Inter-Observer Variation in Ultrasound Measurement of the Volume and Diameter of Thyroid Nodules.
10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.560
- Author:
Young Jun CHOI
1
;
Jung Hwan BAEK
;
Min Ji HONG
;
Jeong Hyun LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 138-736, Korea. radbaek@naver.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Ultrasound;
Thyroid nodule;
Volume and diameter measurement
- MeSH:
Adult;
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Observer Variation;
Organ Size/physiology;
Physical Examination/*statistics & numerical data;
Retrospective Studies;
Thyroid Gland/pathology/*ultrasonography;
Thyroid Nodule/*ultrasonography;
Young Adult
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology
2015;16(3):560-565
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Thyroid nodule measurement using ultrasonography (US) is widely performed in various clinical scenarios. The purpose of this study was to evaluate inter-observer variation in US measurement of the volume and maximum diameter of thyroid nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 73 consecutive patients with 85 well-defined thyroid nodules greater than 1 cm in their maximum diameter. US examinations were independently performed by using standardized measurement methods, conducted by two clinically experienced thyroid radiologists. The maximum nodule diameter and nodule volume, calculated from nodule diameters using the ellipsoid formula, were obtained by each reader. Inter-observer variations in volume and maximum diameter were determined using 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement. The degree of inter-observer variations in volumes and the maximum diameters were compared using the Student's t test, between nodules < 2 cm in maximum diameter and those with > or = 2 cm. RESULTS: The mean inter-observer difference in measuring the nodule volume was -1.6%, in terms of percentage of the nodule volume, and the 95% limit of agreement was +/- 13.1%. For maximum nodule diameter, the mean inter-observer difference was -0.6%, in terms of percentage of the nodule diameter, and the 95% limit of agreement was +/- 7.3%. Inter-observer variation in volume was greater in nodules of < 2 cm in maximum diameter, compared to the larger nodules (p = 0.035). However, no statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups regarding maximum nodule diameters (p = 0.511). CONCLUSION: Any differences smaller than 13.1% and 7.3% in volume and maximum diameter, respectively, measured by using US for well-defined thyroid nodules of > 1 cm should not be considered as a real change in size.
