Histopathologic Study on the Obliteration of the Temporal Dorsal Bullae in Rat Using Hydroxyapatite Cement and Demineralized Bone Matrix.
- Author:
Tae Woo GU
1
;
Yoon Seok JANG
;
So Hyang KIM
;
Su Jin KIM
;
Suk Hee HONG
;
Myung Koo KANG
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea. mgkang@dau.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Hydroxyapatite cement;
Bone matrix;
Rats
- MeSH:
Animals;
Blister;
Bone Matrix;
Cholesteatoma;
Durapatite;
Foreign Bodies;
Hydroxyapatites;
Inflammation;
Mastoid;
Mucocele;
Mucous Membrane;
Osteogenesis;
Otitis Media;
Rats;
Regeneration;
Transplants;
Trichloroacetic Acid
- From:Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
2008;51(9):777-782
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mastoid obliteration surgery is a useful technique for otitis media either with or without cholesteatoma. Obliterating materials have to satisfy low antigenecity, less inflammation, little tissue resorption, high regeneration power and good integration into the host tissue. The aim of our study is to evaluate histopathological changes and effectiveness resulting from the different obliterating materials in the temporal dorsal bullae in rats. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We divided the rats into two groups. Group A was untreated, but group B underwent removal of mastoid mucosa with 2% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). Both groups had mastoid obliteration by the implantation of hydroxyapatite cement (Mimix(R)) and demineralized bone matrix (Regenafil(R)). Twelve weeks after the implantation, a histological study was performed to evaluate remaining implanted material, new bone formation and the formation of cysts within the bullae. RESULTS: There was no or minimal inflammation or foreign body reactions in the mastoid obliteration groups with Mimix(R) and Regenafil(R). In the obliterated group that was not treated with 2% TCA, the remaining implanted material with Mimix(R) group was more than in the Regenafil(R) group (p<0.05). The obliterated groups of Mimix(R) and Regenafil(R) were similar with respect to new bone formation. The mucocele formation in the obliterated groups treated with 2% TCA was less than in the obliterated groups not treated with 2% TCA (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: We suggest that Mimix(R) and Regenafil(R) could be valuable resources as graft materials for mastoid obliteration procedures. The research continues for evaluation of long term results of these materials and their potential as graft materials.
