Impact of hepatic steatosis on viral load and hepatic fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis B

Shi YIN; Lianxin ZHU; Guanghui REN; Guiqun HUANG; Yunpeng GUAN; Ying ZHU

Return

Impact of hepatic steatosis on viral load and hepatic fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis B

VernacularTitle:肝脂肪变性对慢性乙型肝炎病毒载量及肝纤维化进展的影响
Author: Shi YIN ¹ ; Lianxin ZHU ¹ ; Guanghui REN ¹ ; Guiqun HUANG ¹ ; Yunpeng GUAN ¹ ; Ying ZHU ¹
Author Information

1. Department of Infectious Disease （Liver Disease Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine）， The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University， Dalian， Liaoning 116021， China
Publication Type:Journal Article
Keywords: Hepatitis B， Chronic; Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease; Viral Load; Hepatic Fibrosis
From: Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2026;42(6):1279-1286
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the association of hepatic steatosis with the level of viral replication and the progression of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B （CHB） through a real-world study， and to determine the independent influencing factors for hepatic fibrosis. MethodsA total of 887 CHB patients who attended the outpatient service and inpatient ward of Hepatology in The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from July 2021 to March 2025 were enrolled as subjects， and according to the presence or absence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease （MASLD）， they were divided into CHB group with 560 patients and CHB+MASLD group with 327 patients. The association between hepatic steatosis and HBV load in CHB patients was analyzed， as well as the impact of varying degrees of hepatic steatosis on hepatic fibrosis. The t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups； the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups； a Spearman correlation analysis was performed； a Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate influencing factors. ResultsThe patients enrolled received antiviral therapy according to viral load； of all patients， 275 （31%） received nucleos（t）ide analogue combined with pegylated interferon-α， 532 （60%） received nucleos（t）ide analogue monotherapy， and 80 （9%） did not receive antiviral therapy. A total of 44 patients （5.0%） who were receiving PEG-IFN-α therapy and had marked thrombocytopenia were excluded， and finally 843 patients were included for comparison of aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index （APRI） and fibrosis-4 index （FIB-4）. Compared with the CHB group， the CHB+MASLD group had a significantly higher proportion of male patients （χ²=5.917， P<0.05） and a significant increase in CAP value （t=21.646， P<0.05）. The median values of liver function parameters for the population enrolled were within the normal range， and no significant inflammatory activity was observed. The virological analysis showed that compared with the CHB group， the CHB+MASLD group had significantly lower serum level of pregenomic RNA （Z=-2.894， P<0.05） and HBeAg positivity rate （χ²=8.725， P<0.05）， and CAP was significantly negatively correlated with pgRNA （r=-0.117， P<0.05）. In the HBeAg-negative subgroup， compared with the CHB group， the CHB+MASLD group had a significantly lower level of hepatitis B surface antigen （Z=-0.765， P<0.05）； in the HBeAg-positive subgroup， the CHB+MASLD group had a significantly higher level of HBV DNA than the CHB group （Z=-2.509， P<0.05）. The analysis of hepatic fibrosis showed that the CHB+MASLD group had significantly lower values of APRI （Z=-3.418， P<0.05） and FIB-4 （Z=-6.237， P<0.05）. Compared with the CHB group， the CHB+MASLD S1 group had a significantly higher proportion of patients without fibrosis and a significantly lower proportion patients with liver cirrhosis （χ²=7.935， P<0.05）； in the CHB+MASLD S2 group， there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with different fibrosis stages； the CHB+MASLD S3 group had a significantly lower proportion of patients without fibrosis and a significantly higher proportion of patients with early-stage fibrosis （χ²=9.101， P<0.05）. The Logistic regression analysis showed that an increase in CAP （odds ratio ［OR］=1.08， 95% confidence interval ［CI］： 1.03 — 1.13， P<0.05）， an increase in age （OR=1.02， 95%CI： 1.01 — 1.04， P<0.05）， male sex （OR=1.77， 95%CI： 1.19 — 2.64， P<0.05）， an increase in HBV DNA （OR=1.35， 95%CI： 1.15 — 1.57， P<0.001）， an increase in aspartate aminotransferase （OR=1.02， 95%CI： 1.01 — 1.03， P<0.001）， and an increase in gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase （OR=1.00， 95%CI： 1.00 — 1.01， P=0.028） were independent influencing factors for hepatic fibrosis. The risk of hepatic fibrosis in S3 patients was higher than that in patients without steatosis （OR=5.05， 95%CI： 2.48 — 10.29， P<0.001）. ConclusionThere is a lower level of HBV replication in CHB patients comorbid with MASLD. Hepatic steatosis is associated with HBV-related virological markers and the progression of hepatic fibrosis， and severe fatty liver disease may promote the progression of hepatic fibrosis in CHB patients.