number of screws in class A+B) / the number of all screws placed in the group] ×100%=98.1%(105/107); and a total of 104 screws were placed in control group, including 90 screws in class A, 4 in class B, 5 in class C, 5 in class D and 0 in class E, the accuracy rate of pedicle screw implantation=[(number of screws in class A+B/the number of all screws placed in the group]×100%=90.3% (94/104); there was significant difference between two groups (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:Orthopaedic robot assisted pedicle screw placement has the advantages of less fluoroscopy times, shorter screw placement time and higher accuracy, which can further improve the surgical safety and has a broad application prospect in the orthopaedic.
