Comparative analysis of PLoS ALMS and ALtmetrics scores and indications for assessing the academic level of individual articles
10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2018.02.005
- VernacularTitle:PLoS ALMs与Altmetrics评分﹑单篇论文学术评价指标的比较分析
- Author:
Jing-Jing CHENG
1
;
YU-Lu WANG
;
Xiao-Qing CHEN
Author Information
1. 浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院
- Keywords:
PLoS ALMS;
ALMS;
Altmetrics score;
Frequency of citation;
h index;
Academic tract T
- From:Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science
2018;27(2):26-33
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To comparatively analyze the the relationship between PLoS ALMs,Altmetrics score and the indications for assessing the academic level of individual articles and their efficiency for assessing the academic level of individual articles. Methods The relationship of the viewed, downloaded, discussed, recommended counts and frequency of citation with Altmetrics score, h index, academic track T and their efficiency for assessing a single pa-per were comparatively analyzed with PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine as an example. Results The viewed, down-loaded and discussed papers were positively related with the frequency of citation and h index, the recommended papers were not related with the h index and academic track T, and the Altmetrics score was moderately related with the red, downloaded and discussed papers, and was weakly related with the frequency of citation. Conclusion PLoS ALMS is a multidimensional assessment. Only it is measured with several indications, can it demonstrate a work’s comprehensive strength.
