Efficacy of intelligent wireless endoscopy in transurethral resection of the prostate
10.12483/j.issn.1009-8291.2026.02.006
- VernacularTitle:智能无线腔镜用于前列腺电切术效果分析
- Author:
Chao FANG
1
;
Zeping ZUO
1
;
Chaozhao LIANG
2
;
Zongyao HAO
2
;
Hongtao YU
1
;
Jinhai ZHU
1
;
Yuesheng WANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Tongling People's Hospital, Tongling 244000
2. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
benign prostatic hyperplasia;
intelligent wireless endoscopy;
transurethral resection of the prostate;
preoperative preparation;
operation time;
operator operating comfort
- From:
Journal of Modern Urology
2026;31(2):135-139
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of intelligent wireless endoscopy in transurethral resection of the prostate, so as to provide evidence for clinical application. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 70 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate at Tongling People's Hospital during Jan. 2023 and Dec. 2024. Based on the type of endoscopes used, patients were divided into a wireless endoscopy group and a traditional endoscopy group, with 35 patients in either group. Differences between the two groups were compared in terms of surgical preparation time, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, catheter indwelling time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical complications, and operating comfort during the procedure. Results All 70 operations were successfully completed without severe urinary incontinence. The wireless laparoscopy group demonstrated significantly shorter surgical preparation time compared to the traditional laparoscopy group [(12.14±2.39)min vs. (14.89±0.80)min, P＜0.001].There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time between the two groups [(93.51±34.49)min vs. (101.71±34.87)min, P=0.326]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in postoperative hospital stay, catheter indwelling time, intraoperative blood loss, and surgical complications (P＞0.05). The wireless endoscopy group demonstrated significantly higher operating comfort compared to the traditional endoscopy group [(3.94±0.77) vs. (2.57±0.61), P＜0.001]. Conclusion The use of intelligent wireless endoscopy for transurethral resection of the prostate is comparable to traditional endoscopy in surgical efficacy and patient safety, but it can shorten preoperative preparation time and improve operator comfort.
