Attach importance to implication of "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" in ophthalmology
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2017.11.001
- VernacularTitle:重视系统评价和Meta分析优先报告条目在眼科的应用
- Author:
Shiming LI
1
;
Ningli WANG
;
Siyan ZHAN
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院北京同仁眼科中心 北京市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室 北京市眼科研究所
- Keywords:
Evidence-based medicine;
Systematic reviews;
Meta analyses;
Report standard;
Clinical research;
Ophthalmology;
Standardization;
Preferred Reporting Items
- From:
Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology
2017;35(11):961-965
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
As a part of evidence-based medical practice to obtain high-level evidence through summarizing previous studies,systematic review and meta-analysis have been paid more and more attention.The number of papers published is increasing recently.However,many relevant published papers in biomedical sciences revealed low quality,such as non-uniform and incomprehensive items,and even unclear narrative in many portions of review.These problems reduced the evidence-based role of systematic review and Meta-analysis paper,and affected the interpretation and effective availability of summarized evidence.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is a report standard,but it has not been well-known in ophthalmology of China.The systematic review and meta-analysis published by Chinese ophthalmologists are less guided by PRISMA.Learning PRISMA is helpful not only for improving quality of papers,but also for acquainting the key elements of high-level clinical research,even for standardizing the medical code of conduct,which are important to make it better for conduct evidence-based research in ophthalmology.
