Recurrence of Melanoma After Initial Treatment: Diagnostic Performance of FDG PET in Posttreatment Surveillance
10.1007/s13139-018-0537-6
- Author:
Hwan Hee LEE
1
;
Jin Chul PAENG
;
Gi Jeong CHEON
;
Dong Soo LEE
;
June Key CHUNG
;
Keon Wook KANG
Author Information
1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, South Korea. paengjc@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
FDG;
PET-CT;
Melanoma;
Surveillance
- MeSH:
Diagnosis;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Melanoma;
Positron-Emission Tomography;
Recurrence;
Retrospective Studies;
Sensitivity and Specificity
- From:Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
2018;52(5):327-333
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: In malignant melanoma, recurrence is often observed in distant areas from the primary site. While FDG PET is a sensitive imaging for detecting malignant lesions, the role of FDG PET in posttreatment surveillance period has not been investigated sufficiently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of PET during posttreatment surveillance in melanoma.METHODS: A total of 76 melanoma patients who underwent FDG PET during surveillance period after completion of the first treatment were retrospectively enrolled. PET scans were grouped according to the purpose and clinical situations, routine surveillance, or evaluating clinical suspicion. Final diagnosis of recurrence was determined by complete clinical evaluation or long-term follow-up. In each situation, the diagnostic role of FDG PET was assessed.RESULTS: A total of 143 scans of 76 patients were analyzed: 51 for clinical suspicion and 92 for routine surveillance. In the clinical suspicion group, PET correctly diagnosed non-recurrence in 10 cases (20%). In routine surveillance group, 16 cases (17%) presented recurrence, all of which was correctly diagnosed on PET. NPVand PPV were 100% and 76%, respectively. In subgroup analysis, sensitivity and NPV were higher in the low-risk group (stages I–II(A)) than in the high-risk group (stages II(B)–IV), while specificity and PPV were higher in the high-risk group.CONCLUSION: In conclusion, FDG PET is an effective diagnostic tool in posttreatment surveillance of melanoma. Even in cases without clinical suspicion, melanoma recurs in a considerable proportion of patients, which can be sensitively diagnosed on PET.
