Multilateral analysis of Renova(R) implant placement and its Survival rate.
10.5051/jkape.2008.38.3.413
- Author:
Jin Hyuk YANG
1
;
Sung Tae KIM
;
Ui Won JUNG
;
Woong NAM
;
Young Soo JUNG
;
June Sung SHIM
;
Hong Seok MOON
;
Keun Woo LEE
;
Kyoo Sung CHO
;
Seong Ho CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Periodontology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Korea. shchoi726@yuhc.ac,
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Renova(R) implant;
Cumulative survival rate;
Health scale for dental implants;
predictable implant system
- MeSH:
Dental Implants;
Dentistry;
Dentures;
Humans;
Osseointegration;
Prostheses and Implants;
Survival Rate;
Tooth
- From:The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology
2008;38(3):413-428
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Given the predictability of dental implant procedure from the studies of successful osseointegration, implant dentistry is often the treatment of choice to replace missing teeth in edentulous patient instead of the fixed prosthesis or removable denture. The Renova(R) dental implant has a RBM(Resorbable Blast Media) surface, internal hex prosthetic connection and a tapered design. At this study gives the analysis of the implant and the short term survival rate of the implant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, a multilateral analysis was performed on the subjects undergoing placement with Renova(R) implant between August 2006 and February 2008 in Yonsei University dental hospital. 96 implants were placed in 56 patients and they were surveyed for cumulative survival rate. Among them 78 implants in 44 patients were surveyed for the rest analyses. RESULT: 1. The cumulative survival rate was 96.88% of 96 implants in 56 patients. 2. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.803mm and the marginal bone loss in augmentation group has higher value than the marginal bone loss in non augmentation group. 3. The health scale for the implants were 87% in success group, 9% in satisfactory survival group, 1% in compromised survival group, and 3% in failure group. 4. Two implants placed in poor bone posterior area by 2-stage failed during prosthetic procedure. CONCLUSION: Renova(R) dental implant showed high cumulative survival rate in installation on partial edentulous ridge and could be a predictable implant system.
