Semiautomatic Three-Dimensional Threshold-Based Cardiac Computed Tomography Ventricular Volumetry in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
- Author:
Hyun Woo GOO
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Cardiac CT; Cardiac MRI; Ventricle function; Cardiac volumetric quantification; Congenital heart disease; Threshold-based segmentation
- MeSH: Bias (Epidemiology); Heart Defects, Congenital; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging*; Methods; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Tetralogy of Fallot*
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology 2019;20(1):102-113
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy and potential bias of computed tomography (CT) ventricular volumetry using semiautomatic three-dimensional (3D) threshold-based segmentation in repaired tetralogy of Fallot, and to compare them to those of two-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 32 patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot who had undergone both cardiac CT and MRI within 3 years. For ventricular volumetry, semiautomatic 3D threshold-based segmentation was used in CT, while a manual simplified contouring 2D method was used in MRI. The indexed ventricular volumes were compared between CT and MRI. The indexed ventricular stroke volumes were compared with the indexed arterial stroke volumes measured using phase-contrast MRI. The mean differences and degrees of agreement in the indexed ventricular and stroke volumes were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The indexed end-systolic (ES) volumes showed no significant difference between CT and MRI (p > 0.05), while the indexed end-diastolic (ED) volumes were significantly larger on CT than on MRI (93.6 ± 17.5 mL/m² vs. 87.3 ± 15.5 mL/m² for the left ventricle [p < 0.001] and 177.2 ± 39.5 mL/m² vs. 161.7 ± 33.1 mL/m² for the right ventricle [p < 0.001], respectively). The mean differences between CT and MRI were smaller for the indexed ES volumes (2.0–2.5 mL/m²) than for the indexed ED volumes (6.3–15.5 mL/m²). CT overestimated the stroke volumes by 14–16%. With phase-contrast MRI as a reference, CT (7.2–14.3 mL/m²) showed greater mean differences in the indexed stroke volumes than did MRI (0.8–3.3 mL/m²; p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Compared to 2D MRI, CT ventricular volumetry using semiautomatic 3D threshold-based segmentation provides comparable ES volumes, but overestimates the ED and stroke volumes in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.
