Construction and effectiveness analysis of a medication management model by urological pharmacists under the DRGs payment system
- VernacularTitle:DRGs支付背景下泌尿外科药师用药管控模式构建与效果分析
- Author:
Jingwei QIU
1
;
Huishi PANG
1
;
Qiuyong ZHENG
2
;
Hui YAO
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Clinical Pharmacy，Foshan Second People’s Hospital/Foshan Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Pharmaceutical University，Guangdong Foshan 528000，China
2. Dept. of Urology，Foshan Second People’s Hospital/Foshan Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Pharmaceutical University，Guangdong Foshan 528000，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
diagnosis related groups;
urology department;
surgical pharmacist;
medication management;
Rational drug use
- From:
China Pharmacy
2026;37(16):2181-2186
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To explore the working model and practical effectiveness of surgical pharmacists participating in the rational medication management of urology department under the background of diagnosis related groups （DRGs） payment system.METHODS In the context of DRGs， surgical pharmacists have constructed a rational drug use control model for key DRGs disease groups with a high number of urological cases in three stages： the pre stage， which includes developing perioperative drug use guidelines and implementing a rational drug use management system intervention； the mid-term stage， which includes conducting specialized evaluations in conjunction with DRGs disease groups， conducting pharmaceutical ward rounds and medical order reviews， conducting rational drug use training and science popularization； the post event stage， which includes establishing a performance evaluation system for clinical departments and surgical pharmacists， and collecting reasons why surgical physicians did not adopt surgical pharmacist recommendations. Patients who entered DRGs groups and were discharged from the urology department of Foshan Second People’s Hospital were selected as the research subjects. The changes in departmental DRGs indicators [including number of DRGs groups， total weight， case mix index （CMI）， average length of stay， time consumption index， average cost per case， cost consumption index， average drug cost per case， drug consumption index， and mortality in low- and medium-risk] were compared before pharmacist intervention （June to December 2022）， after 1 year of intervention （June to December 2023）， and after 2 years of intervention （June to December 2024）. The improvement in medication rational rates （for antibiotics， hemocoagulase， and proton pump inhibitors） and pharmacy performance assessment indicators [average drug cost per case， defined daily doses （DDDs， excluding traditional Chinese medicine）， and antibiotic use density （AUD）] in the top 5 DRGs groups by case volume were statistically analyzed. The reasons for non-adoption of medication intervention recommendations by urologists were further analyzed.RESULTS With the participation of surgical pharmacists in the rational medication management of urology department， the number of DRGs groups， total weight， and CMI in the urology department increased year by year， while the average length of stay， average cost per case， and average drug cost per case decreased year by year， there were no low- to medium-risk deaths before and after the medication management. The average drug cost per case， DDDs， and AUD in the top 5 key DRGs groups （LE15， LE13， MC15， MC13， and LK19） were significantly decreased compared with those before intervention （ P ＜0.05）. The medication rational rates （for antibiotics， hemocoagulase， and proton pump inhibitors） in the above 5 key DRGs groups were significantly increased compared with those before intervention （ P ＜0.05）. After 2 years of pharmacist intervention， the non-adoption rates of urologists for medication interventions related to antibiotics， hemocoagulase， and proton pump inhibitors were significantly lower than those after 1 year of intervention （ P ＜0.05）； the main reason for not adopting interventions related to hemocoagulase was that surgeons believed “increasing the daily dose could shorten the hemostasis course”， the main reason for not adopting interventions related to antibiotics was “postoperative elevation of inflammatory indicators necessitates prolonged treatment”.CONCLUSIONS The hospital has successfully established a model of surgical pharmacists participating in the rational medication management of urology department. This model has improved departmental DRGs indicators and pharmacy performance assessment indicators， and enhanced the medication rational rate.
