Theoretical basis of imcompatibility of Euphorbiae Pekinensis Radix and Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma based on diuretic and purgative effects on mice
10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2014.14.019
- Author:
Wei-Wei TAO
1
Author Information
1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for High Technology Research of TCM Formulae, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Euphorbiae Pekinensis Radix;
Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma;
Incompatibility;
Mechanism of drug property;
Removing water retention by purgation
- From:
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs
2014;45(14):2056-2059
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the theoretical basis of incompatibility of Euphorbiae pekinensis Radix (EPR) and Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma (GRR). Methods: In order to compare the effects of EPR used alone and combined with GRR, the diuretic effect was studied by weighing method to observe the urine output of normal mice, while the purgation effect was studied by observing the defecation time, feces pellets, and feces shape after drug administration. Results: In the equivalent dose range of China Pharmacopoeia 2010, the diuretic effect of EPR powder is stronger than its aqueous extract; GRR aqueous extract did not show any promoting or suppressing effect on the diuresis; Within 1 h after coadministration of EPR powder and GRR aqueous extract, urine output was significantly reduced, suggesting that GRR might inhibit the diuretic effect of EPR; The co-detection of EPR and GRR did not cause the obvious changes of urine output. There was no significant purgative effect of EPR powder alone and coadministered with GRR aqueous extract at the same dose level. Conclusion: The diuretic effect of EPR can be suppressed by GRR in the equivalent dose range of China Pharmacopoeia 2010, suggesting that the sweet and mitigation property of GRR relieving the effect of removing water retention by purgation is one of the incompatibility theoretical basis between EPR and GRR.
