Comparison of alveolar bone changes in maxillary anterior area secondary to different kinds of retraction method of anterior teeth: a cone-beam computed tomography study
10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2018.11.019
- Author:
Di ZHOU
1
Author Information
1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education, Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Alveolar bone remodeling;
Angle's class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion;
Anterior teeth retraction;
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)
- From:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Medical Science)
2018;38(11):1375-1380
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective • Using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to compare alveolar bone changes in maxillary anterior area secondary to maxillary incisor retraction adjunct with tip (R&Tp) and retraction adjunct with torque (R&Tq) movements. Methods • Forty teenagers with Angle's class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion who had completed orthodontic treatment met the inclusion criteria and were selected, and all of their 160 maxillary incisors were classified into two categories, namely R&Tp group and R&Tq group, according to their actual retraction pattern. Pre- and post-treatment CBCT images and 3D measurement software were used to measure and analyze tooth retraction and alveolar bone height and thickness changes within each group and to compare treatment changes of teeth and alveolar bone between two groups. Results • Anterior teeth in each group were intensively retracted and uprighted, with a longer retraction distance of incisal edge and a greater retraction angle of teeth in R&Tp group than in R&Tq group (both P=0.000). Alveolar bone thickness was significantly decreased at L3 and P1 in R&Tp group (both P<0.05), while it was significantly decreased at P1 and P2 in R&Tq group (both P<0.05). Total alveolar bone thickness decreased at T1 in R&Tp group (P=0.000) and at all levels in R&Tq group (all P=0.000). Finally, alveolar ridge height in two groups dropped both in the buccal (both P=0.000) and palatal (both P=0.000) sides, with a more prominent extent in the palatal side, and ridge height dropped most in palatal side of the teeth in R&Tq group. Conclusion • The buccal root apex area and the palatal alveolar ridge area of alveolar bone in the R&Tp group and the cervical and middle area of incisor root in palatal side of alveolar bone in the R&Tq group are high-risk areas for alveolar bone resorption when anterior teeth in teenagers with Angle's class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion are intended to have en masse retraction.
