Usefullness of CT Gastrography and Vurtual Gastroscopy using Computed Tomography in Detection of Gastric Cancer.
10.5230/jkgca.2003.3.4.195
- Author:
Yong Hae BAIK
1
;
Soon Jin LEE
;
Ji Yun LEE
;
Jae Hyung NOH
;
Tae Sung SOHN
;
Sung KIM
;
Yong Il KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sungkimm@smc samsung.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stomach cancer;
CT gastrography;
Virtual gastroscopy
- MeSH:
Diagnosis;
Fasting;
Female;
Gastrointestinal Tract;
Gastroscopy*;
Humans;
Male;
Stomach;
Stomach Neoplasms*;
Supine Position;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- From:Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association
2003;3(4):195-200
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Advancement of computed tomography (CT) hardware and software has allowed thin section scanning and reconstruction of fascinating 2-dimentional (2D) and 3- dimentional (3D) images. Especially, the reconstruction of 3D images of gastrointestinal tract has been used in the detection and diagnosis of pre-malignant and malignant diseases. To compare the efficacy of CT gastrography with conventional upper gastrointenstinal series (UGIs) in gastric cancer patients. MATENRIALS AND METHODS: During Nov. 2002 and Mar. 2003, twenty-seven patients who had gastric cancer received both double contrast upper GI series and CT gastrography prior to radical surgery. Among these patients, nineteen had early gastric cancer (EGC) and 8 had advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Fifteen patients were male and 12 were female. The mean age was 54 yrs (range, 27~75 yrs). The patients were placed on NPO and Stomach was distended with gas in fasting state prior to CT scanning. Double contrast upper GI series were performed as routine manual. CT scan was conducted in all patients using 8 or 16-channel multidetector CT in this study. The collimation and reconstruction for CT scanning were set at 2.5 mm and 1.25 mm, respectively. CT scanning was performed in the supine position. For image processing, CT gastrography, in which raysum and surface rendering images were constructed, virtual and 2D image in coronal and sagittal images were performed. The detectability of gastric cancer was assessed between UGIs and CT gastrography. RESULTS: In AGCs, the detection rate of cancer using CT gastrography and virtual gastroscopy was higher than EGC cases. However, CT gastrography and virtual gastroscopy showed less favorable results than UGIs. Even though only a small number of cases had been studied, we might conclude that CT gastrography and virtual gastroscopy could replace UGIs in the detection of AGC cases. CONCLUSION: The detection rate used with CT gastrography and Virtual gastroscopy is not better than that of UGIs in early gastric cancer, however, in advanced gastric cancer cases, it is nearly equal to that of UGIs.
