Tripterygium glycosides in treatment of henoch-schonlein purpura nephritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20180327.005
- Author:
Jing-Wen WANG
1
;
Xin-Rong ZOU
2
;
Chang-Jiang WANG
3
;
Xiao-Qin WANG
2
Author Information
1. College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430060, China.
2. Department of Nephrology, Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061, China.
3. Department of Nephrology, Invalley Hospital in Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Meta-analysis;
henoch-schonlein purpura nephritis;
randomized controlled trial;
systematic review;
tripterygium glycosides
- From:
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
2018;43(13):2806-2816
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tripterygium glycosides (TG) in the treatment of henoch-schonlein purpura nephritis(HSPN). Seven English and Chinese databases (up to Nov. 9, 2017), were searched to collect the RCTs on TG for HSPN. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the literature. After completion, cross-checking was performed and Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. At the same time, different outcomes of the interventions were analyzed subgroupically. A total of 46 RCTs were included, with 1 659 in the experimental group and 1 596 in the control group. All the clinical studies showed a low quality. In terms of complete remission rate, the group with TG performed better than the group with conventional therapy or GC（RR=1.82，95%CI[1.39，2.39];RR=2.03，95%CI[1.37，2.99]），the group with TG+GC performed better than the group with GC（RR=1.46，95%CI[1.32，1.60]），and the group with CTX+GC performed better than the group with TG+GC（RR=0.35，95%CI[0.16，0.75]）. In terms of total effective rate, the group with TG performed better than the group with conventional therapy or GC（RR=1.44，95%CI[1.19,1.74];RR=1.30，95%CI[1.16，1.46]），the group with TG+GC performed better than the group with GC（RR=1.27，95%CI[1.21，1.34]），and the group with CTX+GC performed better than the group with TG+GC（RR=0.60，95%CI[0.43，0.85]）. No significant difference was found between the group with TG+GC and LEF+GC（RR=0.68，95%CI[0.30，1.53]）. In terms of urinary protein, urine occult blood negative time，the group with TG performed better than the group with conventional therapy（MD=-9.00，95% CI[-11.99，-6.01];MD=-12.00，95%CI[-16.13，-7.87]），the group with TG+GC performed better than the group with GC（MD=-8.86，95%CI[-10.08，-7.64];MD=-16.24，95%CI[-23.80，-8.67]）. In terms of recurrence rate, the group with TG+GC was lower than the group with GC（RR=0.13，95%CI[0.06，0.25]）, but there were no significant difference between the group with TG and conventional therapy（RR=0.43，95%CI[0.15，1.19]）. In adverse reactions, the common adverse effects of TG were gastrointestinal discomfort, liver damage and leucopenia. TG for the treatment of HSPN can improve clinical efficacy, reduce recurrence, and the adverse reactions are relatively safe. Due to the generally low methodological quality of the included studies, which affected the accuracy and reliability of the result. Therefore, more high-quality, large samples and multi-center randomized controlled trials are necessary for further evidence.
