Comparison of biomechanical properties by different posterior fixation methods with or without crosslink for fixing thoracolumbar fractures
10.3871/j.1004-7220.2016.02.142
- VernacularTitle:3种不同后路内固定方式及其横连治疗胸腰段骨折的力学性能比较
- Author:
Wei-bo YU
1
;
De LIANG
2
;
Lin-qiang YE
1
;
Xiao-bing JIANG
2
;
Xue-cheng HUANG
1
;
Zhen-song YAO
2
Author Information
1. Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital; The First School of Clinic Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
2. Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital，Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Thoracolumbar fractures;
Crosslink;
Internal fixation;
Mechanical properties;
Finite element analysis
- From:
Journal of Medical Biomechanics
2016;31(2):E142-E147
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the biomechanical differences in 3 posterior fixation methods with or without crosslink for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, so as to find the optimal posterior fixation methods. Methods On the basis of the validated finite element model of T12-L2 segments to simulate L1 vertebra burst fracture, the superior 1/2 cortical bone of T12 segment was removed and the superior 1/2 cancellous bone was assigned with the material damage property of cancellous bone. Then 6 thoracolumbar fracture models by intermediate unilateral pedicle screw fixation without or with crosslink (Model A1, A2), traditional short-segment pedicle screw fixation without or with crosslink (Model B1, B2), intermediate bilateral pedicle screw fixation without or with crosslink (Model C1,C2) were established, respectively. The range of motion (ROM) as well as the maximum Von Mises stress of the pedicle screw and rod for 6 models under various physiological loading conditions were compared. Results The ROM under flexion-extension and lateral bending in Model A and Model C was obviously smaller than that of Model B. Under flexion-extension, no significant difference was found in ROM between Model A and Model C; under lateral bending, the ROM of Model C was smaller than that of Model A. The stress was concentrated in the root of upper screw and the rob located between upper screw and intermediate screw; the maximum stress of upper screw in Model C was smaller than that in Model A and Model B. The crosslink could increase the stability of all fixation groups under axial rotation stress condition, and decrease the maximum stress on upper screw and rod under axial rotation stress condition, but no significant difference was found under flexion-extension and lateral bending. Conclusions Additional pedicle screws at the level of fracture vertebra can achieve the better biochemical stability. The additional crosslink not only increases the torsional rigidity, but also decreases the maximum torsional stress of the screw and rod, which is a better choice as the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.
