Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy in treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer： A meta-analysis
- VernacularTitle:局部晚期胰腺癌经调强放射治疗和体部立体定向放射治疗的有效性及安全性的Meta分析
- Author:
Junjie LEI
1
;
Yanjiao WEI
2
;
Qilin REN
3
;
Hongjian REN
4
;
Yarong GUO
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Pancreatic Neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Meta-Analysis
- From: Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2026;42(5):1125-1132
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: ObjectiveTo systematically analyze the differences in therapeutic efficacy between intensity-modulated radiotherapy （IMRT） and stereotactic body radiotherapy （SBRT） for locally advanced pancreatic cancer （LAPC）， and to provide a basis for treatment decision-making. MethodsPubMed， Embase， the Cochrane Library， CNKI， Wanfang Data， and VIP databases were searched for prospective or retrospective cohort studies on IMRT versus SBRT for the treatment of LAPC published up to July 31， 2025. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of studies， and Review Manager 5.4 was used to perform the Meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 23 studies involving 2 505 patients were included. In terms of local control rate， an analysis of 13 studies with 847 patients showed that the SBRT group had a significantly higher 1-year local control rate than the IMRT group （84.5% vs 66.7%， relative risk ［RR］=1.27， 95% confidence interval ［CI］： 1.03 — 1.56， I2=28%， P=0.026）. In terms of acute toxicity， an analysis of 15 studies showed that the SBRT group had a significantly lower incidence rate of grade≥3 acute toxicity than the IMRT group （3.5% vs 11.0%， RR=0.32， 95%CI： 0.19 — 0.53， I2=18%， P<0.001）. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the SBRT group and the IMRT group （16.8 months vs 16.3 months）. The subgroup analysis of local control rate showed that in the 9 high-quality studies， the SBRT group had a significantly higher local control rate than the IMRT group （RR=1.25， P<0.001）， and a similar result was observed in the 4 moderate-quality studies （RR=1.31， P=0.021）； the stratified analysis based on technique platforms showed that the MR-guided technique group showed the largest effect size （RR=1.40， I2=10%）. The sensitivity analysis showed that the RR value ranged from 1.21 to 1.28， with stable results. The Egger regression analysis showed no significant publication bias （P>0.05）. ConclusionSBRT is superior to IMRT in terms of local control rate and acute toxicity and is a preferred treatment option for LAPC， with the MR-guided techniques showing the best performance.
