Penile Prosthesis Infection: Myths and Realities
- Author:
Kevin J HEBERT
1
;
Tobias S KOHLER
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Erectile dysfunction; Infection; Penile implant; Penile prosthesis; Sexual dysfunction, physiological
- MeSH: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Erectile Dysfunction; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hair Removal; Hand; Health Care Costs; Humans; Immunosuppression; Male; Obesity; Penile Prosthesis; Prostheses and Implants; Risk Factors; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Smoke; Smoking; Spinal Cord Injuries; Staphylococcus aureus; Stress, Psychological; T-Lymphocytes; Tobacco; Urinary Diversion
- From:The World Journal of Men's Health 2019;37(3):276-287
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Penile prosthesis infection is the most significant complication following prosthesis implant surgery leading to postoperative morbidity, increased health care costs, and psychological stress for the patient. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with increased postoperative penile prosthesis infection. A review of the literature was performed via PubMed using search terms including inflatable penile prosthesis, penile implant, and infection. Articles were given a level of evidence score using the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines. Multiple factors were associated with increased risk of post-prosthesis placement infection (Level of Evidence Rating) including smoking tobacco (Level 1), CD4 T-cell count <300 (Level 4), Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage (Level 2), revision surgery (Level 2), prior spinal cord injury (Level 3), and hemoglobin A1c level >8.5 (Level 2). Factors with no effect on infection rate include: preoperative cleansing with antiseptic (Level 4), history of prior radiation (Level 3), history of urinary diversion (Level 4), obesity (Level 3), concomitant circumcision (Level 3), immunosuppression (Level 4), age >75 (Level 4), type of hand cleansing (Level 1), post-surgical drain placement (Level 3), and surgical approach (Level 4). Factors associated with decreased rates of infection included: surgeon experience (Level 2), “No Touch” technique (Level 3), preoperative parenteral antibiotics (Level 2), antibiotic coated devices (Level 2), and operative field hair removal with clippers (Level 1). Optimization of pre-surgical and intraoperative risk factors is imperative to reduce the rate of postoperative penile prosthesis infection. Additional research is needed to elucidate risk factors and maximize benefit.
