Chinese expert consensus on the application of jejunal interposition for esophageal reconstruction in complex esophageal cancer surgery (2026 edition)
- VernacularTitle:复杂食管癌外科治疗中空肠代食管术应用的中国专家共识(2026版)
- Author:
Wenshu CHEN
1
;
Lilan ZHAO
1
;
Zhaoxian LIN
1
;
Debin OU
1
;
Zhigang LI
2
;
Chengchu ZHU
3
;
Longqi CHEN
4
;
Shuoyan LIU
5
;
Xiangnan LI
6
;
Chao CHENG
7
;
Ni ZHANG
8
;
Songping XIE
9
;
Xufeng GUO
2
;
Xu LI
10
;
Xinyu MEI
11
;
Xuefeng LENG
12
;
Jianqun MA
13
;
Zhijun HUANG
14
;
Guojun GENG
15
;
Lin ZHANG
16
;
Hongyan WANG
17
;
Yi ZHANG
18
;
Weijie WANG
19
;
Jiangbo LIN
20
;
Jinbiao XIE
21
;
Jun GUAN
22
;
Rongqi HE
23
;
Xing LIN
1
;
Xiuhua TU
1
;
Yong LI
24
;
Lijie TAN
25
;
Xiaojie PAN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Esophageal neoplasms; jejunal esophageal replacement; pedicled jejunal interposition; supercharge; digestive tract reconstruction; expert consensus
- From: Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2026;33(10):1527-1543
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: Objective Jejunal interposition is an important option for restoring gastrointestinal continuity in patients with complex esophageal cancer in whom the stomach is unavailable for reconstruction due to previous gastrectomy, tumor involvement, failed gastric conduit, or other constraints. Although the jejunum offers a caliber similar to the esophagus, a rich blood supply, and preserved peristaltic function, anatomical variations in mesenteric length and vascular arcades render long-segment and high-level reconstruction susceptible to excessive tension, mesenteric torsion, venous congestion, and inadequate distal perfusion. This consensus aims to provide standardized recommendations for the application of jejunal interposition in this specific patient population. Methods This consensus was developed in accordance with the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development and Chinese national guideline development standards, with reference to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Ⅱ(AGREE Ⅱ), Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT), and Scientific, Transparent and Applicable Rankings (STAR) checklists. The project was registered on the international practice guidelines registry platform (PREPARE-2026CN1384). The working group systematically searched Chinese and English evidence addressing 12 clinical questions. Evidence was graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2009 system, with structured appraisal of risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. Recommendations were formulated through two rounds of Delphi surveys and a face-to-face consensus meeting, with an agreement threshold of ≥75%. Results The consensus generated 12 recommendations covering indications, selection between jejunum and colon, preoperative assessment, surgical approach and reconstruction route, pedicled jejunal interposition (PJI), supercharged pedicled jejunal interposition (SPJ), indocyanine green (ICG) perfusion assessment, perioperative nutrition, management of anastomotic leakage, long-term follow-up, and special treatment scenarios. Given that the available direct evidence is predominantly derived from single-center retrospective cohorts and case series, recommendations extrapolated from general esophagectomy or other gastrointestinal surgical evidence are deliberately phrased with caution. Conclusion Jejunal interposition is a safe and effective approach for digestive tract reconstruction in patients with complex esophageal cancer in whom the stomach is unavailable. This consensus emphasizes that clinical decision-making should be individualized based on the patient's prior treatment history, reconstruction height, vascular anatomy, technical availability, and institutional experience in the Chinese context.
