Audit of Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) inpatient management: a retrospective assessment
- Author:
Shyh P. Teo
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
npatients, Secondary Prevention, Stroke, Transient ischaemic attack, Audit of Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Inpatient Management
- From:
Pacific Journal of Medical Sciences
2020;20(2):27-37
- CountryPapua New Guinea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The aim of this retrospective study was to audit the management of transient ischaemic attack (TIA)
patients admitted in 2012 compared to a previous audit (2009 to mid-2010). Data were obtained by
reviewing the electronic clinical records of patients. Data on patient demographics, patient assessment and management according to TIA guidelines were collected. A total of 61 patients were admitted to hospital with primary diagnosis of TIA. One in four patients had an alternative diagnosis. TIA severity (ABCD2 score) was not calculated in 13% of the patients. Most patients had computed tomography (CT) brain imaging performed. Antiplatelet therapy was not adjusted in 10% of patients. Carotid doppler ultrasound was not considered in 20% of the patients. Most of the carotid dopplers were done within one week. Only 6.6% of the patients were referred for carotid endarterectomy. Blood pressure medications were not optimised in 57.4% of the patients. Only 27.9% were prescribed statin therapy. Not all patients had documented ECG findings or discussion regarding anticoagulation. There was a 32.8% 3-month readmission rate. In 2012 several aspects of TIA guideline management were not done appropriately compared to the previous audit. The areas of improvement identified in this assessment include optimising antiplatelet therapy and blood pressure management, as well as timely carotid ultrasound for anterior circulation TIA. Further education and reiteration of guideline-based TIA management is recommended. A follow-up audit of the service is warranted
