Comparison of nighttime and daytime operation on outcomes of kidney transplant with deceased donors: a retrospective analysis.
10.1097/CM9.0000000000000056
- Author:
Qi-Hang GUO
1
;
Qian-Long LIU
1
;
Xiao-Jun HU
1
;
Yang LI
1
;
Jin ZHENG
1
;
Wu-Jun XUE
1
Author Information
1. Department of Renal Transplant, Center of Nephropathy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Adult;
Cadaver;
Cold Ischemia;
Female;
Graft Survival;
Humans;
Kidney Transplantation;
adverse effects;
mortality;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Retrospective Studies;
Survival Rate;
Time Factors
- From:
Chinese Medical Journal
2019;132(4):395-404
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Kidney transplant is always emergent operations and frequently need to be performed at nighttime to reduce cold ischemia time (CIT). Previous studies have revealed that fatigue and sleep deprivation can result in adverse consequences of medical procedures. This study aimed to evaluate whether nighttime operation has adverse impact on kidney transplant.
METHODS:A retrospective analysis of recipients accepted kidney transplant from deceased donors in one center from 2014 to 2016 was performed. Daytime transplant was defined as operation started after 8 AM or ended before 8 PM and nighttime operation was defined as operation ended after 8 PM or started before 8 AM. The incidences of complications such as delayed graft function, acute rejection, surgical complications and nosocomial infections were compared between 2 groups. Student's t-test was used to analyze continuous variables such as serum creatinine (Scr) at 1-year of post-transplant. The Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables. Differences in recipients and graft survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology and log-rank tests.
RESULTS:Among the 443 recipients, 233 (52.6%) were classified into the daytime group and the others 210 (47.4%) were in the nighttime group. The 1-year survival rate of recipients was similar for the recipients in the daytime and nighttime groups (95.3% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.981). Although the 1-year graft survival rate in the nighttime group was slightly superior to that in the daytime group, the difference was not significant (92.4% vs. 88.4%, P = 0.164). Furthermore, Scr and incidence of complications were also not significantly different between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS:Our results suggested that operation time of kidney transplant with short CIT has no significant impact on the outcome of kidney transplant. Nighttime operation of kidney transplant with short CIT could be postponed to the following day to alleviate the burden on medical staffs and avoid the potential risk.
