Autologous Fat Graft in the Reconstructed Breast: Fat Absorption Rate and Safety based on Sonographic Identification.
10.5999/aps.2014.41.6.740
- Author:
Hong Youl KIM
1
;
Bok Ki JUNG
;
Dae Hyun LEW
;
Dong Won LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. xyphoss@yuhs.ac
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Breast;
Fat necrosis;
Ultrasonography
- MeSH:
Absorption*;
Axilla;
Breast*;
Congenital Abnormalities;
Fascia;
Fat Necrosis;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Mammaplasty;
Physical Examination;
Recurrence;
Retrospective Studies;
Skin;
Transplants*;
Ultrasonics;
Ultrasonography*
- From:Archives of Plastic Surgery
2014;41(6):740-747
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Autologous fat graft has become a useful technique for correction of acquired contour deformity in reconstructed breasts. However, there remains controversial regarding the efficacy and safety of the practice for reconstructive breast surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 102 patients who had secondary fat grafting after breast reconstruction. Fat harvest, refinement and injection were done by Coleman's technique. All patients were followed up postoperatively within 1 month and after 6 months including physical examination and ultrasonography. In 38 patients, the reabsorption rate was calculated by serial changes of thickness between skin and pectoral fascia in the ultrasonic finding. Locoregional recurrence rate was compared with control group of 449 patients who had breast reconstruction without fat graft in the same time period. RESULTS: Average 49.3 mL fat was injected into each breast. The most common location of fat graft was upper pole, followed by axilla, lower and medial breasts. During 28.7 months of average follow-up period, 2.9% of total patients had symptoms of palpable mass on fat graft side and ultrasonography identified fat necrosis and cyst formation in 17.6% of the patients. Calculated fat reabsorption rate was 32.9%. Locoregional recurrence was occurred in 1 patient (0.9%) and the rate was not different significantly with control group (2%). CONCLUSIONS: Although further studies are required to provide surgeons with definitive guidelines for the implementation of fat grafting, we propose autologous fat graft is an efficient and safe technique for secondary breast reconstruction.
