Secondary prevention after cerebrovascular events: Will Angiotensin Receptor Blocker protect?.
- Author:
Aloysius DOMINGO
;
Paul Matthew D PASCO
;
Jose Leonard PASCUAL
- Publication Type:Journal Article, Original
- Keywords: AntihypertensivesAngiotensin Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive TreatmentMantel Haenszel Risk Ratio
- MeSH: Human; Humans; Antihypertensive Agents; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Odds Ratio; Secondary Prevention; Confidence Intervals; Blood Pressure; Stroke; Hypotension; Risk; Primary Prevention; Hypertension
- From: Philippine Journal of Neurology 2009;13(2):54-54
- CountryPhilippines
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Several trials have raised the possibility that specific antihypertensives give protection against stroke beyond the effect seen with blood pressure reduction. In previous studies, ACE inhibitors have been shown to reduce both first and recurrent strokes. Angiotensin receptor blockers have shown benefit in the primary prevention, but evidence for secondary prevention is lacking.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective is to determine if antihypertensive treatment with ARBs compared with other antihypertensive therapy decreases the risk of vascular events in patients with previous stroke. Secondary outcomes include risk for cerebrovascular events, for cardiovascular events, and overall mortality.
METHODS: Data from randomised controlled comparisons an ARB-based antihypertensive regimen with non-ARB-based treatment, administered to patients with previous cerebrovascular event, and where outcomes include stroke recurrence, were included. Meta-analysis was performed using the fixed effects model. Treatment effect was measured using the Mantel Haenszel Risk Ratio using a 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Two studies were primarily trials of antihypertensive therapy on patients with previous stroke, two studies were subgroup analyses, and one study was a Phase II trial of hypertension treatment in acute stroke. Treatment with ARBs was associated with statistically significant reductions in the risk for vascular events (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96), recurrent stroke (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.98), and cardiovascular events (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.98). There was no effect on mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from this review supports the use of antihypertensive therapy using ARBs in patients with previous cerebrovascular events. Treatment with such is shown to significantly reduce all vascular events post-stroke, and spear reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and the occurrence of cardiovascular morbidity, although there is no effect on mortality.