Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs. Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Multivessel Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.
- Author:
Se Hun KANG
1
;
Cheol Whan LEE
;
Sung Cheol YUN
;
Pil Hyung LEE
;
Jung Min AHN
;
Duk Woo PARK
;
Soo Jin KANG
;
Seung Whan LEE
;
Young Hak KIM
;
Seong Wook PARK
;
Seung Jung PARK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Coronary artery bypass; Coronary disease; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Renal insufficiency
- MeSH: Coronary Artery Bypass*; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Disease; Coronary Vessels*; Drug-Eluting Stents; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Renal Insufficiency; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic*; Stroke; Transplants
- From:Korean Circulation Journal 2017;47(3):354-360
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is currently a limited amount of data that demonstrate the optimal revascularization strategy for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). We compared the long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for multivessel CAD in patients with CKD. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 2108 CKD patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) with multivessel CAD that were treated with PCI with DES (n=1165) or CABG (n=943). The primary outcome was a composite of all causes of mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The mean age was 66.9±9.1 years. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 41.4 (interquartile range 12.1-75.5) months. The primary outcome occurred in 307 (26.4%) patients in the PCI group compared with 304 (32.2%) patients in the CABG group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.941; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–1.12; p=0.493). The two groups exhibited similar rates of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77–1.09; p=0.295), myocardial infarction (adjusted HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.85–4.07; p=0.120) and stroke (3.2% vs. 4.8%; HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.57–1.61; p=0.758). However, PCI was associated with significantly increased rates of repeat revascularization (adjusted HR, 4.72; 95% CI, 3.20–6.96; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Among patients with CKD and multivessel CAD, PCI with DES when compared with CABG resulted in similar rates of composite outcome of mortality from any cause, MI, or stroke; however, a higher risk of repeat revascularization was observed.
