An Investigation and Suggestions for the Improvement of Brain Death Determination in China.
- Author:
Ying-Ying SU
1
;
Wei-Bi CHEN
1
;
Gang LIU
1
;
Lin-Lin FAN
1
;
Yan ZHANG
1
;
Hong YE
1
;
Dai-Quan GAO
1
;
Yi-Fei LIU
1
;
Meng-Di JIANG
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Ancillary Tests; Apnea Testing; Brain Death
- MeSH: Brain Death; diagnosis; physiopathology; Electroencephalography; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory; Humans; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2018;131(24):2910-2914
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Brain death is the irreversible cessation of the function of the brain including the brainstem. In 2013, the Brain Injury Evaluation Quality Control Centre (BQCC) of the National Health and Family Planning Commission issued criteria and practical guidelines for the determination of brain death. This study aimed to evaluate whether the institutions have adopted these guidelines and to make suggestions for the improvement of the current criteria and practical guidelines for brain death determination in China.
Methods:Consecutive brain death cases from 44 hospitals were evaluated for summary statistics for the following data: the performance of BQCC criteria and practical guidelines, clinical examination, apnea testing, ancillary testing, and the number of examinations as well as the waiting periods between examinations and details of who determined brain death. Data analysis was conducted from January 2013 to December 2017.
Results:A total of 550 cases were obtained. All patients were determined to have deep coma and met the prerequisites for clinical testing. The performance rates of four brainstem reflex examinations (except cough reflex) ranged from 97.5% to 98.0%, and the completion rate as well as the coincidence rate were both 100.0%. The 238 cases (50.7%) completed apnea testing, and 231 cases (42.0%) had to stop apnea testing during the examination because of instability. The performance rates of the three ancillary tests, including electroencephalogram, short-latency somatosensory evoked potential, and transcranial Doppler, were 89.5%, 67.5%, and 79.5%, respectively; furthermore, the coincidence rates were 98.6%, 96.5%, and 99.5%, respectively. The combination of two ancillary tests was more accurate than one single ancillary test. A total of 401 (72.9%) cases successfully underwent two separate examinations to determine brain death with at least a 12-h waiting period. All brain death cases were determined by at least two qualified physicians.
Conclusion:This study might provide suggestions for brain death determination in China.
