Addressing overuse in emergency medicine: evidence of a role for greater patient engagement.
- Author:
Erika H NEWTON
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Medical overuse; Decision making; Patient participation
- MeSH: Decision Making; Delivery of Health Care; Diagnosis; Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Emergencies*; Emergency Medicine*; Empathy; Humans; Jurisprudence; Medical Overuse; Patient Participation*; Patient Safety; Voice
- From: Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2017;4(4):189-200
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Overuse of health care refers to tests, treatments, and even health care settings when used in circumstances where they are unlikely to help. Overuse is not only wasteful, it threatens patient safety by exposing patients to a greater chance of harm than benefit. It is a widespread problem and has proved resistant to change. Overuse of diagnostic testing is a particular problem in emergency medicine. Emergency physicians cite fear of missing a diagnosis, fear of law suits, and perceived patient expectations as key contributors. However, physicians’ assumptions about what patients expect are often wrong, and overlook two of patients’ most consistently voiced priorities: communication and empathy. Evidence indicates that patients who are more fully informed and engaged in their care often opt for less aggressive approaches. Shared decision making refers to (1) providing balanced information so that patients understand their options and the trade-offs involved, (2) encouraging them to voice their preferences and values, and (3) engaging them—to the extent appropriate or desired—in decision making. By adopting this approach to discretionary decision making, physicians are better positioned to address patients’ concerns without the use of tests and treatments patients neither need nor value.
