Prognostic analysis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9921.2020.01.007
- VernacularTitle: 异基因造血干细胞移植治疗老年人急性髓系白血病预后分析
- Author:
Wenli ZHANG
1
;
Chang HOU
1
;
Meng SHAN
1
;
Yin LIU
1
;
Dong WANG
1
;
Qiao CHENG
1
;
Yang XU
1
;
Depei WU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis of Ministry of Health, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Suzhou 215006, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Leukemia, myeloid, acute;
Elderly;
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation;
Prognosis
- From:
Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma
2020;29(1):30-36
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the prognosis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Methods:The clinical data of 53 elderly patients (≥55 years old) with AML who received allo-HSCT in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from June 2008 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients included haplo-HSCT (26 cases), matched-sibling donors (MSD)-HSCT (18 cases), matched or mismatched unrelated donors (9 cases). The efficacy of allo-HSCT for elderly patients with AML was analyzed, and the efficacy and safety of haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT were compared.
Results:There were 35 males and 18 females among 53 elderly AML patients. The median age was 57 years old (55-67 years old), and 45 patients received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen while 8 patients received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen. There were 52 patients who were successfully implanted in granulocyte, and the median time for engraftment was 12 d (10-23 d). There were 50 patients who were successfully implanted in megakaryocyte and the median time for engraftment was 13 d (10-76 d). The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 49.1% (26/53), and the incidence of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ acute GVHD was 15.1% (8/53), respectively. The median follow-up time was 14.7 months (0.4-136.8 months), and 32 patients survived. The rate of 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and graft-versus-host-free-relapse free survival (GRFS) was 63.1%, 59.5% and 46.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that non-complete remission (CR) state before transplantation was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 3.600, 95% CI 1.213-10.684, P = 0.021), DFS (HR = 2.596, 95% CI 1.098-6.138, P = 0.030) and relapse (HR = 3.957, 95% CI 1.099-14.245, P = 0.035). Donor age > 45 years old was an independent risk factor for OS (HR = 3.687, 95% CI 1.343-10.215, P = 0.011). Time from diagnosis to transplantation ≥6 months was an independent risk factor for GRFS (HR = 2.308, 95%CI 1.083-4.918, P = 0.030). There were no statistical differences in OS rate, DFS rate, cumulative relapse rate, the incidence of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ acute GVHD and moderate to severe chronic GVHD between haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT (all P > 0.05).
Conclusions:The preliminary results show that allo-HSCT is an effective and safe treatment for elderly AML patients. In addition, haplo-HSCT is similar to MSD-HSCT in the efficacy and safety, indicating that haplo-HSCT could be a better treatment option for elderly AML patients under the circumstance without non-identical donor.
