Comprehensive clinical evaluation of phosphate-lowering drugs in the treatment of chronic kidney disease with hyperphosphatemia
- VernacularTitle:治疗慢性肾脏病伴高磷血症的降磷类药物临床综合评价
- Author:
Lu LIU
1
;
Cangsang SONG
1
;
Xingde LI
1
;
Chunni HAN
1
;
Run SUN
1
;
Chunjie YU
1
;
Yalin LI
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，Kunming First People’s Hospital，Kunming 650224，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
phosphate-lowering drugs;
chronic kidney disease;
hyperphosphatemia;
calcium-based phosphate binders;
non-calcium-based phosphate binders;
sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3 inhibitors
- From:
China Pharmacy
2026;37(14):1918-1924
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To conduct a comprehensive clinical evaluation of phosphate-lowering drugs in the treatment of chronic kidney disease （CKD） with hyperphosphatemia， and to provide evidence-based support for clinical drug decision-making. METHODS Relevant studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were retrieved， a comprehensive evaluation of efficacy， safety and economics was conducted based on existing study results. Innovation was analyzed from three aspects including filling the clinical gap， and suitability was assessed from two aspects including technical suitability. Accessibility was evaluated based on the survey data from 37 medical institutions in Kunming， combined with information from the National Reimbursement Drug List and national centralized drug procurement. RESULTS A total of 10 meta-analyses and 2 pharmacoeconomic studies were included. In terms of efficacy， all three categories of phosphate-lowering drugs （calcium-based phosphate binders， non-calcium-based phosphate binders， sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3 inhibitors） effectively reduced serum phosphorus levels. Calcium-based phosphate binders elevated serum calcium levels more significantly； sevelamer was superior to calcium-based phosphate binders in reducing intact parathyroid hormone levels； iron-based phosphate binders improved iron metabolism and anemia-related indicators. In terms of safety， iron-based phosphate binders had the highest incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions， followed by lanthanum carbonate. In terms of economics， sevelamer demonstrated economic advantages over calcium-based phosphate binders and lanthanum carbonate. In terms of innovation， non-ca lcium-based phosphate binders addressed the clinical limitation of hypercalcemia associated with calcium-based phosphate binders； iron-based phosphate binders met the treatment needs of patients with comorbid iron deficiency anemia； tenapanor exhibited an innovative phosphorus-lowering mechanism. In terms of suitability， all three categories showed good suitability in various aspects. In terms of accessibility， sevelamer had the highest availability rate， while tenapanor was not yet available in medical institutions. All three categories have been included in the National Reimbursement Drug List ； the prices of lanthanum carbonate and sevelamer decreased substantially following centralized procurement with improved affordability. CONCLUSIONS For CKD patients with hyperphosphatemia， non-calcium-based phosphate binders are preferred， among which sevelamer is recommended as the first-line choice. Lanthanum carbonate may be considered for patients with gastrointestinal intolerance； iron-based phosphate binders are preferred for patients with comorbid iron deficiency anemia； tenapanor may be considered for patients with poor response to or intolerance of conventional regimens； calcium-based phosphate binders are not recommended as long-term first-line therapy.
