METHODS:Based on the degree of eccentricity of OK lenses, patients were divided into three groups: a low degree of eccentricity group(degree of eccentricity ≤0.5 mm), a group of moderate eccentricity(eccentric degree >0.5-≤1.0 mm)and a group with a high degree of eccentricity(eccentric degree >1-≤1.5 mm). The degree of eccentricity of the OK lens, spherical equivalent(SE), the uncorrected visual acuity after wearing OK lenses(UCVA), axial length before and after wearing OK lenses(AL), total higher-order aberrations(HOA), comas, and spherical aberrations(SA)for 3 mm pupils were analyzed. The difference among the three groups for all parameters was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H Rank-Sum test.

RESULTS:The study retrospectively analyzed 75 cases(139 eyes). In the low eccentricity group(53 eyes), the mean age was 11.4±2.4 years, SE was -3.24±1.48 D, and AL was 24.85±1.01 mm. In the moderate eccentricity group(53 eyes), the mean age was 11.4±2.2 years, SE was -3.22±1.29 D, and AL was 25.15±0.92 mm. In the high eccentricity group(31 eyes), the mean age was 11.5±1.9 years, SE was -3.54±1.43 D, and AL was 24.95±0.84mm. After two years, there was no significant difference in the changes of the axis among the three groups(P=0.089). The HOA, SA, and coma in the high eccentric group were significantly higher than in the middle eccentric group(P<0.05). The HOA, SA, and coma in the high eccentric group were also significantly higher than those in the low eccentric group(P<0.05).

CONCLUSION:For OK lenses, it is unnecessary to strictly require the absolute centralization of the lens position. An unnecessary change of the lenses may delay the eye-axis control. However, the balance between axial control and visual quality should be assessed.