Effects of External Nasal Dilators on Nasal Respiration and Patency in Patients with Deformity of the Nasal Septum by Mladina ClaSSIFICATION: An Acoustic Rhinometric Study.
- Author:
Soon Kwan HONG
1
;
Hye Jin YOON
;
Chong Nahm KIM
;
Chun Dong KIM
;
Sung Wan BYUN
;
Yun Joung KIM
;
Jee Yun KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. soonkwan@unitel.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Deformity of nasal septum;
Mladina's classification;
External nasal dilator;
Nasal respiration;
Nasal patency;
Acoustic rhinometry
- MeSH:
Acoustics*;
Classification*;
Congenital Abnormalities*;
Humans;
Male;
Nasal Septum*;
Respiration*;
Rhinometry, Acoustic;
Sensation
- From:Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
2000;43(9):942-945
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The external nasal dilator (END) was designed to improve nasal respiration by expanding the nasal valve area and authors have proven in previous reports that the END improves nasal respiration and patency in patient with DSN. The present study attempts to assess the different effects of the END on nasal respiration and patency in DSN patients with dysfunction of the nasal valve area and in those with dysfunction of some other areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourty-six male patients (ages 18-49, average age 31.5) without any other nasal or sinus disease and who are not classified as Mladina types 1, 4 or 7 were used as subjects. The type of DSN was determined by Mladina classification. Those with dysfunction of the nasal valve area (Type 2) were classited as Group A and those with dysfunction of some other anatomical area as Group B (Type 3, 5, 6). The subjective sensation of nasal respiration, average minimum cross-sectional area (MCA) and nasal volume (V5: nasal volume from 0-5 cm) of all subjects were assessed and compared before and after the application of an END. RESULTS: Subjective sensation of nasal respiration, MCA and V, improved sign ificantly in both groups after the application of an END, but there were no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although an F,ND significantly improves nasal respiration and patency, this effect does not show any significant differences between patients with dysfunction of the nasal valve area and those with dysfunction of some other anatomical areas. This is because ENDs equally affect all Types of septal deformity.
