A clinical study on the anatomical site survival rate in intraoral squamous cell carcinoma.
- Author:
Kyung Wook KIM
1
;
Tae Hee LEE
Author Information
1. Departmentment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dankook University, Korea. thought2000@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Oral cancer;
Anatomical site;
Survival rate
- MeSH:
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell*;
Humans;
Korea;
Lymph Nodes;
Mandible;
Maxilla;
Mouth;
Mouth Floor;
Mouth Neoplasms;
Neoplasm Metastasis;
Prognosis;
Survival Rate*;
Tongue
- From:Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
2003;29(5):315-322
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND : Important factors to determine treatment method and prognosis of oral cancer are anatomical site, tumor size, metastatic lesion, histologic cell differenciation and microvascular invasion. Anatomical site has great effect to oral cancer patient's survival rate because each site's accessibility and lymph node metastasis is different but this factor was't studied much than other factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 228 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of common primary sites(Mandible, Maxilla, Floor of Mouth and Tongue) in oral cavity who were diagnosed in the Korea Cancer Center Hospital from January 1989 to December 1999, were clinically studied and analyzed on survival rate. RESULTS : 1. Survival rates of each anatomical sites were Tongue(36.8%), Mandible(33.3%), Maxilla(28.7%) and Floor of Mouth(24.5%). Survival rates difference between Tongue and Floor of Mouth has significance(p<0.05). 2. Survival rates for early cancer of each site were Maxilla(100%), Mandible(57.1%), Tongue(54.2%) and Floor of Mouth(46.7%). Survival rates difference between Maxilla and Floor of Mouth has significance(p<0.05). 3. Survival rates by surgery method of each site were Maxilla(60.6%), Tongue(56.9%), Mandible(44.8%) and Floor of Mouth(26.3%). Survival rates difference between Maxilla and Floor of Mouth has significance(p<0.05). 4. Survival rates by radiation or chemo method of each site were Floor of Mouth(23.5%), Mandible(20.0%), Maxilla(9.5%), and Tongue(9.1%). Survival rates difference between each site doesn't have significance(p>0.05). 5. In advance stage, Survival rates by single therapy of each site were Tongue(33.6%), Mandible(23.5%), Floor of Mouth(16.7%), Maxilla(0%), and Survival rates difference between Maxilla and Tongue has significance (p<0.05). Survival rates by combination therapy of each site were Mandible(38.1%), axilla(30.0%), Floor of mouth(18.2%), Tongue(12.5%), and Survival rates difference between Mandible and Tongue has significance(p<0.05). CONCLUSION : Survival rate of tongue is higher than the other sites, early detection of oral cancer can increase survival rate at any site and combination therapy is the most effetive method, especially at maxilla.
