Alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus
10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.38
- Author:
Yoon Joo CHOI
1
;
Young Hyun KIM
;
Sang Sun HAN
;
Ui Won JUNG
;
Chena LEE
;
Ari LEE
;
Kug Jin JEON
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea. sshan@yuhs.ac
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
2020;50(1):38-47
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE:The aim of this study was to investigate the available alveolar bone height between the maxillary molars and the sinus floor according to their anatomical relationship using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images.
METHODS:A total of 752 maxillary first (M1) and second molars (M2) on CBCT scans of 188 patients were selected. First, each maxillary molar was categorized as type 1, 2, 3, or 4 according to the relationship of the molar root with the maxillary sinus floor. The frequency distribution of each type was analyzed. Second, the shortest vertical distance (VD) of each molar was measured from the furcation midpoints of the roots to the lowest point of the sinus floor by 2 observers. Intraclass correlation coefficients and the t-test were calculated for the VD measurements.
RESULTS:For M1, type 3 was the most frequent, followed by type 2. For M2, type 3 was the most common, followed by type 1. The VD measurements of type 1 were 9.51±3.68 mm and 8.07±2.73 mm for M1 and M2, and those of type 3 were 3.70±1.52 mm and 4.03±1.53 mm for M1 and M2, respectively. The VD measurements of M2 were significantly higher in female patients than in male patients.
CONCLUSIONS:Type 3 was the most frequent anatomical relationship in the maxillary molars, and showed the lowest alveolar bone height. This information will help clinicians to prevent complications related to the maxillary sinus during maxillary molar treatment and to predict the available bone height for immediate implant planning.
